-
1
-
-
3043004277
-
A process for assessment exercise design: A model of best practice
-
Ahmed, Y., Payne, T., & Whiddett, S. (1997). A process for assessment exercise design: A model of best practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 62-68.
-
(1997)
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
, vol.5
, pp. 62-68
-
-
Ahmed, Y.1
Payne, T.2
Whiddett, S.3
-
2
-
-
0037356392
-
A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions
-
Arthur, W., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 56, 125-154.
-
(2003)
Personnel Psychology
, vol.56
, pp. 125-154
-
-
Arthur, W.1
Day, E.A.2
McNelly, T.L.3
Edens, P.S.4
-
7
-
-
58149366938
-
Meta-analysis of assessment center validity
-
Gaugler, B., Rosenthal, D., Thornton, G., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493-511.
-
(1987)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.72
, pp. 493-511
-
-
Gaugler, B.1
Rosenthal, D.2
Thornton, G.3
Bentson, C.4
-
8
-
-
0003506109
-
-
5th ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
-
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
-
(1998)
Multivariate data analysis
-
-
Hair, J.F.1
Anderson, R.E.2
Tatham, R.L.3
Black, W.C.4
-
9
-
-
21144474444
-
Does the assessment center scoring method affect the cross-situational consistency of ratings?
-
Harris, M. M., Becker, A. S., & Smith, D. E. (1993). Does the assessment center scoring method affect the cross-situational consistency of ratings? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 675-678.
-
(1993)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.78
, pp. 675-678
-
-
Harris, M.M.1
Becker, A.S.2
Smith, D.E.3
-
10
-
-
0034258532
-
Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations
-
International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines
-
International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2000). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Public Personnel Management, 29, 315-331.
-
(2000)
Public Personnel Management
, vol.29
, pp. 315-331
-
-
-
11
-
-
23844531682
-
Rating tasks versus dimensions in assessment centers: A psychometric comparison
-
Jackson, D. J. R., Stillman, J. A., & Atkins, S. G. (2005). Rating tasks versus dimensions in assessment centers: A psychometric comparison. Human Performance, 18, 213-241.
-
(2005)
Human Performance
, vol.18
, pp. 213-241
-
-
Jackson, D.J.R.1
Stillman, J.A.2
Atkins, S.G.3
-
12
-
-
85016915958
-
Managerial functions: An alternative to traditional assessment center dimensions
-
Joyce, L. W., Thayer, P. W., & Pond, S. B. (1994). Managerial functions: An alternative to traditional assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 47, 109-121.
-
(1994)
Personnel Psychology
, vol.47
, pp. 109-121
-
-
Joyce, L.W.1
Thayer, P.W.2
Pond, S.B.3
-
13
-
-
1842810086
-
Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings
-
Lance, C. E., Lambert, T. A., Gewin, A. G., Lievens, F., & Conway, J. M. (2004). Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 377-385.
-
(2004)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.89
, pp. 377-385
-
-
Lance, C.E.1
Lambert, T.A.2
Gewin, A.G.3
Lievens, F.4
Conway, J.M.5
-
14
-
-
0034376812
-
Assessment center exercise factors represent cross-situational specificity, not method bias
-
Lance, C. E., Newbolt, W. H., Gatewood, R. D., Foster, M. R., French, N. R., & Smith, D. (2000). Assessment center exercise factors represent cross-situational specificity, not method bias. Human Performance, 13, 323-353.
-
(2000)
Human Performance
, vol.13
, pp. 323-353
-
-
Lance, C.E.1
Newbolt, W.H.2
Gatewood, R.D.3
Foster, M.R.4
French, N.R.5
Smith, D.6
-
15
-
-
85047672744
-
A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data
-
Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228-244.
-
(2002)
Psychological Methods
, vol.7
, pp. 228-244
-
-
Lance, C.E.1
Noble, C.L.2
Scullen, S.E.3
-
16
-
-
0032336405
-
Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: A review
-
Lievens, F. (1998). Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: A review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 141-152.
-
(1998)
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
, vol.6
, pp. 141-152
-
-
Lievens, F.1
-
17
-
-
0035542053
-
Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies
-
Lievens, F., & Conway, J. M. (2001). Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1202-1222.
-
(2001)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.86
, pp. 1202-1222
-
-
Lievens, F.1
Conway, J.M.2
-
18
-
-
0001591057
-
Understanding the assessment center process: Where are we now?
-
C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson Eds, Chichester, UK: Wiley
-
Lievens, F., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Understanding the assessment center process: Where are we now? In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 16 (pp. 245-286). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
-
(2001)
International review of industrial and organizational psychology
, vol.16
, pp. 245-286
-
-
Lievens, F.1
Klimoski, R.J.2
-
19
-
-
0001012466
-
An empirical test of a trait-oriented job analysis technique
-
Lopez, F. M., Kesselman, G. A., & Lopez, F. E. (1981). An empirical test of a trait-oriented job analysis technique. Personnel Psychology, 34, 479-502.
-
(1981)
Personnel Psychology
, vol.34
, pp. 479-502
-
-
Lopez, F.M.1
Kesselman, G.A.2
Lopez, F.E.3
-
20
-
-
84937294109
-
The assessment center process: Assessing leadership in the public sector
-
Lowry, P. E. (1995). The assessment center process: Assessing leadership in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 24, 443-450.
-
(1995)
Public Personnel Management
, vol.24
, pp. 443-450
-
-
Lowry, P.E.1
-
21
-
-
0030304047
-
A survey of the assessment center process in the public sector
-
Lowry, P. E. (1996). A survey of the assessment center process in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 25, 307-321.
-
(1996)
Public Personnel Management
, vol.25
, pp. 307-321
-
-
Lowry, P.E.1
-
23
-
-
0000768380
-
Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency
-
Mischel, W. (1984). Convergences and challenges in the search for consistency. American Psychologist, 39, 351-364.
-
(1984)
American Psychologist
, vol.39
, pp. 351-364
-
-
Mischel, W.1
-
24
-
-
0348237305
-
The empirical and content validity of assessment centers vs. traditional methods for predicting managerial success
-
Norton, S. D. (1977). The empirical and content validity of assessment centers vs. traditional methods for predicting managerial success. Academy of Management Review, 2, 442-445.
-
(1977)
Academy of Management Review
, vol.2
, pp. 442-445
-
-
Norton, S.D.1
-
25
-
-
84933492567
-
Mechanical vs. consensus-derived assessment center ratings: A comparison of job performance validities
-
Pynes, J., & Bernardin, H. J. (1992). Mechanical vs. consensus-derived assessment center ratings: A comparison of job performance validities. Public Personnel Management, 21, 17-28.
-
(1992)
Public Personnel Management
, vol.21
, pp. 17-28
-
-
Pynes, J.1
Bernardin, H.J.2
-
26
-
-
33751564117
-
Should assessment center dimension ratings be mechanically-derived?
-
Pynes, J., Bernardin, H. J., Benton, A. L., & McEvoy, G. M. (1988). Should assessment center dimension ratings be mechanically-derived? Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 217-227.
-
(1988)
Journal of Business and Psychology
, vol.2
, pp. 217-227
-
-
Pynes, J.1
Bernardin, H.J.2
Benton, A.L.3
McEvoy, G.M.4
-
27
-
-
84986685611
-
Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reaction
-
Robertson, I. T., & Kandola, R. S. (1982). Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reaction. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 55, 171-183.
-
(1982)
Journal of Occupational Psychology
, vol.55
, pp. 171-183
-
-
Robertson, I.T.1
Kandola, R.S.2
-
29
-
-
0001365167
-
Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings
-
Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401-410.
-
(1982)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.67
, pp. 401-410
-
-
Sackett, P.R.1
Dreher, G.F.2
-
30
-
-
85047683514
-
A new frame for frame-of-reference training: Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers
-
Schleicher, D. J., Day, D. V., Mayes, B. T., & Riggio, R. E. (2002). A new frame for frame-of-reference training: Enhancing the construct validity of assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 735-746.
-
(2002)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.87
, pp. 735-746
-
-
Schleicher, D.J.1
Day, D.V.2
Mayes, B.T.3
Riggio, R.E.4
-
31
-
-
0032391899
-
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings
-
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
-
(1998)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.124
, pp. 262-274
-
-
Schmidt, F.L.1
Hunter, J.E.2
-
32
-
-
84991167729
-
Influence of assessment center methods on assessors' ratings
-
Silverman, W. H., Dalessio, A., Woods, S. B., & Johnson, R. L. (1986). Influence of assessment center methods on assessors' ratings. Personnel Psychology, 39, 565-578.
-
(1986)
Personnel Psychology
, vol.39
, pp. 565-578
-
-
Silverman, W.H.1
Dalessio, A.2
Woods, S.B.3
Johnson, R.L.4
-
33
-
-
0031097814
-
A survey of assessment center practices in organizations in the United States
-
Spychalski, A. C., Quinones, M. A., Gaugler, B. B., & Pohley, J. (1997). A survey of assessment center practices in organizations in the United States. Personnel Psychology, 50, 71-90.
-
(1997)
Personnel Psychology
, vol.50
, pp. 71-90
-
-
Spychalski, A.C.1
Quinones, M.A.2
Gaugler, B.B.3
Pohley, J.4
-
35
-
-
0014337960
-
Signs, samples, and criteria
-
Wernimont, P., & Campbell, J. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372-376.
-
(1968)
Journal of Applied Psychology
, vol.52
, pp. 372-376
-
-
Wernimont, P.1
Campbell, J.2
-
36
-
-
0037391873
-
The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors
-
Woehr, D. J., & Arthur, W. (2003). The construct-related validity of assessment center ratings: A review and meta-analysis of the role of methodological factors. Journal of Management, 29, 231-258.
-
(2003)
Journal of Management
, vol.29
, pp. 231-258
-
-
Woehr, D.J.1
Arthur, W.2
|