On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues (L)

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1351-1354

  Zeng, Fan Gang ^a   Nie, Kaibao ^a   Liu, Sheng ^a   Stickney, Ginger ^a   Del Rio, Elsa ^a   Kong, Ying Yee ^a   Chen, Hongbin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ACOUSTIC INTENSITY; ALGORITHMS; AUDITION; SPEECH PROCESSING; WAVE FILTERS;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FREQUENCY BANDS; SENSORY SYSTEMS;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ALGORITHM; ASSOCIATION; COCHLEA; CONFERENCE PAPER; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FREQUENCY ANALYZER; HEARING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEA; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3142531833     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.1777938     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Drullman, R. (1995). "Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility," J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 97, 585-592.
2. French, N. R., and Steinberg, J. C. (1947). "Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 90-119.
3. Ghitza, O. (2001). "On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1628-1640.
4. Hong, R. S., Rubinstein, J. T., Wehner, D., and Horn, D. (2003). "Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants," Otol. Neurotol. 24, 590-595.
5. Irino, T., and Patterson, R. D. (2001). "A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2008-2022.
6. Liberman, A. M., and Mattingly, I. G. (1989). "A specialization for speech perception," Science 243, 489-494.
7. Licklider, J. C. R. (1951). "A Duplex Theory of Pitch Perception," Experientia 7, 128-134.
8. Licklider, J. C. R., and Pollack, I. (1948). "Effects of differentiation, integration, and infinite peak clipping on the intelligibility of speech," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20, 42-51.
9. Litvak, L. M., Delgutte, B., and Eddington, D. K. (2003). "Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2079-2098.
10. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D., and Sullivan, J. A. (1994). "Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1085-1099.
11. Oppenheim, A. V., and Lim, J. S. (1981). "The importance of phase in signals," Proc. IEEE 69, 529-541.
12. Rayleigh, L. (1907). "On our perception of sound direction," Philos. Mag. 13, 214-232.
13. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). "Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues," Science 270, 303-304.
14. Smith, Z. M., Delgutte, B., and Oxenham, A. J. (2002). "Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception," Nature (London) 416, 87-90.
15. Stevens, S. (1935). "The relation of pitch to intensity," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 6, 150-154.
16. Tian, B., Reser, D., Durham, A., Kustov, A., and Rauschecker, J. P. (2001). "Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex," Science 292, 290-293.
17. Van Tasell, D. J., Soli, S. D., Kirby, V. M., and Widin, G. P. (1987). "Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1152-1161.
18. Xu, L., and Pfingst, B. E. (2003). "Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 3024-3027.