Concurrent validity of cannabis misuse diagnoses on CIDI-Auto 2.1 in low-level cannabis users from the general population

Australian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 169-175

  Kedzior, Karina K ^a,b   Martin Iverson, Mathew T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cannabis misuse; CIDI Auto 2.1; Concurrent validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148864147     PISSN: 00049530     EISSN: 17429536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049530701519729     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2. Andrews, G., & Peters, L. (1998). The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 80-88.
3. Andrews, G., & Peters, L. (2003). The CIDI-Auto: A computerised diagnostic interview for psychiatry. Accessed 15 April 2005, at http://www.crufad.com/cidi/discuss.htm
4. Andrews, G., Peters, L., Guzman, A., & Bird, K. (1995). A comparison of two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 29, 124-132.
5. Bagley, S., White, H., & Golomb, B. (2001). Logistic regression in the medical literature: standards for use and reporting, with particular attention to one medical domain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 979-985.
6. Darke, S., Ross, J., & Hall, W. (1996). Overdose among heroin users in Sydney, Australia: I. Prevalence and correlates of non-fatal overdose. Addiction, 91, 405-411.
7. Didcott, P., Reilly, D., Swift, W., & Hall, W. (1997). Long-term cannabis users on the New South Wales north coast. Monograph 30. Australia: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre.
8. Drake, R., Rosenberg, S., & Mueser, K. (1996). Assessing substance use disorder in persons with severe mental illness. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 70, 3-17.
9. Feingold, A., & Rounsaville, B. (1995). Construct validity of the abuse-dependence distinction as measured by DSM-IV criteria for different psychoactive substances. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 39, 99-109.
10. Ferri, C., Marsden, J., de Araujo, M., Laranjeira, R., & Gossop, M. (2000). Validity and reliability of the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in a Brazilian sample of drug users. Drug and Alcohol Review, 19, 451-455.
11. Gossop, M., Best, D., Marsden, J., & Strang, J. (1997). Testretest reliability of the Severity of Dependence Scale (comment). Addiction, 92, 353.
12. Gossop, M., Darke, S., Griffiths, P., Hando, J., Powis, B., Hall, W., et al. (1995). The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction, 90, 607-614.
13. Hall, W., Solowij, N., & Lemon, J. (1994). The health and psychological consequences of cannabis use. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
14. Kedzior, K., Badcock, J., & Martin-Iverson, M. (2006). Validity and consistency of self-reports regarding substance use in general research volunteers, including regular cannabis users and schizophrenia patients. Substance Use and Misuse, 41, 743750.
15. Kedzior, K., & Martin-Iverson, M. (2006). Chronic cannabis use is associated with attention-modulated reduction in prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in healthy humans. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 20, 471-484.
16. Kiess, H. (1989). Statistical concepts for the behavioral sciences. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
17. Makkai, T., & McAllister, I. (1997). Marijuana in Australia: patterns and attitudes. National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 31. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service.
18. Martin, G., Copeland, J., Gates, P., & Gilmour, S. (2006). The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in an adolescent population of cannabis users: Reliability, validity and diagnostic cut-off. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 83, 90-93.
19. Peters, L., & Andrews, G. (1995). Procedural validity of the computerized version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychological Medicine, 25, 1269-1280.
20. Rosenman, S., Levings, C., & Körten, A. (1997). Clinical utility and patient acceptance of the computerized Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Psychiatric Services, 48, 815-820.
21. Rubio-Stipec, M., Peters, L., & Andrews, G. (1999). Test-retest reliability of the computerized CIDI (CIDI-Auto): Substance abuse modules. Substance Abuse, 20, 263-272.
22. Swift, W., Copeland, J., & Hall, W. (1998). Choosing a diagnostic cut-off for cannabis dependence. Addiction, 93, 1681-1692.
23. Swift, W., Hall, W., Didcott, P., & Reilly, D. (1998). Patterns and correlates of cannabis dependence among long-term users in an Australian rural area. Addiction, 93, 1149-1160.
24. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
25. Teesson, M., Lynskey, M., Manor, B., & Baillie, A. (2002). The structure of cannabis dependence in the community. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 255-262.
26. Uestuen, B., Compton, W., Mager, D., Babor, T., Baiyewu, O., Chatterji, S., et al. (1997). WHO study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: Overview of methods and results. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 161-169.
27. Wittchen, H-U. (1994). Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): A critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 28, 57-84.