Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues (L)

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1336-1339

  Gilbert, Gaëtan ^a,b   Bergeras, Isabelle ^a   Voillery, Doroth́e ^a   Lorenzi, Christian ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIGNAL ENCODING; SPEECH CODING; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

LOW INTERRUPTION RATES; MODULATION MASKING; SPEECH SIGNALS;

SPEECH ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; CUES; HEARING; HUMANS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 35248833747     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2756161     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bashford, Jr., J. A., Riener, K. R., and Warren, R. M. (1992). " Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations., " Percept. Psychophys. 51, 211-217.
2. Drullman, R., Festen, J. M., and Plomp, R. (1994). " Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2670-2680.
3. Ghitza, O. (2001). " On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1628-1640.
4. Gilbert, G., and Lorenzi, C. (2006). " The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2438-2444.
5. Kwon, B. J., and Turner, C. W. (2001). " Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1130-1140.
6. Lorenzi, C., Gilbert, G., Carn, H., Garnier, S., and Moore, B. C. J. (2006). " Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure., " Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 18866-18869.
7. Nelson, P. B., and Jin, S. H. (2004). " Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 2286-2294.
8. Shannon, R., Zeng, F-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). " Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues., " Science 270, 303-304.
9. Sheft, S., and Yost, W. A. (2006). " Modulation detection interference as informational masking., " in Hearing-from Basic Research to Applications, edited by, B. Kollmeier,,, G. Klump,,, V. Hohmann,,, U. Langemann,,, S. Uppenkamp,, and, J. Verhey, (Springer Verlag, New York).
10. Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., and Oxenham, A. J. (2002). " Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception., " Nature (London) 416, 87-90.
11. Zeng, F. G., Nie, K., Liu, S., Stickney, G., Del Rio, E., Kong, Y. Y., and Chen, H. (2004). " On the dichotomy in the auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 1351-1354.