Assessing the state of software documentation practices

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3009, Issue , 2004, Pages 485-496

  Visconti, Marcello ^a   Cook, Curtis R ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

^b Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment results; Degree of satisfaction; Key practices; Maturity model; System documentation process

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE; ASSESSMENT RESULTS; DEGREE OF SATISFACTION; KEY PRACTICES; MATURITY MODEL; PROCESS MATURITY; SOFTWARE DOCUMENTATION; SOFTWARE INDUSTRY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 35048833792     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_35     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. D. Card, F. McGarry and G. Page. Evaluating software engineering technologies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(7) (1987) 845-851
2. C. Cook and M. Visconti. Documentation is important. CrossTalk, 7(11) (1994) 26-30
3. C. Cook and M. Visconti. New and improved documentation process model, in Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1996 (PNSQC, Portland, 1996), pp. 364-380
4. W. Humphrey. Managing the software process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1989)
5. B. Lientz and E. Swanson. Problems in applications software maintenance. Communications of the ACM . 24(11) (1981) 763-769
6. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. The Capability Maturity Model guidelines for improving the software process (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1995)
7. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis and C. Weber. Capability Maturity Model, version 1.1 IEEE Software, 10(4) (1993) 18-27
8. J. Pence and S. Hon III. Building software quality into telecommunications network systems. Quality Progress, (October 1993) 95-97
9. H. Rombach and V. Basili. Quantitative assessment of maintenance: an industrial case study, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Austin, Texas, September 1987 (IEEE, Washington, 1987), pp. 134-144
10. M. Visconti and C. Cook. A software system documentation process maturity approach to software quality, in Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1993 (PNSQC, Portland, 1993), pp. 257-271
11. M. Visconti and C. Cook. Evolution of a maturity model - critical evaluation and lessons learned. Software Quality Journal 7, 223-237 (1998)
12. C. Cook and M. Visconti. What to do after the assessment report?, in Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Portland, Oregon, October 1999 (PNSQC, Portland, 1999), pp. 214-228
13. M. Visconti and C. Cook. A meta-model framework for software process modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2559, Springer-Verlag, 532-545 (2002).