Dynamic course of intracortical TMS paired-pulse responses during recovery of motor function after stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 568-573

  Wittenberg, George F ^a,b   Bastings, Eric P ^a   Fowlkes, Allison M ^a   Morgan, Timothy M ^a   Good, David C ^a   Pons, Timothy P ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Human; Motor recovery; Stroke; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FACILITATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND MUSCLE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

AGED; CEREBRAL INFARCTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURAL INHIBITION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 35348880848     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307302438     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ahonen JP, Jehkonen M., Dastidar P., et al. Cortical silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998 ; 109: 224-9.
2. Braune HJ, Fritz C. Asymmetry of silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 1996 ; 93: 168-74.
3. Kujirai T., Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1993 ; 471: 501-19.
4. Thomson AM, Deuchars J. Synaptic interactions in neocortical local circuits: dual intracellular recordings in vitro. Cereb Cortex 1997 ; 7: 510-22.
5. Liepert J., Storch P., Fritsch A., et al. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2000 ; 111: 671-6.
6. Manganotti P., Patuzzo S., Cortese F., et al. Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2002 ; 113: 936-43.
7. Liepert J., Hamzei F., Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle Nerve 2000 ; 23: 1761-3.
8. Shimizu T., Hosaki A., Hino T., et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain 2002 ; 125: 1896-1907.
9. Cicinelli P., Pasqualetti P., Zaccagnini M., et al. Interhemispheric asymmetries of motor cortex excitability in the postacute stroke stage: a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Stroke 2003 ; 34: 2653-8.
10. Bütefisch CM, Netz J., Weßling M., et al. Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain 2003 ; 126: 470-81.
11. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A., et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994 ; 91: 79-92.
12. Heller A., Wade DT, Wood VA, et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987 ; 50: 714-9.
13. McConnell KA, Nahas Z., Shastri A., et al. The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex. Biol Psychiatry 2001 ; 49: 454-9.
14. Kozel FA, Nahas Z., deBrux C., et al. How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000 ; 12: 376-84.
15. Wittenberg G., Bastings E., Scales C., et al. Evolution of TMS motor maps during recovery after stroke. NeuroImage 2001 ; 13: S1281.
16. Dobkin BH Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007 ; 21: 3-13.
17. Delvaux V., Alagona G., Gerard P., et al. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2003 ; 114: 1217-25.
18. Di Lazzaro V., Oliviero A., Profice P., et al. Motor cortex excitability changes within 8 hours after ischaemic stroke may predict the functional outcome. Eur J Emerg Med 1999 ; 6: 119-21.
19. Catano A., Houa M., Caroyer JM, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in acute stroke: early excitation threshold and functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996 ; 101: 233-9.
20. Binkofski F., Seitz RJ, Arnold S., et al. Thalamic metabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol 1996 ; 39: 460-70.
21. Rapisarda G., Bastings E., de Noordhout AM, et al. Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke 1996 ; 27: 2191-6.
22. Nardone R., Tezzon F. Inhibitory and excitatory circuits of cerebral cortex after ischaemic stroke: prognostic value of the transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2002 ; 42: 131-6.
23. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer ; 2000.