Joint inversion of multiple data types with the use of multiobjective optimization: Problem formulation and application to the seismic anisotropy investigations

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 171, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 761-779

  Kozlovskaya, Elena ^a   Vecsey, L ^b   Plomerova J ^b   Raita, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Inverse theory; Joint inversion; Lithosphere; P waves; Seismic anisotropy; Shear wave splitting

Indexed keywords

DATA INVERSION; DATA SET; INVERSE PROBLEM; JOINT; OPTIMIZATION; P-WAVE; PARAMETERIZATION; S-WAVE; SEISMIC ANISOTROPY; SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAM;

EID: 35348911359     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03540.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Babuška, V. & Cara, M., 1991. Seismic Anisotropy in the Earth, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortdrecht, Boston, London. 213 p.
2. Babuška, V., Plomerová, J. & Šileny, J., 1984a. Large-scale oriented structures in the subcrustal lithosphere of Central Europe. Ann. Geoph., 2, 649-662.
3. BabuŠka, V., Plomerová, J. & Šileny, J., 1994b. Spatial variations of P-residuals and deep structure of the European lithosphere., Geoph. J. R. Astr. Soc., 79, 363-383.
4. Babuška, V., Plomerová, J. & Šílený, J., 1993. Models of seismic anisotropy in the deep continental lithosphere, PEPI, 78, 167-191.
5. Babuška, V. & Plomerová, J., 2004. Sorgenfrei-Tornquist Zone as the mantle edge of Baltica lithosphere: New evidence from three-dimensional seismic anisotropy, Terra Nova, 16, 243-249
6. Ben Ismaïl, W. & Mainprice, D., 1998. An olivine fabric database: An overview of upper mantle fabrics and seismic anisotropy, Tectonophysics, 296, 145-157.
7. Bock, G & SVEKALAPKO Seismic Tomography Working Group, 2001. Seismic probing of Fennoscandian lithosphere, EOS, Trans. AGU, 82, 621, 628-629.
8. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W., 1960. Management Models and Industrial Application of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York.
9. Goltsman, M.F., 1982. Physical Experiment and Statistical Conclusions, St Petersburg University (in Russian), St. Petersburg.
10. Hjelt, S.-E., 1992. Pragmatic Inversion of Geophysical Data, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
11. Kozlovskaya, E., 2000. An algorithm of geophysical data inversion based on non-probabilistic presentation of a-priori information and definition of Pareto-optimality, Inverse Problems, 16, 839-861.
12. Kuhn, H.W. & Tucker, A.W., 1951. Nonlinear programming, in Proceedings of the Second Berkley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 481-492, ed. Neyman J., University of California Press.
13. Menke, W., 1989. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, Academic Press, London.
14. Montagner, J.-P., 1998. Where can seismic anisotropy be detected in the earth's mantle?In boundary layers, Pure Appl. Geophys., 151, 223-256.
15. Plomerová, J., Šílený, J. & Babuška, V., 1996. Joint interpretation of upper-mantle anisotropy based on teleseismic P-travel-time delays and inversion of shear-wave splitting parameters, PEPI, 95, 293-309.
16. Plomerová J., Arvidsson R., Babuška V., Granet M., Kulhánek O., Poupinet G. & Šílený J., 2001. An array study of lithospheric structure across the Protogine zone, Varmland, south-central Sweden -signs of a paleocontinental collision, Tectonophysics, 332, 1-21.
17. Plomerová, J., Vecsey, L., Babuška, V., Granet, M. & Achauer, U., 2005. Passive seismic experiment MOSAIC - a pilote study of mantle lithosphere of the Bohemian Massif, Stud. Geophys. Geod., 49, 541-560.
18. Plomerová, J., Babuška, V.,. Vecsey, L., Kozlovskaya, E. & Raita, T., 2006. Proterozoic-Archean boundary in the upper mantle of eastern Fennoscandia as seen by seismic anisotropy, J. Geodyn., 41(4), 369-450.
19. Podinovsky, V.V. & Nogin, V.D., 1982. Pareto-Optimal Solutions of Multicriteria Problems, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
20. Raiche, A.P., Jupp, D.L.B., Rutter, H. & Vozoff, K., 1985. The joint use of coincident loop electromagnetic and Schlumberger sounding to resolve layered structures, Geophysics, 50, 1618-1627.
21. Roy, L., Sen, M.K., Stoffa, K., McIntosh, K. & Nakamura, Y., 2005. Joint inversion of first arrival travel time and gravity data, J. Geophys. Eng., 2, 277-289.
22. Sakawa, M., 1993. Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multiobjective Optimization, Plentum Press, New York.
23. Sambridge, M., 1999a. Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm I: Searching a parameter space, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 479-494.
24. Sambridge, M., 1999b. Geophysical Inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm II: Appraising the ensemble, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 727-746.
25. Sandvol, E. & Hearn, T., 1994. Bootstrapping shear-wave splitting errors, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84(6), 1971-1977.
26. Savage, M.K., 1999. Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting? Rev. Geophys., 37(1), 65-106.
27. Savage, M.K. & Silver, P.G., 1993. Mantle deformation and tectonics: constraints from seismic anisotropy in western United States, PEPI, 78, 207-227.
28. Silver, P.G. & Chan, W.W., 1988. Implication for continental structure and evolution from seismic anisotropy, Nature, 335, 34-39.
29. Silver, P.G. & Chan, W.W., 1991. Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation, J. Geophys. Res., 96(B10), 16429-16454.
30. Šílený, J. & Plomerová, J., 1996. Inversion of shear wave splitting parameters to retrieve three-dimensional orientation of anisotropy in continental lithosphere, PEPI, 95, 277-292.
31. Sobol, I.M., 1985. Multicriteria interpretation of method of regularization of ill-posed problems, Preprint of Institute of Applied Mathematics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow (in Russian).
32. Tarantola, A., 1987a. Inverse Problem Theory, Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York.
33. Tarantola, A., 1987b. Inversion of travel times and seismic waveforms, in Seismic Tomography with Applications in Global Seismology and Exploration Geophysics, pp. 135-157, ed. Nolet, G., D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
34. Tarantola, A. & Valette, B., 1982. Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20(2), 219-232.
35. Tikhonov, A.N. & Arsenin, V.Y., 1977. Solution of Ill-Posed Problems, VH Winston & Sons, Washington, DC.
36. Vinnik, L.P., Farra, V. & Romanowicz, B., 1989. Azimuthal anisotropy in the lithosphere from observations of long-period S-waves, Geophys. J. Int., 99, 549-559.
37. Voigt, W., 1928. Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik, Teubner-Verlag, Leipzig.
38. Vozoff, K. & Jupp, D.L.B., 1975. Joint inversion of geophysical data, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 42, 977-991.
39. Weiss, T., Siegesmund, S. & Bohlen, T., 1999. Seismic, structural and petrological models of the subcrustal lithosphere in southern Germany: A quantitative revaluation, Pure Appl. Geophys., 156, 53-81.
40. Yu, P.L., 1973. A class of solutions for group decision problems, Manage. Sci., 19, 936-946.
41. Zeyen, H. & Achauer, U., 1997. Joint inversion of teleseismic delay times and gravity anomaly data for regional structures, in Upper Mantle Heterogeneities from Active and Passive Seismology, pp. 155-168, ed. Fuchs, K, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
42. Zeleny, M., 1973. Compromise programming, in Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 262-301, eds Chochrane J.L. & Zeleny M., University of South California Press, Columbia.
43. Zeleny, M., 1982. Multiple Criteria Desision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York.