Some fatigue damage measures for longitudinal elements based on the Wöhler field

Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1063-1075

  Castillo, Enrique ^a,b   Fernandez Canteli A ^c   Lopez Aenlle M ^c   Ruiz Ripoll, M L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Damage measure; Fatigue; Load history; Weibull models; W hler field

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; RANDOM VARIABLES; STATISTICAL METHODS; STRESS MEASUREMENT; STRESSES; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

FATIGUE DAMAGE MEASURES; REFERENCE RANDOM VARIABLES; REFERENCE STRESS LEVEL; WEIBULL MODELS;

FATIGUE DAMAGE;

EID: 35348813732     PISSN: 8756758X     EISSN: 14602695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01176.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ASTM (1981) Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM STP 744, (Eds R. E. Little and J. C. Ekvall), The American Society for Testing and Materials.
2. Coleman, B. D. (1958) Statistics and time dependence of mechanical breakdown in fibers. J. Appl. Phy. 29, 968-983.
3. Bastenaire F. A. (1972) New method for the statistical evaluation of constant stress amplitude fatigue-test results, In: Probabilistic Aspects of Fatigue, ASTM STP 511, 3-28.
4. Lawless, J. F. (1982) Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Spindel J. E. and Haibach E. (1981) Some considerations in the statistical determination of the shape of S-N curves. In: Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data, ASTM STP 744, (Eds R. E. Little and J. C. Ekvall), American Society for Testing and Materials, 89-113.
6. Pascual, F. G. and Meeker, W. Q. (1999) Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue-limit model. Technometrics, 41, 277-302.
7. Castillo, E., López-Aenlle, M., Ramos, A., Fernández-Canteli, A., Kieselbach, R. and Esslinger, V. (2006) Specimen length effect on parameter estimation in modelling fatigue strength by Weibull distribution. Int. J. Fatigue, 28, 1047-1058.
8. ASTM Standard E1049-85 (1985) Standard Practices for Cycle Counting in Fatigue Analysis, Philadelphia, PA.
9. Collins J. A. (1993) Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design, John Wiley, New York.
10. Lemaitre, J. (1992) A course on Damage Mechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
11. Lemaitre, J., Sermage, J. P. and Desmorat, R. (1999) A two scale damage concept applied to fatigue. Int. J. Fract. 97, 67-81.
12. Yaacoub Agha, H., Béranger, A. S., Billardon, R. and Hild, F. (1998) High-cycle fatigue behavior of spheroidal graphite cast iron. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 21, 287-296.
13. Chantier, I., Bobet, V., Billardon, R., and Hild, F. (2000) A probabilistic approach to predict the very high-cycle fatigue behaviour of spheroidal graphite cast iron structures. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 23, 173-180.
14. Miner M. A. (1945) Cumulative damage in fatigue. J. Appl. Mech. 12, pp. A159-A164.
15. Palmgren A. (1924) Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern. Ver. deut. Ingr. 68, 339-341.
16. Castillo E. (1988) Extreme Value Theory in Engineering, Academic Press, Boston.
17. Castillo E., Fernández, Canteli A., Esslinger V. and Thürlimann B. (1985) Statistical model for fatigue analysis of wires, strands and cables. IABSE Periodica, 1
18. Castillo, E., Hadi, A. S., Balakrishnan, N. and Sarabia J. M. (2004) Extreme Value and Related Models with Applications in Engineering and Science. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
19. Castillo, E., Iglesias, A. and Ruiz-Cobo, R. (2004) Functional Equations in Applied Sciences. Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 199, Elsevier.
20. Castillo, E. and Hadi, A. S. (1995) Modelling lifetime data with applications to fatigue models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1041-1054.
21. Castillo, E., Fernández, Canteli A., Hadi, A. S. and López-Aenlle, M. (2007) A Fatigue model with local sensitivity analysis. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 30, 149-168.
22. Castillo, E. and Galambos, J. (1987) Lifetime regression models based on a functional equation of physical nature. J. Appl. Probability 24, 160-169.
23. Conway J. B. and Sjodahlo L. H. (1991) Analysis and representation of fatigue data, ASM International, Cincinatti.
24. Dowling N. E. and Thangjitham S. (2000) An overview and discussion of basic methodology for fatigue. Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, 31st Volume, ASTM STP 1389, pp. 3-36.
25. Fernández-Canteli A. (1982) Statistical Interpretation of the Miner-number Using an Index of Total Damage. IBASE Colloquium, Lausanne.
26. Fernández-Canteli A., Lamela M. J., García Prieto M. A. and Castillo E. (1997) Sobre la evaluación de resultados dispersos de fatiga, estadísticamente no-homogéneos. Anal. Mec. Fract. 14, 219-224.
27. Castillo, E., Fernández-Canteli, A. and Hadi, A. S. (1999) On Fitting a Fatigue Model to Data. Int. J. Fatigue 21, 97-106.