Predicting local residents' use of nearby outdoor recreation areas through quality perceptions and recreational expectations

Forest Snow and Landscape Research

Volumn 81, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 31-41

  Frick, Jacqueline ^a   Degenhardt, Barbara ^a   Buchecker, Matthias ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Environmental quality; Leisure behaviour; Outdoor recreation; Restoration; Visitor flows

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; OUTDOOR RECREATION; PERCEPTION; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH WORK; RESIDENT POPULATION; URBAN AREA;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SWITZERLAND; ZURICH [SWITZERLAND];

EID: 35348895989     PISSN: 14245108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. AMMER, U.; PRÖBSTL, U., 1991: Freizeit und Natur. Probleme und Lösungsmöglichkeiten einer ökologisch verträglichen Freizeitnutzung. Hamburg, Paul Parey.
2. ARE (Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung), 2005: Raumentwicklungsbericht. Bern, ARE.
3. ARNBERGER, A.; HAIDER, W., 2005: Social effects on crowding preferences of urban forest visitors. Urban For. Urban Greening 3: 125-136.
4. BAUMAN, A.E.; SALLIS, J.F.; DZEWALTOWSKI, D.A.; NEVILLE, O., 2002: Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity. Am. J. Prev. Med. 23: 5-14.
5. BEARD, J.G.; RAGHEB, M.G., 1983: Measuring leisure motivation. J. Leis. Res. 15, 3: 219-228.
6. BELL, P.A.; FISHER, J.D.; BAUM, A.; GREENE, T.C., 1996: Environmental Psychology (Vol. 4). Fort Worth, Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
7. BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft), 1999: Gesellschaftliche Ansprüche an den Schweizer Wald - Meinungsumfrage (Vol. 309). Bern, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft.
8. BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft), 2000: Freizeit im Wald. Schlussbericht. Bern, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft.
9. CHIESURA, A., 2004: The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc. Urban Plan. 68: 129-138.
10. CROMBIE, I.K.; IRVINE, L.; WILLIAMS, B.; MCGINNIS, A.R.; SLANE, P.W.; ALDER, E.M.; MCMURDO M.E., 2004: Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing 33, 3: 287-292.
11. DRIVER, B.L., 1996: Benefits-driven management of natural areas. Nat. Areas J. 16: 94-99.
12. DTLR (Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions), 2002: Green spaces, better places. Final Report of the Urban Green Spaces TaskForce. London, Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions.
13. ELSASSER, B.; FEHR, U.; MAURHOFER, F., 1977: Erholungsräume im Berggebiet: Verfahren, Methoden und Eignungskriterien zur Bewertung und Selektion bestehender und potentieller Erholungsgebiete. Zürich, Elektrowatt Ingenieurunternehmung AG.
14. ELSASSER, P., 1996: Struktur, Besuchsmotive und Erwartungen von Waldbesuchern. Eine empirische Studie in der Region Hamburg (96/1). Hamburg, Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst- und Holzwirtschaft, Institut für Ökonomie.
15. FUHRER, U.; KAISER, F., 1994: Multilokales Wohnen. Bern, Huber.
16. GIVONI, B., 1991: Impact of Planted Areas on Urban Environmental. Quality: A review. Atmos. Environ. 25B, 3: 289-299.
17. GOBSTER, P.H.; WESTPHAL, L.M., 2004: The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 68, 2/3: 147-165.
18. GOOSSEN, M.; LANGERS, F., 2000: Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: finding the most important indicators for recreation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 46: 241-251.
19. HARTIG, T., 2004: Restorative environments. In: SPIELBERGER, C. (ed) Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. San Diego, Academia Press. 3: 273-279.
20. Health Council of the Netherlands, 2004: Nature and Health. The influence on nature on social, psychological and physical well-being (report no. 2004/09E). The Hague, Health Council of the Netherlands and RMNO.
21. HEBERLEIN, T.A.; FREDMAN, P., 2002: Motivation, constraints and visits to Swedish mountains. Östersund, European Tourism Research Institute.
22. HOBFOLL, S.E., 2001: The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conversation of resources theory. App. Psychol.: Int. Rev. 50, 3: 337-369.
23. ISO-AHOLA, S.E., 1980: The social psychology of leisure and recreation. Dubuque, IA, Brown.
24. JACKSON, E.L., 2005: Constraints to leisure. State College, PA, Venture Publishing.
25. JACKSON, E.L.; HENDERSON, K.A., 1995: Gender-based analysis of leisure constraints. Leis. Sci. 17: 31-51.
26. JENKINS, J.; PIGRAM, J., 2003: Encyclopedia of Leisure and Outdoor Recreation. London, Routledge.
27. KUO, F.E.; SULLIVAN, W.C.; COLEY, L.; BRUNSON, L., 1998: Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. A. J. Community Psychol. 26, 6: 823-851.
28. LAUMANN, K.; GÄRLING, T.; STORMARK, K.M., 2001: Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 21: 31-44.
29. LAWTON, M.P., 1993: Meanings of activity. In: KELLY, J.R. (ed) Activity and aging. Newbury Park, CA, Sage. 125-144.
30. LEYDEN, K.M., 2003: Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am. J. Public Health 93, 9: 1546-1551.
31. MANFREDO, M.J.; DRIVER, B.L.; TARRANT, M.A., 1996: Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. J. Leis. Res. 28, 3: 188-213.
32. MANNING, R.E., 1999: Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for satisfaction. Corvalis OR, Oregon State University Press.
33. MÜLLER, H., 1999: Freizeit und Tourismus. Eine Einführung in Theorie und Politik. Bern, Universität Bern, Forschungsinstitut für Freizeit und Toursimus.
34. NOHL, W., 2001: Landschaftsplanung. Ästhetische und rekreative Aspekte. Berlin, Patzer.
35. SAARINEN, J., 1998: Cultural influences on wilderness encounter responses. Int. J. Wilderness 4, 1: 28-32.
36. SCHÜLER, M.; PERLIK, M.; PASCHE, N., 2004: Nicht-städtisch, rural oder peripher - wo steht der ländliche Raum heute? Bern, Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung.
37. SHORES, K.A.; SCOTT, D.; FLOYD, M.F., 2007: Constraints to outdoor recreation: a multiple hierarchy stratification perspective. Leis. Sci. 29: 227-246.
38. STAATS, H.; HARTIG, T., 2004: Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 2: 199-211.
39. STAATS, H.; KIEVIET, A.; HARTIG, T., 2003: Where to recover from attentional fatigue: an expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J. Environ. Psychol. 23: 147-157.
40. SUGIYAMA, T.; WARD THOMPSON, C., 2005: Environmental support for outdoor activities and older people's quality of life. J. Hous. Elder. 19, 3/4: 167-185.
41. United Nations. Population Division, 2000: Urban agglomerations 1999. New York, United Nations.
42. VOGT, C.A.; MARANS, R.W., 2004: Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: a study of recent movers to fringe counties in southeast Michigan. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69: 255-269.
43. VRIES, S. DE, 2002: The effect of greenspace in the living environment on recreation (and health). In: BARROS, S. (ed) Proceedings of the All division 6 IUFRO-meeting, Valdivia (Chile), Nov 2002. 192-207.
44. st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 60, 2: 59-72.
45. ZEIDENITZ, C., 2005: Freizeitaktivitäten in der Schweiz - wegen oder gegen Natur und Landschaft? Eine umweltpsychologische Studie zu Motiven, Einstellungen und Lenkungsstrategien. Birmensdorf, Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft WSL.