Specifying organizational contexts: Systematic links between contexts and processes in organizational behavior

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 859-863

  Griffin, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348814510     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.489     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. D. (1991). The missing role of context in OB: The need for a meso-level approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 55-110.
2. Daniels, K., Tregaskis, O., & Seaton, J. S. (2007). Job control and occupational health: The moderating role of national R&D activity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 1-19. DOI: 10.1002/job.390
3. Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2004). Enriching goal setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review, 3, 404-422.
4. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 4, 657-684.
5. Hackman, J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 905-922.
6. Heath, C., & Sitkin, S. B. (2001). Big-B versus Big-O: What is organizational about organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 43-58.
7. Johns, G. (1991). Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 80-104.
8. Johns, G. (1993). Constraints on the adoption of psychology-based personnel practices: Lesson from organizational innovation. Personnel Psychology, 46, 569-592.
9. Johns, G. (2001). In praise of context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 31-42.
10. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408.
11. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein (Ed.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Mariano, L. T., & Setodji, C. (2007). Bayesian methods for scalable multivariate value-added assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32, 125-150.
13. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in Organizational Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172.
14. Merleau Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York: Humanities.
15. Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195-229.
16. Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-13.
17. Shapiro, D. L., Von Glinow, M. A., & Xiao, Z. (2007). Toward polycontextually sensitive research methods. Management and Organization Review, 3, 129-152.
18. Wall, T. D., Cordery, J. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2002). Empowerment, performance, and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 146-169.