The influence of men's sexual strategies on perceptions of women's bodily attractiveness, health and fertility

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 98-107

  Swami, Viren ^a   Miller, Rebecca ^b   Furnham, Adrian ^b   Penke, Lars ^c   Tovée, Martin J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Physical attractiveness; Sexual strategies; Waist to hip ratio

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348817345     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.017     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Asendorpf J.B., and Penke L. A mature evolutionary psychology demands careful conclusions about sex differences. Behavioral and Brain Science 28 (2005) 275-276
2. Brase G.L., and Walker G. Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios. Human Nature 15 (2004) 209-224
3. Buss D.M. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (1999), Allyn & Bacon, Boston
4. Buss D.M., and Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 204-232
5. Eagly E.H., Ashmore R.D., Makhijani M.G., and Longo L.C. What is beautiful is good, but.. A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin 110 (1991) 109-128
6. Fan J., Liu F., Wu J., and Dai W. Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271 (2004) 347-352
7. Fletcher G.J.O., Simpson J.A., Thomas G., and Giles L. Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 72-89
8. Furnham A., Moutafi J., and Baguma P. A cross-cultural study on the role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women's attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 32 (2002) 729-745
9. Furnham A., Swami V., and Shah K. Female body correlates of attractiveness and other ratings. Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 443-454
10. Gangestad S.W., Haselton M.G., and Buss D.M. Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry 17 (2006) 75-95
11. Gangestad S.W., and Simpson J.A. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2000) 573-587
12. Kenrick D.T., Li N.P., and Butner J. Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review 110 (2003) 3-28
13. Kenrick D.T., Sadalla E.K., Groth G., and Trost M.R. Evolution, traits and the stages of human courtship: Qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality 58 (1990) 97-117
14. Maner J.K., Galliot M.T., and DeWall C.N. Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (2007) 28-36
15. Maner J.K., Kenrick D.T., Becker D., Delton A.W., Hofer B., Wilbur C.J., et al. Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 1107-1120
16. Marlowe F., and Wetsman A. Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and Individual Differences 30 (2001) 481-489
17. Nelson L.D., and Morrison E.L. The symptoms of resource scarcity: Judgements of food and finances influence preference for potential partners. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 167-173
18. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (in press). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.
19. Penke, L., Todd, P. M., Lenton, A. P., & Fasolo, B. (in press). How self-referential cognitions can guide human mating decisions. In G. Geher, & G. F. Miller (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind's reproductive system. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Regan P.C. What if you can't get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (1998) 1294-1303
21. Schmalt H.-D. Waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness: The moderating role of power motivation and the mating context. Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 455-465
22. Simpson J.A., and Gangestad S.W. Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1991) 870-883
23. Simpson J.A., and Gangestad S.W. Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality 60 (1992) 31-51
24. Simpson J.A., and Oriña M. Strategic pluralism and context-specific mate preferences in humans. In: Sterelny K., and Fitness J. (Eds). From mating to mentality (2003), Psychology Press, London 39-70
25. Simpson J.A., Wilson C.L., and Winterheld H.A. Sociosexuality and romantic relationships. In: Harvey J.H., Wenzel A., and Sprecher S. (Eds). Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (2004), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 87-112
26. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (1993) 292-307
27. Singh D. Universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 33 (2006) 359-370
28. Singh D., and Young R.K. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology 16 (1995) 483-507
29. Smith K.L., Cornelissen P.L., and Tovée M.J. Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 28 (2007) 48-54
30. Streeter S.A., and McBurney D. Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: New evidence and a critique for a 'critical test'. Evolution and Human Behaviour 24 (2003) 88-98
31. Sugiyama L.S. Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior 25 (2004) 51-62
32. Swami V. The missing arms of Vénus de Milo: Reflections on the science of physical attractiveness (2007), Book Guild, Brighton
33. Swami V., Antonakopoulos N., Tovée M.J., and Furnham A. A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles 54 (2006) 201-211
34. Swami V., Caprario C., Tovée M.J., and Furnham A. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality 20 (2006) 69-81
35. Swami V., and Furnham A. The science of attraction. The Psychologist 19 (2006) 362-365
36. Swami V., and Furnham A. The psychology of physical attraction (2007), Routledge, London
37. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (in press). Is love really so blind? The Psychologist.
38. Swami V., Greven C., and Furnham A. More than just skin-deep? A pilot study integrating physical and non-physical factors in the perception of physical attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 42 (2007) 563-572
39. Swami V., Knight D., Tovée M.J., Davies P., and Furnham A. Perceptions of female body size in Britain and the South Pacific. Body Image 4 (2007) 219-223
40. Swami, V., Neto, F., Tovée, M. J., & Furnham, A. (in press). Preference for female body weight and shape in three European countries. European Psychologist.
41. Swami V., Poulogianni K., and Furnham A. The influence of resource availability on preferences for human body weight and non-human objects. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis 4 (2006) 17-28
42. Swami V., and Tovée M.J. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image 2 (2005) 115-128
43. Swami V., and Tovée M.J. Does hunger influence judgements of female physical attractiveness?. British Journal of Psychology 97 (2006) 353-363
44. Swami V., and Tovée M.J. Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 48 (2007) 43-50
45. Tovée M.J., and Cornelissen P.L. Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology 92 (2001) 391-402
46. Tovée M.J., Hancock P., Mahmoodi S., Singleton B.R.R., and Cornelissen P.L. Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of body shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269 (2002) 2205-2213
47. Tovée M.J., Maisey D.S., Emery J.L., and Cornelissen P.L. Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266 (1999) 211-218
48. Tovée M.J., Swami V., Furnham A., and Mangalparsad R. Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior 27 (2006) 443-456
49. Voracek M. Shortcomings of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory: Can psychometrics inform evolutionary psychology?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2005) 296-297
50. Voracek M., and Fisher M.L. Success is all in the measures: Androgenousness, curvaceousness and starring frequencies in adult media actresses. Archives of Sexual Behavior 35 (2006) 297-304
51. Wetsman A., and Marlowe F. How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior 20 (1999) 219-228
52. Yu D.W., and Shepard G.H. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?. Nature 396 (1998) 321-322
53. Yu D.W., and Shepard G.H. The mystery of female beauty - Reply. Nature 399 (1999) 216