A meta-model framework for software process modeling

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2559, Issue , 2002, Pages 532-545

  Visconti, Marcello ^a   Cook, Curtis R ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

^b Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROCESS ENGINEERING;

KEY PRACTICES; MATURITY LEVELS; PROCESS AREAS; PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SINGLE PROCESS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; SOFTWARE PROCESS MODELING;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 35048848985     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36209-6_44     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. R. Basque. CBA IPI: How to build software process improvement success in the evaluation phase?, IEEE Computer Society Software Process Newsletter, 5(Winter 1996).
2. I. Burnstein, T. Suwannasart and C. Carlson. Developing a testing maturity model: part I. CrossTalk, 9(8)(1996) 21-24
3. I. Burnstein, T. Suwannasart and C. Carlson. Developing a testing maturity model: part II. CrossTalk, 9(9)(1996) 19-26
4. D. Bustard, R. Oakes and Z. He. Models to promote effective system change, in Proceedings of International Conference of Software Maintenance, Oxford, UK, September 1999, pp. 297-304
5. C. Cook and M. Visconti. What to do after the assessment report?, in Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1999 (PNSQC, Portland, 1999), pp. 214-228
6. C. Debou and A. Kuntzmann-Combelles. Linking software process improvement to business strategies: experiences from industry. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 5(1) (2000) 55-64
7. J. Favaro and S.L. Pfleeger. Making software development investment decisions. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 23(5) (1998) 69-74
8. B.S. Ghotra. Software Configuration Management (SCM) Support Process Capability Maturity Model, Master´s Project (Computer Science Department, Oregon State University, 2001)
9. R. Grady. Successful software process improvement (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1997)
10. E.M. Gray and W.L. Smith. On the limitations of software process assessments and the recognition of a required re-orientation for global process improvement. Software Quality Journal7(1998) 21-34
11. R. McFeely. IDEAL: a user's guide for software process improvement. Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-HB-001 (CMU/SEI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1996)
12. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. Capability Maturity Model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4) (1993) 18-27
13. M. Paulk, C. Weber, S. Garcia, M. Chrissis and M. Bush. Key practices of the Capability Maturity Model version 1.1. Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-025(CMU/SEI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1993)
14. S. Shrum. Choosing a CMMI Model Representation. CrossTalk, 13(7) (2000) 6-7
15. J. Trienekens, R. Kusters and R. Van Solingen. Product Focused Software Process Improvement: Concepts and Experiences from Industry. Software Quality Journal9(2001), 269-281
16. M. Visconti and C. Cook. Evolution of a maturity model – critical evaluation and lessons learned. Software Quality Journal7(3/4)(1998), 223-237
17. M. Visconti and C. Cook. A meta-model for software process maturity, in Proceedings of FESMA-AEMES Software Measurement Conference 2000, October 2000, Madrid, Spain
18. M. Visconti and C. Cook. A meta-model framework for software process modeling, Technical Report 02-60-02, Computer Science Department, Oregon State University, March 2002
19. J. Voas. Can clean pipes produce dirty water?. IEEE Software, 14(4)(1997) 93-95
20. K. Wiegers and D. Sturzenberger. A modular software process mini-assessment method. IEEE Software, 17(1)(2000) 62-69