The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups

Memory

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 746-754

  Wright, Daniel B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EPISODIC MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDENTIFICATION KEY; LEGAL ASPECT; OFFENDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECALL BIAS; VISUAL MEMORY;

CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; ODDS RATIO; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 35248831144     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210701508401     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical data analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
2. Behrman, B. W. and Davey, S. L. (2001) Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25, pp. 475-491.
3. Cohen, J. (1994) The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, pp. 997-1003.
4. Ebbesen, E. B. and Flowe, H. D. Simultaneous v. sequential lineups: Factors preventing generalization of findings from the laboratory to the field
5. Hilgard, E. R. (1953) Introduction to psychology, Harcourt, Brace & Company, New York
6. Kebbell, M. R. (2000) The law concerning the conduct of lineups in England and Wales: How well does it satisfy the recommendations of the American Psychology-Law Society?. Law and Human Behavior, 24, pp. 309-315.
7. Kraemer, H. C. (2004) Reconsidering the odds ratio as a measure of 2 × 2 association in a population. Statistics in Medicine, 23, pp. 257-270.
8. Levi, A. M. (1998) Are defendants guilty if they were chosen in a lineup?. Law and Human Behavior, 22, pp. 389-407.
9. Lindsay, R. C. L. and Wells, G. L. (1985) Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, pp. 556-564.
10. Loftus, E. F. (1974) Reconstructing memory: The incredible eyewitness. Psychology Today, 8, pp. 116-119.
11. Loftus, E. F. and Ketcham, K. (1991) Witness for the defense: The accused, the eyewitness, and the expert who put memory on trial, St. Martin's Press, New York
12. Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F. and MacLin, O. H. (2005) Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 33, pp. 783-792.
13. Penrod, S. (2003) Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing?. Criminal Justice Magazine, 54, pp. 36-47.
14. Perrotta, T. Police lineup rules questioned by judge: Says court can require "double blind" technique
15. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P. and Dwyer, J. (2003) Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right, New American Library, New York
16. Steblay, N. M., Dysart, J., Fulero, S. and Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001) Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, pp. 459-474.
17. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence (1999) Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement (NCJ No. 178240), US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC
18. Tredoux, C. G. (1999) Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup sise and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp. S9-S26.
19. Valentine, T., Pickering, A. and Darling, S. (2003) Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, pp. 969-993.
20. Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W. and Fulero, S. (2000) From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, pp. 581-598.
21. Wells, G. L. and Olson, E. (2002) Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, pp. 155-167.
22. Wells, G. L. and Olson, E. (2003) Eyewitness identification. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, pp. 277-295.
23. Wells, G. L. and Windschitl, P. D. (1999) Stimulus sampling in social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, pp. 1115-1125.
24. Wilkinson, L. and the Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific Affairs (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, pp. 594-604.
25. Willing, R. Police lineups encourage wrong picks, experts say. USA Today
26. Wright, D. B. (2003) Making friends with your data: Improving how statistics are conducted and reported. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp. 123-136.
27. Wright, D. B. and Davies, G. M. (2007) Eyewitness testimony. Handbook of applied cognition, pp. 763-786. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
28. Wright, D. B. and Hall, M. (2007) How a "reasonable doubt" instruction affects decisions of guilt. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, pp. 85-92.
29. Wright, D. B. and McDaid, A. T. (1996) Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, pp. 75-84.