Presentation Software in the College Classroom: Don't Forget the Instructor

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 53-57

  Hardin, Erin E ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948907292     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00986280709336652     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Benjamin L. T. Jr. (2002). Lecturing. In Davis S. F. Buskist W. (eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 57–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Buskist W. Sikorski J. Buckley T. Saville B. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. In Davis S. F. Buskist W. (eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Chanlin L.-J. (1998). Animation to teach students of different knowledge levels. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 166–175.
4. DeBord K. A. Aruguete M. S. Muhlig J. (2004). Are computer-assisted teaching methods effective? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 65–68.
5. Kulik C. C. Kulik J. A. Cohen P. A. (1980). Instructional technology and college teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 199–205.
6. Smith S. M. Woody P. C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 220–223.
7. Tufte E. R. (2004). The cognitive style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics.
8. Young J. R. (2004a, August 13). Students say technology has little impact on teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, p. A28.
9. Young J. R. (2004b, November 12). When good technology means bad teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, 51, p. A31.