Justice: Social-psychological perspectives

Justice as a Basic Human Need

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 85-93

  Fischer, Ronald ^a   Skitka, Linda J ^b  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948890726     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (vol. 2). 267-296. New York: Academia Press.
2. Bies, R.J. and Moag, J.S. (1986). Interactional Justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard and B.H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations. (vol. 1). (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H. and Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
4. Cropanzano, R. and Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunnelling through the maze. In C.L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology. (vol.12). (pp. 317-372). Chichester: Wiley.
5. Crosby, F. J. (1982). Relative deprivation and the working woman. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
7. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-50.
8. Farh, J., Earley, P.C., and Lin, S. (1997). A cultural analysis of justice and organisational citizenship behaviour in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421-444.
9. Fischer, R. and Smith, P. B. (2003). Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 251-268.
10. Fischer, R. and Smith, P. B. (2004a). Values and organizational justice: Performance and seniority-based allocation criteria in UK and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
11. Fischer, R. and Smith, P. B. (2004b). Who cares about justice? The moderating effect of values on the link between organisational justice and work behaviour. Paper submitted for publication.
12. Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, and D. P. Skarlicki. (Eds.). Research in social issues in management. (vol. 1). (pp. 3-33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
13. Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks: London, Sage.
14. Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice. (pp.1-55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
16. Gurr, T. T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in human behaviour: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1-20.
18. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
19. Lerner, M. J., and Simmons, C. H. (1966). Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
20. Lam, S.S.K., Schaubroeck, J., and Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between organisational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 23, 1-18.
21. Leung, K. and Tong, K. K. (2003). A normative model of justice. In D. Skarlicki, S. Gilliland, and D. Steiner (Eds.), Research in Social Issues in Management. (vol. 3). (pp. 97-120). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
22. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz and E. Walster. (Eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology. (vol. 9) (pp. 91-131). New York: Academia Press.
23. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, and R.H. Willis. (Eds.). Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. (pp. 27-54). New York: Plenum.
24. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano. (Eds.). Advances in organizational justice. (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Lind, E.A., Kanfer, R. and Earley, P.C. (1990). Voice, control and procedural fairness instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
26. Lind. E. A., Kulik, C.T., Ambrose, M., and de Vera Park, M.V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 224-251.
27. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
28. Lind, E.A., Tyler, T.R. and Huo, Y.J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variations in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
29. Lissowski, G., Tyszka, T. and Okrasa, W. (1991). Principles of distributive justice: Experiments in Poland and America. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 98-119.
30. Murphy-Berman, V., Berman, J., Singh, P., Pachauri, A., and Kumar, P. (1984). Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1267-72.
31. Rousseau, D.M., and Parks, J.M. (1992). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In B. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. (vol.15). (pp. 1-44). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32. Schroeder, D. A., Steel, J. E., Woodell, A. J. and Bembenek, A. F. (2003). Justice within social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 374-387.
33. Skitka, L. J. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 286-297.
34. Skitka, L. J. and Houston, D. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14, 305-326.
35. Skitka, L. J. and Mullen, E. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419-1429.
36. Skitka, L. J., Winquist, J. and Hutchinson, S. (2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16, 309-341.
37. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., and Williams, R. A. (1949). The American Soldier: Adjustments during army life. (vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. (vol. 25). (pp.115-19). San Diego, CA: Academia Press.
40. Tyler, T.R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H.J., and Huo, Y.J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41. Van Prooijen, J.W., van den Bos, K., and Wilke, H.A.M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1353-1361.