Recipient counseling for donor insemination

Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians

Volumn 9780521853637, Issue , 2006, Pages 305-318

  Thorn, Petra ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148878817     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511547263.019     Document Type: Chapter

References (126)

1. Semke I. Kiinstliche Befruchtung in wissenschafts- und sozialgeschichtlicher Sicht. Frankfurt: Lang, 1996.
2. Gregoire A T, Mayer R C. The impregnators. Fertil Steril 1965; 16:130-4.
3. Zoldbrod AP, Covington S N. Recipient counseling for donor insemination. LH Burns, SN Covington, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive a Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group, 1999; 325-344.
4. Orenstein P. Looking for a donor to call dad. New York Times Magazine June 18, 1995; 28-51.
5. Snowdon R, Mitchell G D, Snowdon E M. Artefizielle Reproduktion. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1985.
6. Blyth E. The UK: Evolution of a statutory regulatory approach. E Blyth, R Landau, eds. Third Party Assisted Conception Across Cultures. Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher, 2004; 226-245.
7. Schilling G. Kinder nach donogener (heterologer) Insemination in der Einschatzung ihrer Eltern. Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische. Medizin und Psychotherapie, 1999; 45:354-371.
8. Thorn P, Daniels K. Die medizinische Praxis der dono- genen Insemination in Deutschland. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2000; 60:630-637.
9. Lee S. Counselling in Male Infertility. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1996.
10. Brahler E, Goldschmidt S, Kupfer J, et al. eds. Mann und Medizin. Jahrbuch der Medizinischen Psychologic 19. Gottingen: Hogrefe, 2001; 11-33.
11. Daniels K, Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences 1993; 12:155-170.
12. Snowdon R, Snowdon E. The gift of a child. A Guide to Donor Insemination. Exeter: Allen & Unwin, 1993.
13. Krause W. Vorwort zur deutschen Auflage. Snowdon R, Mitchell G D, Snowdon E M. Artefizielle Reproduktion. Stuttgart: Enke Verlag, 1985.
14. Lag om Insemination (1985). Swedish Insemination Act, No. 1140/1984.
15. Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz - 275. Bundesgesetz, mit dem Regelungen uber die medizinisch unterstutzte Fortpflanzung getroffen werden, 1992.
16. Szoke H. Australia: Choice and diversity in regulation and record keeping. In: E Blyth, R Landau, eds. Third- party assisted conception across cultures. Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives, 2004; 36-54.
17. Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz. Uber die medizinisch unterstdtzte Fortpflanzung - Fortpflanzungsmedizingesetz vom 18. Dezember 1998.
18. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Disclosure of Donor Information Regulations), 2004.
19. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Ethics Committee Report: Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:527-531.
20. Human Assisted Reproduction Technology Act, 21 November 2004.
21. Donor Conception Support Group, Australia (http://members.optushome.com.au/dcsg).
22. Donor Conception Network, United Kingdom (http://www.dcnetwork.org).
23. Infertility Network, Canada (http://www.infertility- network.org).
24. Information Donogene Insemination, Germany (http://www.spendersamenkinder.de).
25. Blyth E, Landau R, eds. Third-party assisted conception across cultures. Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives, London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher, 2004.
26. Boggio A. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. Advanced Access publishing, March 24, 2005.
27. Daniels K. Adoption and donor insemination: Factors affecting couples' choices. Child Welfare. 1994; 73:1473-1480.
28. Czybo J C, Chevret M. Psychological reactions of couples to artificial insemination with donor sperm. International Journal of Fertility. 1979; 24:240-245.
29. Baran A, Pannor R. The Psychology of Donor Insemination. New York: Amistad, 2nd edition, 1993.
30. Wendland C L, Byrn F, Hill C. Donor insemination: A comparison of lesbian couples, heterosexual couples, and single women. Fertil Steril 1996; 65:764-770.
31. Brahler C. Familie, Kinderwunsch, Unfruchtbarkeit. Motivation und ehandlungsverlaufe bei kunstlicher Befruchtung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990.
32. Mahlstedt P, Greenfeld D. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: The need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril 1989; 52:908-914.
33. Goebel P, Lubke F. Katamnestische Untersuchung an 96 Paaren mit heterologer Insemination. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1987; 4:636-640.
34. Berger M D. Couples' reactions to male infertility and donor insemination. Am J Psychiatry 1980; 137:1047-1049.
35. Klock S, Maier D. Psychological factors related to donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1991; 56:489-495.
36. Schaible A. Zeugungsunfahigkeit und Kinderwunsch. Akzeptanz und psychische Belastung nach erfolgreicher artifizieller donogener Insemination. Frankfurt: VAS, 1992.
37. Amuzu B, Laxoca R, Shapiro S S. Pregnancy outcome, health of children and family adjustment after donor insemination. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75:899-905.
38. Schover L R, Collins R L, Richards S. Psychological aspects of donor insemination: Evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples. Fertil Steril 1992; 57:583-590.
39. Brewaeys A. Review: Donor insemination, the impact on child and family development. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1996; 17:1-17.
40. Gillet W R, Daniels K, Herbison G. Feelings of couples who have had a child by donor insemination: The degree of congruence. J Psychsom Obstet Gynecol 1996; 17:135-142.
41. Hermann H, Wild T, Schumacher T, Unterberg H. Psy- chosoziale Situation von Ehepaaren vor der artifiziellen Insemination mit Donorsamen. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 1984; 44:719-723.
42. Bendvold E, Skjaeraasen J, Moe N, et al. Marital break-up among couples raising families by artificial insemination by donor. Fertil Steril 1989; 51:980-983.
43. Milson I, Bergman P. A study of parental attitudes after donor insemination (AID). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61:125-8.
44. Clayton C E, Kovacs C T. AID offspring: Initial follow-up of 50 couples. MedJ Aust 1982; 1:338-339.
45. Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Giavazzi M T, Guerra D, Mac- Callum F, Rust J. The European study of assisted reproduction families: The transition into adolescence. Hum Reprod 2002; 17(3):830-840.
46. Brewaeys A. Review: Parent-child relationships and child development in donor insemination families. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7:38-46.
47. Golombok S, Jadva V, Lycett E, et al. Families created by gamete donation: Follow-up at age 2. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:286-293.
48. Brewaeys A, Ponjaert I, Van Hall E V, et al. Donor insemination: Child development and family functioning in lesbian mother families. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:1349-1359.
49. Brewaeys A, Dufour S, Kentenich H. Sind Bedenken hin- sichtlich der Kinderwunschbehandlung lesbischer und alleinstehender Frauen berechtigt? Reproduktionsmedi- zin und Endokrinologie 2005; 1:35-40.
50. Murray C and Golombok S. Going it alone: Solo mothers and their infants conceived by donor insemination. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2005; 75:242-253.
51. Murray C, Golombok S. Solo mothers and their donor insemination infants: Follow-up at age 2 years. Human Reproduction Advance Access Publishing, February 25, 2005.
52. Miall C. The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Problems 1986; 4:268-282.
53. Nachtigall R D. Secrecy: An unresolved issue in the practice of donor insemination. Am J Obstet and Gyn 1993; 168:1846-1851.
54. Schilling G. Zur Problematik familiarer Geheimnisse am Beispiel der heterologen Insemination. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie 1995;45:16-23.
55. Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A, et al. Disclosure of donor insemination: Parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1995; 65:549-59.
56. Nachtigall R, Becker G, Szkupinski Quigora S, et al. The disclosure decision: Concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:1165-1170.
57. Lindblad F, Gottlieb C, Lalos O. To tell or not to tell - what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2000; 21:193-203.
58. Klock S. To tell or not to tell. The issue of privacy and dis- closure.In S Leiblum, ed. Infertility. Psychological Issues and Counselling Strategies. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1997; 167-188.
59. van Berkel R, van der Veen L, Kimmel I, et al. Differences in the attitudes of couples whose children were conceived through artificial insemination by donor in 1980 and in 1996. Fertil Steril 1999; 71:226-231.
60. Rumball A, Adair A. Telling the story: Parents' scripts for donor offspring. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1392-1399.
61. Gottlieb C, Lalos O, Lindblad R. Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: The impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2052-2056.
62. Daniels K, Thorn P, Westerbrooke R. Confidence in the use of donor insemination: An evaluation of the impact of participating in a group preparation programme. Submitted Hum Fertil, May 2006.
63. Golombok S, Lycett E, MacCallum F, et al. Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation. J Fam Psychol 2004; 18:443-452.
64. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, et al. School-aged children of donor insemination: A study of parents' disclosure patterns. Hum Reprod advances access publishing 2005; 20(3):810-819.
65. Turner A, Coyle A. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2041-2051.
66. Cordray B. An open letter to the HFEA. In: DC Network Journal Winter 1999/2000:3-5.
67. Lycett E, Daniels K, Curson R, et al. Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: A study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:172-9.
68. Vanfraussen K, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Brewaeys A. An attempt to reconstruct children's donor concept: A comparison between children's and lesbian parents' attitudes towards donor anonymity. Hum Reprod 2000; 16:2019-2025.
69. Scheib J E, Riordan M, Rubin S. Adolescents with open- identity sperm donors: Reports from 12-17 year olds. Hum Reprod 2004; 20:239-252.
70. Bertalanffy L. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Application. New York: George Braziller, 1968.
71. Imber-Black E, ed. Secrets in Families and Family Therapy. New York: WW Norton, 1993.
72. Karpel M A. Family secrets: Conceptual and ethical issues in the relational context, ethical and practical considerations in therapeutic management. Family Process 1980; 19:295-306.
73. Papp P. Der Wurm in der Knospe; Geheimnisse zwis- chen Eltern und Kindern. Imber Black, ed. Geheimnisse und Tabus in Familie und Familientherapie. Freiburg: Lambertus Verlag, 1995; 85-108.
74. Schaffer J, Diamond R. Infertility: Private pain and secret stigma. In: E Imber-Black, ed. Secrets in Families and Family Therapy. WW New York: Norton 1993; 106-20.
75. Bradshaw J. Familiengeheimnisse. Warum es sich lohnt, ihnen auf die Spur zu kommen. Munchen: Kosel, 1995.
76. Wiemann I. Wie viel Wahrheit braucht mein Kind? Von kleinen Lugen, grofien Lasten und dem Mut zur Aufrichtigkeit in der Familie. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 2001.
77. Engels G L. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196:129-136.
78. Brandon J, Warner J. A.I.D. and adoption: Some comparisons. BriJ Soc Work 1977; 7:335-341.
79. Daniels D. Die biopsychosoziale Perspektive. Orgyn 2000; 3:11-14.
80. Blyth E. Infertility and assisted conception. Practice Issues for Counsellors. Birmingham: British Association for Social Workers, 1995.
81. Thorn P. Familienbildung mit Spendersamen. Eine sys- temische Innen- und Aufienbeobachtung. In: Kontext. Zeitschrift fur systemische Therapie und Familientherapie, 2001; 4:305-318.
82. Erikson E H. Lebensgeschichte und historischer Augen- blick. 1. Frankfurt, Auflage, 1977.
83. Krappmann L. Soziologische Dimensionen der Identitat, Auflage, Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, 1973.
84. Gergen K. The Saturated Self. New York: Basic Books, 1991.
85. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity, 1992.
86. Triseliotis J. Donor insemination and the child. Politics and the Life Sciences 1973; 12:195-197.
87. McWhinnie A M. Disclosure and development: “Taking the baby home was just the beginning.” In: M Singer, M Hunter, eds. Assisted Human Reproduction. Psychological and Ethical Dilemmas. London: W. Hurr, 2003:129-153.
88. Feast J. Donor-assisted conception: What can we learn from adoption? In: M Singer, M Hunter, eds. Assisted Human Reproduction. Psychological and Ethical Dilemmas. London: W. Hurr, 2003; 76-98.
89. Haimes E, Timms N. Adoption, Identity and Social Policy. London: Grower, 1985.
90. Brodzinsky D M. New perspectives on adoption revelation. Adoption and Fostering 1984; 29:27-32.
91. Triseliotis J. Identity formation and the adopted person revisited: The dynamics of adoption social and personal perspectives. In: A Treacher, I Katz, eds. The Dynamics of Adoption. Social and Personal Perspectives. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher, 2000; 81-98.
92. Goffman E. Stigma. Uber Techniken der Bewaltigung beschadigter Identitaten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 13. Auflage, 1998.
93. Kurzban R, Leary M R. Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin 2001; 127:187-208.
94. Neuberg S L, Smith S M, Asher T. Why people stigmatize: Toward a biocultural framework. In: R Heatherton, R Kleck, M Hebl, F Hull, eds. The Social Psychology of Stigma. New York: Guilford Press, 2000; 31-61.
95. Stangor C, Grandall C S. Threat and the social construction of stigma. In: R Heatherton, R Kleck, M Hebl, F Hull, eds. The Social Psychology ofStigma. New York: Guilford Press, 2000; 62-87.
96. Pfuhl E H, Henry S. The Deviance Process, 3rd ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993.
97. Lampman C, Cowling-Guyer S. Attitudes toward voluntary and involuntary childlessness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1985; 17:213-222.
98. Valentine P. Psychological impact of infertility: Identifying issues and needs. Social Work and Health Care 1986; 11:61-69.
99. Mason M C. Male Infertility - Men Talking. London, Routledge: 1993.
100. Houghton D, Houghton P. Coping with Childlessness. London, Unwin Hyman:1987.
101. Lee S. Male mysteries: Factors in male infertility. In: SE Jennings, ed. Infertility Counselling. London: Blackwell Science, 1995; 67-78.
102. Schneider D M. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
103. Finkler K. The kin in the gene. The medicalisation of family and kinship in American society. Current Anthropology 2001; 42:235-263.
104. Strathern M. Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge, 1992.
105. Franklin S. Making representations: The Parliamentary Debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act. In: J Edwards, S Franklin, E Hirsch, F Price, M Strathern, eds. Technologies of Procreation. Kinship in The Age of Assisted Conception. New York: Routledge, 1993; 127-165.
106. Burns L H, Covington S N, eds. Infertility Counselling. A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Parthenon, 1999.
107. Boivin J, Kentenich H. ESHRE Monographs: Guidelines for Counselling in Infertility. Oxford University Press, 2002.
108. Blood J. Mandatory counselling. J Fertil Coun 2004; 11:31-35.
109. Thorn P, Daniels K. A group-work approach in family building by donor insemination: Empowering the marginalized. Hum Fertil 2003; 6:46-50.
110. Bill C-6. An Act respecting assisted human reproduction and related research, 2004.
111. Daniels K. New Zealand: From secrecy and shame to openness and acceptance. In: E Blyth, R Landau, eds. Third-party assisted conception across cultures. Social, Legal and Ethical Perspectives. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher, 2004:148-167.
112. Boivin J, Scanlan L C, Walker S M. Why are infertility patients not using psychosocial counselling? Hum Reprod 1999; 15:1384-1391.
113. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertil Steril 2004; 81(3): 527-531.
114. Kentenich H. The role of the physician in counselling. ESHRE Monographs: Guidelines for Counselling in Infertility. Oxford University Press, 2002:11-13.
115. Daniels K. Donor insemination. ESHRE Monographs: Guidelines for Counselling in Infertility. Oxford University Press, 2002: 31-32.
116. Kerr J, Brown C, Balen A. The experiences of couples in the United Kingdom who have had infertility treatment - the results of a survey performed in 1997. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:934-938.
117. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (c 37).
118. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Child rearing ability and the provision of fertility services. Ethics Committee Report. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:564-567.
119. Richtlinien der Bundesarztekammer: Durchfuhrung der assistierten Reproduktion. Deutsches Arzteblatt 95, Heft 49 (4.12.1998), A-3166.
120. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Child rearing ability and the provisions for fertility services. Ethics Committee Report. Fertil Steril 82:564-567.
121. Nikolettos N, Asimakopoulos B, Hatzissabas I. Intrafa- milial sperm donation: Ethical questions and concerns. Hum Reprod 2003; 15:933-936.
122. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Family members as gamete donors and surrogates. Ethics Committee Report. Fertil Steril 2003; 80:1124-1130.
123. Baetens P. Oocyte donation. ESHRE Monographs: Guidelines for Counselling in Infertility. Oxford University Press, 2002; 33-34.
124. Kentenich H. Patients in migration. ESHRE Monographs: Guidelines for Counselling in Infertility. Oxford University Press, 2002; 29-30.
125. Newson A.J, Smajdor A C. Artificial gametes: New paths to parenthood? J Med Ethics 2005; 31:184-186.
126. Daniels K, Meadows L. Sharing information with adults conceived as a result of donor insemination. Hum Fertil. 2006, in press.