Recipient counseling for oocyte donation

Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 319-338

  Sachs, Patricia L ^a   Burns, Linda Hammer ^b  

^a Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148852807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511547263.020     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, et al. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: The decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 476-484.
2. Ahuja K K, Simons E G, Fiamanya W, et al. Egg-sharing in assisted conception: Ethical and practical considerations. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:1126-1131.
3. Haase J, Takefman J. Global Perspectives in Infertility Counselling. International Infertility Counseling Organization. Postgraduate Course. Montreal, Canada 2004.
4. Kenentich H. Patients in migration. In: J Boivin, H Kentenich, eds, Guidelines for Counseling in Infertility. ESHRE Monographs. London: Oxford University Press, 2002.
5. Berriot-Salvadore E. The discourse of medicine and science. In: NZ Davis, A Farge, eds, A History of Women: Renaissance and Enlightenment Paradoxes. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press, 1993.
6. Lutjen P, Trouson A, Leeton J, et al. The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature 1984; 307:174-175.
7. Directive 2004/23 E. C. of the European Parliament and the Council (2004) O. J. L102/48 (March 31, 2004).
8. Human Fertilisation and Embryology: The regulation of Donor-Assisted Conception. 9/2004 www.hfea.gov.uk.
9. Cox L W. The role of accreditation committees in oocyte donation. Reprod Fertil Develop 1992; 4:731-7.
10. Letur-Konirsch H. Oocyte donation in France and national balance sheet (GEDO). Different European approaches. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2004; 32:108-115.
11. Anderson N, Gianaroli L, Felbergaum R, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1158-1176.
12. Giva-Osagie O F. ART in developing countries with reference to sub-Sahara Africa. In: E Vayne, PS Rowe, PD Griffin, eds. Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction. Geneva: World Health Organization Report, 2001; 23-30.
13. Boggio A. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1153-1157.
14. Soderstrom-Antilla V, Hovatta O. Oocyte donation to be legalized in Sweden. Excellent results reported from other countries. Lakartidningen 2002; 99:3118-3121.
15. Baetens P. Oocyte donation. In: J Boivin, H Kentenich, eds, Guidelines on Infertility Counselling. ESHRE Monographs. London: Oxford University Press, 2002; 33-34.
16. ESHRE task force on ethics and law. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:407-408.
17. Hersherberg P. Recipients of oocyte donation: An integrative review. JOGNN 2004; 33:610-621.
18. Applegarth L, Goldberg NC, Cholst I, et al. Families created through ovum donation: A preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment. J Assist Reprod Genetics 1995; 12:574-580.
19. Sewall G, Mason L. Parental acceptance, disclosure, and decision-making amongst recipients in an anonymous donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:S252.
20. Greenfeld D A, Klock S C. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1565-1571.
21. Lindheim S R, Kavi S, Sauer M. Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: A comparison between gamete donors and their recipients. J Assist Reprod Genetics 2000; 17:127-130.
22. Soderstrom-Anttila V, Sajaniemi N, Tiitinen A, et al. Health and development of children born after oocyte donation compared with that of those born after in-vitro fertilization, and parents' attitudes regarding secrecy. Humn Reprod 1998; 13:2009-2015.
23. Heineman-Kuschinksy E, Davis S, Bochard E, et al. Assessment of recipient patient's concerns and feelings associated with anonymous oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:S251.
24. Greenfeld D A, Greenfeld D G, Mazure C M, et al. Do attitudes toward disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation? Fertil Steril 1998; 79:1009-1014.
25. Fielding D, Handley S, Duqueno L, et al. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: A follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment. J Comm Applied Soc Psych 1998; 8:273-277.
26. Josephs L S, Grill E, Crone K, et al. Sister ovum donation: Psychological outcomes. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:S102.
27. Greenfeld D A, Greenfeld D G, Mazure C M, et al. Social and psychological characteristics of donor oocyte recipients. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:S51.
28. Burgos C, et al. Attitudes of patients who underwent oocyte donation: A multicentre study of the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction. Presented at the 14th Annual meeting of the European Society of Reproduction and Embryology. Goteborg, Sweden, June 21-24, 1998.
29. Zegers-Hochschild F, Pacheco I M, Fabres C, et al. Psychosocial characteristics of Chilean women participating in an in vitro fertilization program (IVF/ET) with donated oocytes (OD). Fertil Steril 1998; 70:S29.
30. Epstein Y M, Rosenberg H S. Depression in primary versus secondary infertility egg recipients. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:1882-1884.
31. Bartlett J A. Psychiatric issues in non-anonymous oocyte donation. Psychosomatics 1991; 32:433-437.
32. Golombok S, Murray C, Brinsden P, et al. Social versus biological parenting: Family functioning and the socio- emotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. J Child Psychol Psychia 1999; 40:519-527.
33. Ireland M S. Reconceiving Women: Separating Motherhood from Female Identity. New York: Guilford Press, 1993.
34. Horney K. Feminine Psychology. New York: Norton, 1967/1973.
35. Chodorow N J. The Reproduction of Mothering, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
36. Chodorow N J. “Too late”: Ambivalence about motherhood, choice and time. J Amer Psychoanal Assn 2003; 51:1181-1198.
37. Miller J B. Women's psychological development: Connections, disconnections, and violations. In: MM Berger, ed. Women Beyond Freud: New Concepts of Feminine Psychology. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1994; 79-98.
38. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1963.
39. Kurzban R, Leary M R. Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin 2001; 127:187-208.
40. Neuberg S L, Smith S M, Asher T. Why people stigmatize: Toward a biocultural framework. In: R Heatheton, R Kleck, M Hebl, F Hull, eds. The Social Psychology of Stigma. New York: Guilford Press, 2000: 31-61.
41. Bowlby, J. Maternal Care and Mental Health. World Health Organization Monograph (Serial No.2), 1951.
42. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Vol 1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
43. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Vol 2 Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
44. Cowan P A, Cowan C P. Strengthening couples to improve children's well-being. Poverty Res News 2002; 3:18-20.
45. Minuchin S. Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974; 54.
46. Burns L H. Infertility as boundary ambiguity: One theoretical perspective. Fam Process 1987; 26:359-372.
47. Boss P. Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
48. Imber-Black E. Secrets in Families and Family Therapy. New York: WW Norton, 1993.
49. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines for oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2002; 77:S6-S7.
50. Lee F R. Driven by Costs, Fertility Clients Head Overseas. New York Times. 1-25-2005.
51. Pennings G. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:2689-2694.
52. Applegarth L D, Kingsberg S A. The donor as patient: Assessment and support. In: LH Burns, SN Covington, eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians. New York: Parthenon Publishing, 1999; 369.
53. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Ethics Committee Report. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete donation. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:3.
54. Rohr R. Companies offer women $7,000 for donating eggs. Washington Square News 1-28-2003.
55. Kolata G. Young women offer to sell their eggs to infertile couples. New York Times 11-10-1991.
56. Kolata G. Price of donor eggs soars, setting off a debate on ethics. New York Times 2-25-1998.
57. Hoffman J. Egg donations meet a need and raise ethical questions. New York Times 1-8-1996.
58. Pennings G. The right to choose your own donor: A step towards commercialization or a step toward empowering the patient? Hum Reprod 2000; 15:508-514.
59. German E K, Mukerjee T, Osborne D, Cooperman A B. Does increasing ovum donor compensation lead to differences in donor characteristics? Fertil Steril 2001; 78:75-79.
60. Anderson J, Alesi R., Donor issues. In: Infertility Counsellor's Seminar, 12 January 1998. Melbourne, Australia.
61. Josephs L S, Grill E, Crone K, et al. Sister ovum donation: Psychological outcomes. Fertil Steril 2004; 82:S102.
62. Kump L, Licciardi F, Krey L, et al. An oocyte donor's willingness to donate - does the recipient's lifestyle make a difference? Fertil Steril 2003; 80:S140.
63. Porreco R P, Harden L, Gambotto M, Shapiro H. Expectation of pregnancy outcome among mature women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:38-41.
64. Callaway L K, Lust K, McIntyre H D. Pregnancy outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60:562-563.
65. Chibber R. Child-bearing beyond age 50: Pregnancy outcome in 59 cases “a concern”? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271(3):189-194. Epub 2004.
66. Paulson R J, Boostanfar R, Saadat P, et al. Pregnancy in the sixth decade of life: Obstetric outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA 2002; 288: 2320-2323.
67. Tarlatzis B C, Pados G. Oocyte donation: Clinical and practical aspects. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 161:99-102.
68. Gurmankin A D, Caplan A L, Braverman A M. Screening practices and beliefs of assisted reproductive technology programs. Fertil Steril 2005; 83:61-67.
69. Mahlstedt P P, Greenfeld D A. Assisted reproductive technology for donor gametes: The need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril 1989; 52:908-914.
70. Klock S C, Jacob M C, Maier D. A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: Secrecy, privacy, and disclosure. Fertil Steril 1994; 62(3):477-484.
71. Nachtigall R D, Pitcher L, Tachann J M, et al. Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertil Steril 1997; 68:83-89.
72. Heineman E. Trends of recipient patients concerns and feelings associated with anonymous oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:S24.
73. Thorn P, Daniels K R. A group work approach to family-building by donor insemination: Empowering the marginalised. Hum Fertil 2003; 6:46-50.
74. Chen S U, Lien Y R, Chen H F, et al. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1975-1980.
75. Li X H, Chen S U, Zhang X, et al. Cryopreserved oocytes of infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology could be an important source of oocyte donation: A clinical report of successful pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:3390-3394.
76. Silber S J, Lenahan K M, Levine D J, et al. Ovarian transplantation between monozygotic twins discordant for premature ovarian failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:58-63.
77. Siegel-Itzkovich J. Woman gives birth after receiving transplant of her own ovarian tissue. BMJ 2005; 9:70.