Development and validation of sliding and non-matching grid technology for control surface representation

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering

Volumn 220, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 299-315

  Fenwick, C L ^a   Allen, C B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Control surface; Sliding mesh; Unsteady aerodynamics

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); SURFACE PROPERTIES; UNSTEADY FLOW;

CONTROL SURFACES; SLIDING MESH; UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS;

SLIDING MODE CONTROL;

EID: 33947665079     PISSN: 09544100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544100JAERO36     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kousen, K. A. and Bendiksen, O. O. Non-linear aspects of the transonic aeroelastic stability problem. AIAA Paper No. 88-2306. Also in AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conference, 1988.
2. Kousen, K. A. and Bendlksen, O. O. Limit cycle phenomena in computational transonic aeroelasticity. J. Aircraft, 1994, 31(6), 1257-1263.
3. Alonso, J. J. and Jameson, A. Fully-implicit time-marching aeroelastic solutions, AIAA Paper No. 94-0056, January 1994.
4. Guruswamy, G. P. Unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations for wings using Euler equations. AIAA J., 1990, 28(3), 461-469.
5. Robinson, B. A. Batina, J. T., and Yang, H. T. Y. Aeroelastic analysis of wings using the Euler equations with a deforming mesh. J. Aircraft, 1991, 28(11), 781-788.
6. Meijer, J. J., Hounjet, M. H. L., Eussen, B. J. G., and Prananta, B. B. Nlr-tu delf experience in unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic simulation applications. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, March 1998, Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, pp. 11-1-11-21.
7. Schulze, S. Transonic aeroelastic simulation of a flexible wing section. Technical Report No. 822, AGARD, March 1998. Numerical Unsteady Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Simulation, pp. 10-1-11-20.
8. Goura, G. S. L., Badcock, K. J., Woodgate, M. A., and Richards, B. E. Implicit method for the time marching analysis of flutter. Aeronaut. J., 2001, 105(4), 199-214.
9. Bendiksen, O. O. and Kousen, K. A. Transonic flutter analysis using the Euler equations. AIAA Paper No. 87-0911-CP, 1987.
10. Batina, J. T. and Young, T. Y. Application of transonic codes to aeroelastic modelling of airfoils including active controls. J. Aircraft, 1984, 21(8), 623-630.
11. Lee-Rausch, E.M. and Batina, J. T. Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method. J. Aircraft, 1985, 32(2), 416-422.
12. Stephens, C. H., Arena Jr, A. S., and Gupta, K. K. CFD-based aeroservoelastic predictions with comparisons to benchmark experimental data. AIAA Paper No 99-0766, 1999.
13. Sedaghat, A., Cooper, J. E., Wright, J. R., and Leung, A. Y. T. Curve fitting approach for transonic flutter predicitons. Aeronaut. J., 2003, 107(1075), 565-572.
14. Kandil, O. A., Massey, S. J., and Sheta, E. F. Structural dynamics-CFD interaction for computation of vertical tail buffet. Aeronaut. J., 1996, 100, 297-303.
15. Djayapertapa, L. and Allen, C. B. Aeroservoelastic simulation by time-marching. Aeronaut. J., 2001, 105(1054), 667-678.
16. Taylor, N. V., Allen, C. B., Fenwick, C. L., and Djayapertapa, L. Investigation of flutter suppression by active control. In 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Florida, AIAA Paper No. 2003-3510, 2003.
17. Djayapertapa, L., Allen, C. B., and Fiddes, S. P. Two-dimensional transonic aeroservoelastic computations in the time domain. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 2001, 52(12), 1355-1377.
18. Allen, C. B., Taylor, N. V., Fenwick, C. L., Gaitonde, A. L., and Jones, D. P. A comparison of full nonlinear, and reduced order aerodynamic models in control law design for active flutter suppression. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 2005, 64(12), 1628:1648.
19. Allen, C. B. Aeroelastic computations using algebraic grid motion. Aeronaut. J., 2002, 106(1064), 559-570.
20. Jones, D. P., Gaitonde, A. L., and Fiddes, S. P. Moving mesh generation for unsteady flows about deforming complex geometries. CFD J. Japanese Soc. CFD, 2001, 430-439, Special Issue.
21. Jones, D. P. Force transfer in aeroelastic calculations, Technical Report Department of Aerospace Engineering Report AE046, University of Bristol, 2002.
22. Taylor, N. V., Allen, C. B., Gaitonde, A. L., and Jones, D. P. A structure-coupled CFD method for time-marching flutter analysis. Aeronaut. J., 2004, 108(1086), 389-401.
23. Taylor, N. V., Allen, C. B., Gaitonde, A. L., Jones, D. P., and Hill, G. F. J. Investigation of structural modelling methods for aeroelastic calculations, In Proceedings AIAA 22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Rhode Island, August 2004, Paper 5370.
24. Fenwick, C. L. Consideration of control surfaces in time-domain aeroelastic simulations, Technical Report Department of Aerospace Engineering Report AE045, University of Bristol, 2003.
25. Tang, H. S. and Zhou, T. On nonconservative algorithms for grid interfaces. SIAM J. Numer, Anal., 1999, 37(1), 173-193.
26. Berger, M. J. On conservation at grid interfaces. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1987, 24(5), 967-984.
27. Rai, M. M. A relaxation approach to patched-grid calculations with the Euler equations. Technical Report 85-0295, AIAA, 1985.
28. Rai, M. M. A conservative treatment of zonal boundaries for Euler equation calculations. J. Comput. Phys., 1986, 62(2), 472-503.
29. Lerat, A. and Wu, Z. N. Stable conservative multidomain treatments for implicit Euler solvers. J. Comput. Phys., 1996, 123, 45-64.
30. Bohbot, J., Grondin, G., Corjon, A., and Darracq, D. A parallel multigrid conservative patched/sliding mesh algorithm for turbulent flow computation of 3D complex aircraft configurations. Technical Report 2001-1006, AIAA, 2001.
31. Van-Leer, B. Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations. Lecture Notes Phys., 1982, 170, 507-512.
32. Parpia, I. H. Van-leer flux-vector splitting in moving coordinates. AIM J., 1988, 26, 113-115.
33. Anderson, W. K., Thomas, J. I., and Van-Leer, B. Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equations. AIM. J., 1986, 24, 1453-1460.
34. Jameson, A. Time dependent calculations using multigrid with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils, and wings. Technical Report 91-1596, AIAA, 1991.
35. Allen, C. B. Multigrid convergence of inviscid fixed-, and rotary-wing flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 2002, 39(2), 121-140.
36. Allen, C. B. An unsteady multiblock multigrid scheme for lifting forward flight simulation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 2004, 45(9), 973-984.
37. Scott, R. C., Hoadley, S. T., Wieseman, C. D., and Durham, M. H. The benchmark active controls technology model aerodynamic data. Technical Report 97-0829, AIAA, 1997.
38. Waszak, M. R. Modelling the benchmark active control technology wind-tunnel model for application to flutter suppression. Technical Report 96-3437, AIAA, 1996.