FROC curves using a model of visual search

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 6515, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Chakraborty, D P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CAD evaluation; Figures of merit; Froc curves; Search model; Software; Visual search

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

FIGURES OF MERIT; FROC CURVES; SEARCH-MODELS; VISUAL SEARCH;

PATTERN RECOGNITION;

EID: 35148881681     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.699222     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Egan JP, Greenburg GZ, Schulman AI. Operating characteristics, signal detectability and the method of free response. J Acoust Soc. Am. 1961; 33:993-1007.
2. Bunch PC, Hamilton JF, Sanderson GK, Simmons AH. A Free-Response Approach to the Measurement and Characterization of Radiographic-Observer Performance. J of Appl Photogr. Eng. 1978; 4:166-171.
3. Metz CE. Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis: A Tool for the Quantitative Evaluation of Observer Performance and Imaging Systems. J Am Coll Radiol 2006; 3:413-422.
4. Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: Modeling, analysis and validation. Medical Physics 2004; 31:2313-2330.
5. Edwards DC, Kupinski MA, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model. Med Phys 2002; 29:2861-2870.
6. Chakraborty DP. ROC Curves predicted by a model of visual search. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006; 51:3463-3482.
7. Chakraborty DP. A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006; 51:3449-3462.
8. Dorfman DD, AIf E. Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals - rating method data. J. Math. Psychol. 1969; 6:487-496.
9. Pan X, Metz CE. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data. Academic Radiology 1997; 4:380-389.
10. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS. A contaminated binormal model for ROC data: Part II. A formal model. Acad Radiol. 2000; 7:427-437.
11. Chakaborty DP, Yoon HJ. A maximum likelihood method for estimating the parameters of a search model. In:2006 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. Arlington, VA, 2006; 1304-1307.
12. Stuart A, Ord K, Arnold S. Kendall's Advance Theory of Statistics: Classical Inference and the Linear Model, Vol 2A. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
13. Samuelson FW, Petrick N. Comparing image detection algorithms using resampling. In:2006 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Micro. Arlington, VA, 2006; 1312-1315.
14. Kundel HL, Nodine CF. A visual concept shapes image perception. Radiology 1983; 146:363-368.
15. Kundel HL, Nodine CF. Modeling visual search during mammogram viewing. Proc. SPIE 2004; 5372:110-115.
16. Nodine CF, Kundel HL. Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. RadioGraphics 1987;7:1241-1250.
17. Metz CE. ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging. Investigative Radiology 1986; 21.720-733.
18. Metz CE, Starr SJ, L.B. L. Observer performance in detecting multiple radiographic signals. Radiology 1976; 121:337-347.
19. Metz CE. Some Practical Issues of Experimental Design and Data Analysis in Radiological ROC studies. Investigative Radiology 1989; 24:234-245.