Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 262-266

  Boudreau, Denise M ^a,b   Luce, Casey L ^a   Ludman, Evette ^a,b   Bonomi, Amy E ^c   Fishman, Paul A ^a,b  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Guideline adherence; Health maintenance organization; Mammography; Methods; Prevalence; Quality indicators; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PILOT PROJECTS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREVALENCE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON;

EID: 35248829607     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersen M.R., Yasui Y., Meischke H., Kuniyuki A., Etzioni R., and Urban N. The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am. J. Prev. Med. 18 3 (2000) 199-207
2. Augustson E.M., Vadaparampil S.T., Paltoo D.N., Kidd L.R., and O'Malley A.S. Association between CBE, FOBT, and Pap smear adherence and mammography adherence among older low-income women. Prev. Med. 36 (2003) 734-739
3. Barr J.K., Franks A.L., Lee N.C., Herther P., and Schachter M. Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening. Prev. Med. 33 6 (2001) 661-667
4. Bobo J.K., Shapiro J.A., Schulman J., and Wolters C.L. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 13 (2004) 620-630
5. Calvocoressi L., Kasl S.V., Lee C.H., Stolar M., Claus E.B., and Jones B.A. A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White omen ages 40 to 79 years. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 13 12 (2004) 2096-2105
6. Calvocoressi L., Stolar M., Kasl S.V., Claus E.B., and Jones B.A. Applying recursive partitioning to a prospective study of factors associated with adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Am. J. Epidemiol. 162 12 (2005) 1215-1224
7. Carney P.A., Harwood B.G., Weiss J.E., Eliassen M.S., and Goodrich M.E. Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of New Hampshire women. Cancer 95 2 (2002) 219-227
8. Clark M.A., Rakowski W., and Bonacore L.B. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment. Ann. Behav. Med. 26 3 (2003) 201-211
9. Costanza M.E., Stoddard A.M., Luckmann R., White M.J., Spitz Avrunin J., and Clemow L. Promoting mammography: results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am. J. Prev. Med. 19 1 (2000) 39-44
10. Crane L.A., Leakey T.A., Rimer B.K., Wolfe P., Woodworth M.A., and Warnecke R.B. Effectiveness of a telephone outcall intervention to promote screening mammography among low-income women. Prev. Med. 27 5 Pt 2 (1998) S39-S49
11. Davis N.A., Lewis M.J., Rimer B.K., Harvey C.M., and Koplan J.P. Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan. Am. J. Health Promot. 11 4 (1997) 247-249
12. Engelman K.K., Ellerbeck E.F., Mayo M.S., Markello S.J., and Ahluwalia J.S. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries. Prev. Med. 39 3 (2004) 491-497 Sep
13. Feldstein A.C., Vogt T.M., Aickin M., and Hu W.R. Mammography screening rates decline: a person-time approach to evaluation. Prev. Med. 43 3 (2006) 178-182 Sep
14. Fletcher S.W., Black W., Harris R., Rimer B.K., and Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85 20 (1993) 1644-1656 Oct. 20
15. Fox S.A., Pitkin K., Paul C., Carson S., and Duan N. Breast cancer screening adherence: does church attendance matter?. Health Educ. Behav. 25 6 (1998) 742-758
16. Gilliland F.D., Rosenberg R.D., Hunt W.C., Stauber P., and Key C.R. Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, 1994-1997. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152 5 (2000) 432-437 Sep. 1
17. Hansen J.P., Knapp P.A., and Newcomb PA. Mammography in a health maintenance organization. Am. J. Public Health 81 11 (1991) 1489-1490
18. Humphrey L.L., Helfand M., Chan B.K.S., and Woolf S.H. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 137 (2002) 347-360
19. Humphrey L.L., Helfand M., Chan B.K.S., and Woolf S.H. Breast cancer screening. Summary of the evidence. Ann. Intern. Med. 137 (2002) 344-346
20. Jepson C., Barudin J., and Weiner J. Variability in timing of repeat screening mammography. Prev. Med. 26 (1997) 483-485
21. King E.S., Rimer B.K., Seay J., Balshem A., and Engstrom P.F. Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective?. Am. J. Public Health 84 (1994) 104-106
22. Lee J., and Vogel V. Who used repeat screening mammography regularly?. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 4 8 (1995) 901-906
23. Partin M.R., and Slater J.S. Promoting repeat mammography use: insights from a systematic needs assessment. Health Educ. Behav. 30 1 (2003) 97-112
24. Partin M.R., Casey-Paal A.L., Slater J.S., and Korn J.E. Measuring mammography compliance: lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 7 (1998) 681-687
25. Partin M.R., Slater J.S., and Caplan L. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results. Prev. Med. 41 3-4 (2005) 734-740
26. Rakowski W., Andersen M.R., Stoddard A.M., et al. Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography. Health Psychol. 16 5 (1997) 433-441
27. Rakowski W., Breen N., Meissner H., et al. Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Prev. Med. 39 1 (2004) 1-10
28. Ries L.A.G., Eisner M.P., Kosary C.L., et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2001 (2004), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD
29. Rimer B.K., Halabi S., Sugg Skinner C., et al. Effects of a mammography decision-making intervention at 12 and 24 months. Am. J. Prev. Med. 22 4 (2002) 247-257
30. Saunders K.W., Davis R.L., and Stergachis A. Group Health Cooperative. In: Strom B. (Ed). Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th edition (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 223-239
31. Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., Venet L., and Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 69 2 (1982) 349-355
32. Smith R.A., Cokkinides V., and Eyre H.J. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J. Clin. 55 (2005) 31-44
33. Song L., and Fletcher R. Breast cancer rescreening in low-income women. Am. J. Prev. Med. 15 2 (1998) 128-133
34. Tabar L., Fagerberg C.J.G., Gad A., et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet 1 (1985) 829-832
35. Tabar L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S.W., and Day N.E. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 43 2 (1989) 107-114
36. Taplin S.H., Thompson R.S., Schnitzer F., Anderman C., and Immanuel V. Revisions in the risk-based breast cancer screening program at Group Health Cooperative. Cancer 66 (1990) 812-818
37. Taplin S.H., Barlow W.E., Ludman E., et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: randomized study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92 3 (2000) 233-242
38. Taplin S.H., Ichikawa L., Buist D.S., Seger D., and White E. Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease?. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 13 (2004) 225-234
39. Tatla R.K., Paszat L.F., Bondy S.J., Chen Z., Chiarelli A.M., and Mai V. Socioeconomic status and returning for a second screen in the Ontario breast screening program. Breast 12 4 (2003) 237-246
40. Taylor V.M., Taplin S.H., Urban N., White E., and Peacock S. Repeat mammography use among women ages 50-75. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 4 4 (1995) 409-413
41. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. 2nd ed. (1996), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore xxvi
42. Ulcickas Yood M., McCarthy B.D., Lee N.C., Jacobsen G., and Johnson C.C. Patterns and characteristics of repeat mammography among women 50 years and older. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8 7 (1999) 595-599
43. Von Eschenbach A.C. NCI remains committed to current mammography guidelines. Oncologist 7 (2002) 170-171