Reproducibility and validity of the Dutch life habits questionnaire (LIFE-H 3.0) in older adults

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 853-862

  Lemmens, Jessie ^a   van Engelen, Eveline I S M ^a   Post, Marcel W M ^b   Beurskens, A J H M ^c   Wolters, Pieter M J C ^c   de Witte, Luc P ^a  

^a ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b Rehabilitation Centre 'De Hoogstraat'   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Physical Therapy   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE;

EID: 35148827554     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507077599     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fougeyrollas P NL, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion S-A, St-Michel G. Social Consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: Conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 1998; 21: 127-41.
2. Cardol M, Haan de RJ, Van den Bos, GAM, De Jong BA, De Groot, IJM. The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 411-19.
3. Noreau L, Desrosiers J, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Measuring social Participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 346-52.
4. World Health Organization. The International Classification of Function. WHO, 2001.
5. Grimby G. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 975-76.
6. Lepage C, Noreau L, Bernard P-M, Fougeyrollas P. Profile of handicap situations in children with cerebral palsy. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998; 30: 263-72.
7. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II Prognosis. Scot Med J 1957; 2: 200-15.
8. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 519-26.
9. Harwood RH, Roger A, Dickinson E, Ebrahim S. Measuring handicap: the London Handicap Scale, a new measure for chronic disease. Qual Health Care 1994; 3: 11-16.
10. Steward G, Kidd D, Thompson AJ. The assessment of handicap: an evaluation of the Environmental Status Scale. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 312-16.
11. Lepage C, Noreau L, Bernard P-M. Association between characteristics of locomotion and accomplishments of Life Habits in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 458-66.
12. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, St-Michel G. Life Habits measure - Shortened version (LIFE-H 3.0). Lac St-Charles, Quebec, Canada CQICIDH, 2001.
13. Desrosiers JNL, Robichaud L, Fougeyrollas P, Rochette A, Viscogliosi C. Validity of the assessment of life habits in older adults. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 177-82.
14. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Noreau L, Bravo G, Rochette A, Bourget A. Participation after a stroke compared to normal aging. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 353-57.
15. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Bravo G, Hebert R, Boutin C. Comparison of two functional independence scales with a participation measure in poststroke rehabilitation. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2003; 37: 157-72.
16. Desrosiers J, Rochette A. Social participation of older adults in Quebec. Aging Clin Exp Res 2004; 16: 406-12.
17. Imbos TJ, Janssen MPE, Berger MPF. Methodologie en statistiek deel I. Universiteit Maastricht, Faculteit der Gezondheidswetenschappen, Universitaire Pers Maastricht, 2001.
18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurements scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press, 2002.
19. Schrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420-28.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990; 20: 337-40.
21. Haley SM, Osborg JS. Kappa coefficient calculation using multiple rating per subject: a special communication. Phys Ther 1989; 69: 970-74.
22. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, 1994.
23. Bot SD, Terwee CB, Van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, De Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of literature. Annu Rheum Disord 2004; 63: 335-41.
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
25. Polit DF, Hungler BP. Nursing research. Principles and methods. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
26. Cardol M, Haan de RJ, Bos van den GAM, Jong de BA, Groot de IJM. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210-16.
27. Desrosiers JMF, Bourbonnais D, Richards CL, Rochette A, Bravo G. Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 666-73.
28. Boschen KA, Gargaro J. Long-term adjustment and community reintegration following spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 157-63.
29. Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P. Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 170-80.