Elicitation of use cases for product lines

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3014, Issue , 2004, Pages 152-167

  Fantechi, Alessandro ^a   Gnesi, Stefania ^b   John, Isabel ^c   Lami, Giuseppe ^b   Dörr, Jörg ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b ISTI CNR   (Italy)

^c FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

EXISTING SYSTEMS; KEY ISSUES; PRODUCT LINE MODEL; PRODUCT LINE REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES; USER DOCUMENTATIONS; VARIABILITY MODEL;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 35048845167     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_12     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. I. Alexander and F. Kiedaisch. Towards recyclable system requirements. In ECBS'02, 9th IEEE Conference and Workshops on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, April 2002, Lund, Sweden, 2002.
2. G. Arango. Domain analysis methods. In W. Shaefer, R. Prieto-Diaz, and M. Matsumoto, editors, Software Reusability. Ellis Horwood, 1993.
3. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern information retrieval. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
4. J. Bayer, O. Flege, P. Knauber, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, K. Schmid, T. Widen, and J.-M. DeBaud. PuLSE: A Methodology to Develop Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR'99). Los Angeles, CA, USA, May 1999. ACM.
5. A. Bertolino, A. Fantechi, S. Gnesi, G. Lami, A. Maccari, Use Case Description of Requirements for Product Lines, REPL'02, Essen, Germany, September 2002.
6. Robert Biddle, James Noble, and Ewan Tempero. Supporting Reusable Use Cases. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Software Reuse, April 2002.
7. P. C. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, August 2001
8. A. Cockburn. Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison Wesley, 2001.
9. J.-M. DeBaud and K. Schmid. A Practical Comparison of Major Domain Analysis Approaches - Towards a Customizable Domain Analysis Framework. In Proceedings of SEKE'98,San Francisco, USA June 1998.
10. F. Fabbrini, M. Fusani, S. Gnesi, and G. Lami. The linguistic approach to the natural language requirements quality; benefit o the use of an automatic tool. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Computer Society Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center Software Engineering Workshop, 2001.
11. A. Fantechi, S. Gnesi, G. Lami, and A. Maccari, Application of Linguistic Techniques for Use Case Analysis, RE'02, Essen, Germany, September 2002
12. J. A. Goguen, Charlotte Linde, Techniques for Requirements Elicitation, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, p.152-163, 1993
13. G. Halmans, K. Pohl Communicating the Variability of a Software-Product Family to Customers Journal of Software and Systems Modeling, Springer, 2003 to appear
14. I. John. Integrating Legacy Documentation Assets into a Product Line. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE-4), Bilbao, Spain, October 2001.
15. I. John, D. Muthig, Tailoring Use Cases for Product Line Modeling, REPL'02, Essen, Germany, September 2002
16. I. John, J. Dörr. Extracting Product Line Model Elements from User Documentation. Technical Report, Fraunhofer IESE, 2003
17. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and S. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, November 1990.
18. F. van der Linden. Software Product Families in Europe: The Esaps and Café Projects. IEEE Software, 19(4):41-49, JulyAugust 2002.
19. Y. S. Maarek, D. M. Berry, and G. E. Kaiser. GURU: Information retrieval for reuse. In P. Hall, editor. Landmark Contributions in Software Reuse and Reverse Engineering. Unicom Seminars Ltd, 1994.
20. M. Mannion, B. Keepence, H. Kaindl, and J. Wheadon. Reusing Single System Requirements for Application Family Requirements. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'99), May 1999.
21. B. Paech and K. Kohler. Task-driven Requirements in Object-oriented Development. In Leite, J., Doorn, J., (eds) Perspectives on Requirements Engineering, Kluver Academic Publishers, 2003, to appear
22. P. Rayson, L. Emmet, R. Garside, and P. Sawyer. The REVERE project: experiments with the application of probabilistic nip to systems engineering. In Pro-ceedings of 5th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB'2000). Versailles, France, June, LNCS 1959, 2000.
23. K. Schmid and M. Verlage. The Economic Impact of Product Line Adoption and Evolution. IEEE Software, 19(4):50-57, JulyAugust 2002.
24. Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS). Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, Version 2.0, June 1996.
25. B. Tschaitschian, C. Wenzel, and I. John. Tuning the quality of informal software requirements with KARAT. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations of Software Quality (REFSQ'97), 1997.
26. D. M. Weiss and C.T.R. Lai. Software Product Line Engineering: A Family Based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
27. http://www.whatis.com
28. C.D. Wickens. Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (eds.), Varieties of attention (pp.63-101). New York, 1984, Academic Press