Kernel sharing with joint boosting for multi-class concept detection

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Jiang, Wei ^a   Chang, Shih Fu ^a   Loui, Alexander C ^b  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute

^b EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

KERNEL SHARING; MEAN AVERAGE PRECISION (MAP); SPATIAL MATCHING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 35148857184     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383483     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A. Amir, et al. IBM research TRECVID-2004 video retrieval system. Proc. NIST TRECVID Workshop, 2004. 1, 5
2. T.G. Dietterich. An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, randomization. Machine Learning, 40(2), 1999. 6
3. R. Fergus, et al. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. Proc.CVPR, 264-271, 2003. 1, 2, 3
4. J. Friedman and et al. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting, 1998. Dept. Statistics, Stanford University Technical Report. 2, 3, 4, 5
5. K. Grauman and T. Darrel. The pyramid match kernel: discriminative classification with sets of image features. Proc. ICCV, 2:1458-1465, 2005. 1, 3
6. K. Grauman and T. Darrel. Approximate correspondences in high dimensions. Advances in NIPS, 2006. 1, 2, 3
7. A. Holub and P. Perona. A discriminative framework for modeling object class. Proc. CVPR, 1:664-671, 2005. 1
8. W. Jiang and et al. Similarity-based online feature selection in content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, (3):702-712, 2006. 1, 2
9. S. Lazebnik and et al. Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natual scene categories. Proc. CVPR, 2:2169-2178, 2006. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
10. LSCOM. DTO LSCOM Lexicon Definitions and Annotations. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/dvmm/lscom/ 5
11. E. Nowak and et al. Sampling strategies for bag-of-features image classification. Proc ECCV, 2006. 1
12. A. Oliva, et al. Modeling the shape of the scene:a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. IJCV, 43(2), 2001. 2
13. A. Opelt and et al. Generic object recognition with boosting. IEEE Trans, on PAMI, 28(3):416-431, 2006. 1, 3
14. A. Opelt and et al. Incremental learning of object detectors using a visual shape alphabet. Proc. CVPR, 1:3 10,2006. 4, 6
15. R. Schapire and Y. Singer. Improved boosting algorithm using confidence-rated predictions. Proc. Annual Conf. on Computational Learning Theory, pages 80-9.1, 1998. 4
16. K. Tieu and P. Viola. Boosting image retrieval. Proc. CVPR, pp.228-235, 2000. 4
17. A. Torralba and et al Sharing features: effective boosting procedure for multiclass object detecion. Proc CVPR, 2:762-769, 2004. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
18. TRECVID. Tree video retrieval, evaluations, 2005. in http://wwwn.lpir. nist.gov/projects/trecvid/. 2, 5, 6
19. C. Wallraven and et al. Recognition with local features: the kernel, recipe. Proc ICCV, 1:257-264, 2003. 1, 2
20. D. Zhang, et al., A generative-discriminative hybrid method for multi-view object detection. Proc CVPR, vol.2, 2006. 1.
21. J. Zhang and et al. Local features and kernels for classification of texture and object categories: an in-depth study, 2005. Technical Report RR-5737, INRIA Phône-Alpes. 1, 2