Diversity in random subspacing ensembles

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3181, Issue , 2004, Pages 309-319

  Tsymbal, Alexey ^a   Pechenizkiy, Mykola ^b   Cunningham, Pádraig ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA MINING; DATA WAREHOUSES;

ACCURACY IMPROVEMENT; CORRELATION VALUE; CURRENT DIRECTION; DIVERSITY MEASURE; ENSEMBLE INTEGRATION; INTEGRATION METHOD; UCI MACHINE LEARNING REPOSITORY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35048891116     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30076-2_31     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bauer E., R. Kohavi, An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: bagging, boosting, and variants, Machine Learning, 36 (1,2) (1999) 105-139.
2. Blake C.L., E. Keogh, C.J. Merz, UCI repository of machine learning databases [http:// www.ics.uci.edu/ ~mleam/ MLRepository.html], Dept. of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 1999.
3. Bradley C., T. Lane, Creating and exploiting coverage and diversity, in: Proc. AAAI-96 Workshop on Integrating Multiple Learned Models, Portland, OR, 1996, pp. 8-14.
4. th European Conf. On Machine Learning, Barcelona, Spain, LNCS 1810, Springer, 2000, pp. 109-116.
5. Dietterich T.G., An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, and randomization, Machine Learning 40 (2) (2000) 139-157.
6. Dietterich T.G., Machine learning research: four current directions, AI Magazine 18(4) (1997)97-136.
7. Domingos P., M. Pazzani, On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss, Machine Learning, 29 (2,3) (1997) 103-130.
8. Giacinto G., F. Roli. Design of effective neural network ensembles for image classification processes. Image Vision and Computing Journal, 19(9-10):699-707, 2001.
9. Ho T.K., The random subspace method for constructing decision forests, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20 (8) (1998) 832-844.
10. Krogh A., J. Vedelsby, Neural network ensembles, cross validation, and active learning, In: D. Touretzky, T. Leen (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 7, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995, pp. 231-238.
11. Kuncheva L.I., C.J. Whitaker, Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Machine Learning 51 (2) (2003) 181-207.
12. th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, 1999, pp. 379-384.
13. Puuronen S., V. Terziyan, A. Tsymbal, A dynamic integration algorithm for an ensemble of classifiers, in: Z.W. Ras, A. Skowron (eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Systems: 11th Int. Symp. ISMIS'99, Warsaw, Poland, LNAI 1609, Springer, 1999, pp. 592-600.
14. Schaffer C., Selecting a classification method by cross-validation, Machine Learning 13 (1993) 135-143.
15. Shipp C.A., L.I. Kuncheva, Relationship between combination methods and measures of diversity in combining classifiers, Information Fusion 3 (2002) 135-148.
16. Skalak D.B., The sources of increased accuracy for two proposed boosting algorithms, in: AAAI-96 Workshop on Integrating Multiple Models for Improving and Scaling Machine Learning Algorithms (in conjunction with AAAI-96), Portland, Oregon, USA, 1996, pp. 120-125.
17. nd Int. Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems MCS 2001, Cambridge, UK, 2001, pp. 1-10.
18. Tsymbal A., S. Puuronen, D. Patterson, Ensemble feature selection with the simple Bayesian classification, Information Fusion, Elsevier Science 4 (2) (2003) 87-100.
19. Tsymbal A., S. Puuronen, I. Skrypnyk, Ensemble feature selection with dynamic integration of classifiers, in: Int. ICSC Congress on Computational Intelligence Methods and Applications CIMA'2001, Bangor, Wales, U.K. 2001, pp. 558-564.