Shape context and chamfer matching in cluttered scenes

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Thayananthan, A ^a   Stenger, B ^a   Torr, P H S ^b   Cipolla, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; EDGE DETECTION; FUNCTIONS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CHAMFER MATCHING; SHAPE CONTEXT; SHAPE MATCHING; VITERBI ALGORITHM;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 0042440711     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. H. G. Barrow, J. M. Tenenbaum, R. C. Bolles, and H. C. Wolf. Parametric correspondence and chamfer matching: Two new techniques for image matching. In Proc. 5th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pages 659-663, 1977.
2. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell., 24(4):509-522, April 2002.
3. P. J. Besl and N. McKay, A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell., 14(2):239-256, March 1992.
4. G. Borgefors. Hierarchical chamfer matching: A parametric edge matching algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell., 10(6):849-865, November 1988.
5. Y. Chen and G. Medioni: Object modeling by registration of multiple range images. Image and Vision Computing, 10(3):145-155, April 1992.
6. H. Chui and A. Rangarajan. A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2003, in press.
7. A. Fitzgibbon. Robust registration of 2D and 3D point sets. In Proc. British Machine Vision Conference, volume II, pages 411-420, Manchester, UK, September 2001.
8. D. M. Gavrila. Pedestrian detection from a moving vehicle. Proc. 6th European Conf. on Computer Vision, volume II, pages 37-49, Dublin, Ireland, June/July 2000.
9. D. M. Gavrila and L. S. Davis. 3-D model-based tracking of humans in action: a multi-view approach. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 73-80, San Francisco, June 1996.
10. S. Gold, A. Rangarajan, C.-P. Lu, and E. Mjolsness. New algorithms for 2D and 3D point matching: Pose estimation and correspondence. Pattern Recognition, 31(8):1019-1031, 1998.
11. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pages 259-268, London, June 1987.
12. G. Mori and J. Malik. Estimating human body configurations using shape context matching. In Proc. 7th European Conf. on Computer Vision, volume III, pages 666-680, Copenhagen, Denmark, May 2002.
13. G. Mori and J. Malik. Recognizing objects in adversarial clutter - breaking a visual captcha. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Madison, USA, June 2003 in press.
14. C. F. Olson and D. P. Huttenlocher, Automatic target recognition by matching oriented edge pixels. Transactions on Image Processing, 6(1):103-113, January 1997.
15. B. Stenger, P. R. S. Mendonca and R. Cipolla. Model based 3D tracking of an articulated hand. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume II, pages 310-315, Kauai, USA, December 2001.
16. J. Sullivan and S. Carlsson. Recognizing and tracking human action. In Proc. 7th European Conf. on Computer Vision, volume I, pages 629-644, Copenhagen, Denmark, May 2002.
17. L. von Ahn, M. Blum, and J. Langford. Telling humans and computers apart (automatically) or how lazy cryptographers do AI. Technical Report TR CMU-CS-02-117, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, February 2002.