Multiscale tomography of buried magnetic structures: Its use in the localization and characterization of archaeological structures

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 171, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 87-103

  Saracco, Ginette ^a   Moreau, Frédérique ^b   Mathé, Pierre Etienne ^a   Hermitte, Daniel ^a   Michel, Jean Marie ^c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^c INRAP   (France)

Author keywords

Complex dipolar occurrence tomography; Complex wavelet transform; Electrical resistivity; Inverse problem in potential field; Magnetic anomalies; Multiscale tomography

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC PROPERTY; TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSFORM;

EID: 35248884292     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03501.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alexandrescu, M., Gibert, D., Hulot, G., Lemouel, J.L. & Saracco, G., 1995. Detection of geomagnetic jerks using wavelet analysis, J. geophys. Res., 101(B10), 21 975-21 994.
2. Blakely, R.-J., 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
3. Brizzolari, E., Ermolli, F., Orlando, L., Piro, S. & Versino, L., 1994. Integrated geophysical methods in archaeological surveys, J. appl. Geophys., 29, 47-55.
4. Courant, R. & Hilbert, D., 1962. Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2, Intersciences Publisher, J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Corwin, R.F., 1990. The self-potential method for environmental and engineering applications, Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Vol. 1, Review and Tutorial, pp. 127-146, ed. Ward, S.H., Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, USA.
6. Durrheim, R.J. & Cooper, G.R.-J., 1998. EULDEP: A program for the Euler deconvolution of magnetic and gravity data, Comput. Geosci., 24, 545-550.
7. Delprat, N., Escudie, B., Guillemain, P., Kronland-Martinet, R., Tchamitchian, P. & Torresani, B., 1991, Tech. rep. CPT-91, no P. 2512, Luminy, Marseille, France.
8. Grossmann, A., 1986. Wavelet transforms and edge detection, in Stochastic Process in Physics & Eng., pp. 149-157, eds Blanchard, P., Streit, L. & Hazewinkel, M., Reidel Pub. Co., New York.
9. Grossmann, A. & Morlet, J., 1984. Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape, Soc. Int. Am. Math. J. Anal., 15, 723-736.
10. Grossmann, A., Holschneider, M., Kronland-Martinet, R. & Morlet, J., 1987. Detection of abrupt changes in sound signals with the help of wavelet transforms, in Inverse Problem: An Interdisciplinary Study, Vol. 19, Adv. Elect. Phys. Supp., pp. 289-306, Academic Press, San Diego.
11. Guillemain, P., 1994. Estimation de lignes spectrales par transformée en ondelettes: Application aux signaux de spectroscopie RMN, Thèse, Univ. Aix-Marseille II, Marseille, France.
12. Hornby, P., Boschetti, F. & Horowitz, F.G., 1999. Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain, Geophys. J. Int., 137, 175-196.
13. Ishido, T. & Pritchett, J.W., 1999. Numerical simulation of electrokinetic potential associated with subsurface flow, J. geophys. Res., 104, 15 247-15 259.
14. Jeng, Y., Lee, Y.L., Chen, C.-Y. & Lin, M-J, 2003. Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archeology, J. appl. Geophys., 53, 31-48.
15. Lapenna, V., Patella, D. & Piscitelli, S., 2000. Tomographic analysis of self-potential data in a seismic area of Southern Italy, Annali di Geofisica, 43, 361-373.
16. Mallat, S. & Hwang, W.L., 1992. Singularity detection and processing with wavelets, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory., 38, 617-643.
17. Martelet, G., Sailhac, P., Moreau, F. & Diament, M., 2001. Characterization of geological boundaries using 1D wavelet transform on gravity data, theory and application to the Himalayas, Geophysics, 66, 1116-1129.
18. Marson, I. & Klingele, E.E., 1993. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation, Geophysics, 58(11), 1588-95.
19. Mauriello, P. & Patella, D., 1999. Principles of probability tomography for natural-source electromagnetic induction fields, Geophysics, 64(5), 1403-1417.
20. Mauriello, P., Monna, D. & Patella, D., 1998. 3D geoelectic tomography and archeological applications, Geophys. Prospect., 46, 543-570.
21. Moreau, F., 1995. Méthodes de traitement de données géophysiques par transformée en ondelettes, Thèse, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France.
22. Moreau, F., Gibert, D., Holschneider, M. & Saracco, G., 1997. Wavelet analysis of potential fields, Inv. Probl., 13, 165-178.
23. Moreau, F., Gibert, D., Holschneider, M. & Saracco, G., 1999. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Basic theory, J. geophys. Res., 104, 5003-5013.
24. Nabighian, M.N., 1984. Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophysics, 49(6), 780-786.
25. Noel, M. & Xu, B., 1991. Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: A preliminary study, Geophys. J. int., 107, 95-62.
26. Papoulis, A., 1984. Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York.
27. Parker, R.L., 1994. Geophysical Inverse Theory, Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey.
28. Parker, R.L. & Huestis, S.P., 1974. The inversion of magnetic anomalies in the presence of topographic effect, J. geophys. Res., 79, 1587-1593.
29. Patella, D., 1997. Introduction to ground surface self potential tomography, Geophys. Prospect., 45, 653-681.
30. Ravat, D., 1996. Analysis of Euler method and applicability in environmental magnetic investigations, J. Elect. E G, 1(3), 229-238.
31. Reid, A.B., Allsop, J.M., Granser, H., Millett, A.J. & Somertom, I.W., 1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics, 55(1), 80-91.
32. Sabatier, P.C. (Ed.), 1987. Inverse Problem: An Interdisciplinary Study, Academic Press, London.
33. Sailhac, P. & Marquis, G., 2001. Analytic potentials for the forward and inverse modeling of SP anomalies caused by subsurface fluid flow, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1851-1854.
34. Saracco, G., 1989. Acoustic propagation of harmonic and transient signals through an inhomogeneous medium: Asymptotic methods and Wavelet transforms, Thèse de Doctorat, University of Luminy, Marseille, France.
35. Saracco, G., Gazanhes, C., Sageloli, J. & Sessarego, J.P., 1990a. Time-scale analysis of acoustic scattering by elastic spherical shells for impulse sources, J. Acoust., vol. 3(4), 381-392.
36. Saracco, G., Guillemain, P. & Kronland-Martinet, R., 1990b. Characterization of elastic shells by the use of wavelet transform, IEEE- Ultrasonic Symp., 2, 881-885.
37. Saracco, G., Labazuy, P. & Moreau, F., 2004. Localisation of self-potential sources in volcano-electric effect with complex continuous wavelet transform and electrical tomography methods for an active volcano, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 L12610, doi 10.1029/2004GL01954
38. Saracco, G., Sessarego, J.P., Sageloli, J., Guillemain, P. & Kronland-Martinet, K., 1991. Extraction of modulation laws of elastic shells by the use of the wavelet transform, pp. 61-68, Research notes in Applied Mathematics, series eds Ciarlet, P.J. & Lions, J.L., Wavelets and Applications, ed. Meyer, Y., Masson-Springer-Verlag, Paris.
39. Tarantola, A., 1987. Inverse Problems Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation, Elsevier, New York.
40. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., Sheriff, R.E. & Keys D.A., 1990. Applied Geophysics, 2nd ed., 770 p., Cambridge University Press, New York.
41. Thompson, D.T., 1982. Euldph: A new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47(1), 31-37.
42. Tsokas, G.N. & Papazachos, C.B., 1992. Two dimensional inversion filters in magnetic prospecting: Application to the exploration for buried antiquities, Geophysics, 57, 1004-1113.
43. Zhdanov, M.S. & Keller, G.V., 1994. The Geoelectrical Methods in Geophysical Exploration, Elsevier, New York.