Trustworthiness in evaluation practice: An emphasis on the relational

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 404-409

  Rallis, Sharon F ^a   Rossman, Gretchen B ^a   Gajda, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross cultural competence; Ethical evaluation practice; Trustworthiness

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL INFLUENCE; ETHICS; PLANNING PRACTICE;

ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER; CULTURAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; ETHICS; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMED CONSENT; MALAWI; MORALITY; POLICY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARD; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

BATTERED WOMEN; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALAWI; MORALS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIAL VALUES; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35248877212     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alexander B.K. Performance ethnography: The reenacting and inciting of culture. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. (2005), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 411-441
2. American Evaluation Association. (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators (revised). Retrieved January 16, 2007 from 〈http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp〉.
3. Gunzenhauser M.G. A moral epistemology of knowing subjects: Theorizing a relational turn for qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 3 (2006) 621-647
4. Lincoln Y.S., and Guba E.G. Naturalistic inquiry (1985), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
5. Rallis, S. F. (2006a). Considering rigor and probity: Qualitative pathways to credible evidence. In Invited paper presented at What Constitutes Credible Evidence in Evaluation and Applied Research? The Claremont Graduate University Stauffer Symposium, Claremont, CA, August.
6. Rallis, S. F. (2006b). A litmus test for scientifically-based research in education: Reasoning with rigor and probity. In Invited plenary at annual meetings of the Northeast Education Research Association, Hudson Valley, NY, October.
7. Rallis, S. F. & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Plenary session: Innovation and Emergence in Qualitative Evaluation. In Invited performance at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Reno, NV, November.
8. Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2004). Trustworthiness: Beyond procedures to probity. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April.
9. Rallis, S. F., Rossman, G. B. & Gajda, R. (2006). Trustworthiness: Beyond procedures to probity. In L. Goodyear (Chair), Beyond the guiding principles for evaluators: Professional ethics, cultural norms and trustworthiness in evaluation. Panel at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Portland, OR, November.
10. Rambo C. Handing IRB an unloaded gun. Qualitative Inquiry 13 3 (2007) 353-367
11. Rawls J. A theory of justice (1971), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Rossman G.B., and Rallis S.F. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
13. Rossman G.B., and Rallis S.F. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. 2nd ed. (2003), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Sieber J. Informed consent. The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods Vol. 2 (2004), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (pp. 493-497)