Situational computing: An innovative architecture with imprecise reasoning

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 80, Issue 12 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 1993-2014

  Anagnostopoulos, C B ^a   Ntarladimas, Y ^a   Hadjiefthymiades, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Context awareness; Fuzzy and approximate reasoning; Human computer interaction; Ontological modeling; Pervasive computing; Situational context representation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; CONTEXT SENSITIVE LANGUAGES; DATA STRUCTURES; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; ONTOLOGY;

APPROXIMATE REASONING; CONTEXT AWARENESS; ONTOLOGICAL MODELING; SITUATIONAL CONTEXT REPRESENTATION;

UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

EID: 35348888627     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen F. Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23 (1984) 123-154
2. Anagnostopoulos, C., Ntarladimas, Y., Hadjiefthymiades, S., 2006. Reasoning about Situation Similarity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems, September 2006, London.
3. Baader, F., Kusters, R., Molitor, R., 2000. Rewriting concepts using terminologies. In: Cohn, G., Giunchinglia, F., Selman, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, April 2000, Colorado, USA. pp. 297-308.
4. Baader F., Calvanese D., McGiuness D., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P. The Description Logic Handbook - Theory, Implementation, and Applications (2003), Cambridge University Press
5. Billings C.E. Situation awareness measurement and analysis: A commentary. Proceedings of the International Conference on Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness (1995), Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press, FL
6. Crowley, J., Reigner, P., Coutaz, J., Rey, G., 2002. Perceptual Components for Context Aware Computing. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing September 2002, Sweden. pp. 117-134.
7. Dey, A., Abowd, G., 2000. Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Netherlands, April 2000.
8. Dey A., Abowd G., and Wood a. Cyberdesk: a framework for providing self-integrating context-aware services. Knowledge-Based Systems 11 (1998) 3-13
9. Dong W., and Xu K. A Situation Calculus-based Approach To Model Ubiquitous Information Services. Computer Science AI (2004)
10. Frakes W., and Baeza R. Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms (1992), Prentice Hall
11. Grimm, S., and Motik, B., 2005. Closed World Reasoning in the Semantic Web through Epistemic Operators. In: Proceedings of the OWL: Experiences and Directions Workshop, November 2005, Galway, Ireland.
12. Haarslev, V., and Moeller, R., 2001. RACER system description. In: Proceedings of the International Joint conference on Automated Reasoning, June 2001, Siena, Italy, vol. 2083 of Springer LNAI. pp. 701-705.
13. Hahn U., Schulz S., and Romacker M. Part-whole reasoning: a case study in medical ontology engineering. Intelligent Systems and their Applications 14 5 (1999) 59-67
14. Heckmann, D., Schwartz, T., Brandherm, B., Schmitz, M., Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M., 2005. GUMO - The General User Model Ontology. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrovic, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modelling, July 2005, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 428-437.
15. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M., 2003. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission, 21 May 2004.
16. Kalyan, A., Gopalan, S., 2005. Hybrid Context Model based on Multilevel Situation Theory and Ontology for Contact Centers. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, March 2005, Hawaii. pp. 3-7.
17. Larsen H., and Yager R. The use of fuzzy relational thesauri for classificatory problem solving in information retrieval and expert systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23 (1993) 31-41
18. Levesque H., Pirri F., and Reiter R. Foundations for the situation calculus. Computer and Information Science 3 18 (1998)
19. Maedche, A., Zacharias, V., 2002. Clustering Ontology-based Metadata in the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, August 2002, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 348-360.
20. Matheus, M., Kokar, K., Baclawski, J., Letkowski, C., 2004. The Practical Application of Semantic Web Technologies for Situation Awareness. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, October 2004, Arlington, US.
21. Meissen, U., Pfennigschmidt, S., Voisard, A., Wahnfried, T., 2005. Matching System Knowledge and User Expectations in Situation-aware Systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Services, July 2005, Santorini, Greece. pp. 271-278.
22. Michael R., and Funder D. Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality 38 (2004) 421-447
23. Mrohs, B., Luther, M., Vaidya, R., Wagner, M., Steglich, S., Kellerer, W., Arbanowski, S., 2005. OWL-SF-A Distributed Semantic Service Framework. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context Awareness for Proactive Systems, June 2005, Helsinki, Finland. pp. 66-78.
24. Padovitz, A., Loke, S., Zaslavsky, A., Burg, B., and Bartolini, C., 2005. An approach to Data Fusion for Context-Awareness, In: Dey, A., Kokinov, B., Leake, D., Turner, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Modeling and Using Context, July 2005, LNAI 3554, Paris. pp. 353-367.
25. Raymond, S., Sonenberg, L., 2004. Situation Awareness in Intelligent Agents: Foundations for a Theory of Proactive Agent Behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, September 2004, Beijing, China. pp. 86-92.
26. Reiter R. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
27. Resnik, P., 1995. Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI, 1995. pp. 448-453.
28. Rodriguez M., and Egenhofer M. Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15 2 (2003) 442-456
29. Santini S., and Jain R. Similarity Measures. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 21 9 (1999) 871-883
30. Simons P. Parts, A Study in Ontology (1987), Clarendon Press, Oxford
31. Speel, P., Patel-Schneider, P., 1994. A whole-part extension for description logics. In: Guarino, N., Pribbenow, S., Vieu, L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Parts and Wholes of the ECAI-94, 1994. pp. 111-121.
32. Tversky A. Features of Similarity. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 327-352
33. Vosniadou S., and Andrew O. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (1989), Cambridge University Press, New York
34. Weiser M., and Brown J.S. Designing Calm Technology. PowerGrid Journal 1 1 (1996)
35. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8 (1965) 338-353
36. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1 (1978) 3-28