Modular software process mini-assessment method

IEEE Software

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 62-69

  Wiegers, Karl E ^a   Sturzenberger, Doris C ^b  

^a Process Impact   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; PROCESS ENGINEERING;

CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL (CMM);

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0343192524     PISSN: 07407459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/52.819970     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. M.C. Paulk et al., eds., The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, Mass., 1995.
2. M. Daskalantonakis, "Achieving Higher SEI Levels," IEEE Software, Vol. 11, No. 4, July 1994, pp. 17-24.
3. R. Whitney et al., Interim Profile: Development and Trial of a Method to Rapidly Measure Software Engineering Maturity Status, Tech. Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-4, Software Eng. Inst., Pittsburgh, Penn., 1994.
4. M. Wakulczyk, "NSSF Spot Check: A Metric Toward CMM Level 2," CrossTalk, July 1995, pp. 23-24.
5. S. Masters and C. Bothwell, CMM Appraisal Framework, version 1.0, Tech. Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-001, Software Eng. Inst., Pittsburgh, 1995.
6. D. Zubrow et al., Maturity Questionnaire, Tech. Report CMU/SEI-94-SR-007, Software Eng. Inst., Pittsburgh, Penn., 1994.
7. K. Wiegers, "Software Process Improvement: Ten Traps to Avoid," Software Development, May 1996, pp. 51-58.