Efficient indexing for articulation invariant shape matching and retrieval

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Biswas, Soma ^a   Aggarwal, Gaurav ^b   Chellarjpa, Rama ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATABASE SYSTEMS; FEATURE EXTRACTION; GEOMETRY; IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

PAIRWISE GEOMETRIC RELATIONSHIPS; SHAPE MATCHING;

PATTERN MATCHING;

EID: 34948893431     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383227     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(4):509-522, 2002.
2. H. Chui and A. Rangarajan. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 89:114-141, 2003.
3. A. Elad and R. Kimmel. On bending invariant signatures for surfaces. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(10): 1285-1295, 2003.
4. Y. Gdalyahu and D. Weinshall. Flexible syntactic matching of curves and its applications to automatic hierarchical classification of silhouettes. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(12):1312-1328, 1999.
5. R. S. Germain, A. Califano, and S. Colville. Fingerprint matching using transformation parameter clustering. Computational Science and Engineering, 4(4):42-49, 1997.
6. A. B. Hamza and H. Krim. Geodesic object representation and recognition. In DGCI, LNCS 2886, pages 378-387, 2003.
7. C. Y. Ip, D. Lapadat, L. Sieger, and W. C. Regli. Using shape distributions to compare solid models. In ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications, pages 273-280, 2002.
8. Y. Lamdan and H. J. Wolf son. Geometric hashing: a general and efficient model-based recognition scheme. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, pages 238-249, 1988.
9. L. J. Latecki and R. Lakamper. Shape similarity measure based on correspondence of visual parts. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(10): 1185-1190, 2000.
10. L. J. Latecki, R. Lakamper, and U. Eckhardt. Shape descriptors for non-rigid shapes with a single closed contour. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 424-429, 2000.
11. H. Ling and D. W. Jacobs. Using the inner-distance for classification of articulated shapes. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 719-726, 2005.
12. Y Liu, H. Zha, and H. Qin. The generalized shape distributions for shape matching and analysis. In Intl. Conf. on Shape Modeling and Applications, 2002.
13. F. Mokhtarian, F. Abbasi, and J. Kittler. Efficient and robust retrieval by shape content through curvature scale space. Image Databases and Multimedia Search, pages 51-58, 1997.
14. G. Mori, S. Belongie, and J. Malik. Shape contexts enable efficient retrieval of similar shapes. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 723-730, 2001.
15. G. Mori and J. Malik. Recognizing objects in adversarial clutter: breaking a visual captcha. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 134-141, 2003.
16. D. Nister and H. Stewenius. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2161- 2168, 2006.
17. R. Ohbuchi, T. Minamitani, and T. Takei. Shape-similarity search of 3d models by using enhanced shape functions. In Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics, pages 97-104, 2003.
18. R. Osada, T. Funkhouser, B. Chazelle, and D. Dobkin. Shape distributions. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21(4), 2002.
19. S. Sarkar, P. J. Phillips, Z. Liu, I. Robledo, P. Grother, and K. W. Bowyer. The human ID gait challenge problem: Data sets, performance, and analysis. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(2):162-177, 2005.
20. T. B. Sebastian, P. N. Klein, and B. B. Kimia. Recognition of shapes by editing their shock graphs. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(5):550-571, 2004.
21. T. B. Sebastian, P. N. Klien, and B. B. Kimia. On aligning curves. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(1):116-125, 2003.
22. D. Sharvit, J. Chan, H. Tek, and B. B. Kimia. Symmetry-based indexing of image databases. Journal Visual Comm. and Image Representation, 9(4):366-380, 1998.
23. K. Siddiqi, A. Shokoufandeh, S. J. Dickinson, and S. W. Zucker. Shock graphs and shape matching. Intl. Journal on Computer Vision, 35(1): 13-32, 1999.
24. A. Thayananthan, B. Stenger, P. H. S. Torr, and R. Cipolla. Shape context and chamfer matching in cluttered scenes. In Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 127-133, 2003.
25. Z. Tu and A. L. Yuille. Shape matching and recognition: Using generative models and informative features. In European Conf. on Computer Vision, pages 195-209, 2004.