salicylate ototoxicity and its implications for cochlear microphonic potential generation

Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 173-188

  Peleg, Uri ^a   Perez, Ronen ^a   Freeman, Sharon ^b   Sohmer, Haim ^b  

^a SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

ABR; CM; cochlea; DPOAE; outer hair cells; transduction; VsEP

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE; MOLECULAR MOTOR; PRESTIN; SALICYLATE SODIUM; SALICYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HAIR CELL; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NONHUMAN; OTOTOXICITY; PSAMMOMYS OBESUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; GERBILLINAE; SALICYLIC ACID;

EID: 34948858981     PISSN: 07926855     EISSN: 21910286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JBCPP.2007.18.3.173     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Oliver, D, He, DZ, Kiocker, N, Ludwig, J, Waldegger, S, Ruppersberg, JP, Dallos, P, Fakier, B. Intracellular anions as the voltage sensor of prestin, the outer hair cell motor protein. Science 2001; 292: 2340–2343.
2. Fujimura, K, Yoshida, M, Makishima, K. Effect of salicylate and short-term sound exposure on extracochlear electrically-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121:781–786.
3. Kujawa, SG, Fallon, M, Bobbin, RP. Intracochlear salicylate reduces low-intensity acoustic and cochlear microphonic distortion products. Hear Res 1992;64:73–80.
4. Fitzgerald, JJ, Robertson, D, Johnstone, BM. Effects of intra-cochlear perfusion of salicylates on cochlear microphonic and other auditory responses in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1993;67: 147–156.
5. Calverley, DC, Roth, G. Antiplatelet therapy. Aspirin, ticlopidine/clopidogrel, and anti-integrin agents. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1998; 12: 1231–1249.
6. Sohmer, H, Pratt, H. Recording of the cochlear microphonic potential with surface electrodes. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1976; 40: 253–260.
7. Plotnik, M, Elidan, J, Mager, M, Sohmer, H. Short latency vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) to linear acceleration impulses in rats. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 104: 522–530.
8. Ruggero, MA, Rich, NC. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci 1991; 11: 1057–1067.
9. Adler, HJ, Belyantseva, lA, Merritt, RC, Jr., Frolenkov, GI, Dougherty, GW, Kachar, B. Expression of prestin, a membrane motor protein, in the mammalian auditory and vestibular periphery. Hear Res 2003; 184: 27–40.
10. Syka, J, Melichar, I. The effect of loop diuretics upon summating potentials in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1985; 20: 267–273.
11. Silverstein, H, Bernstein, JM, Davies, DG. Salicylate ototoxicity. A biochemical and electrophysiological study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967;76: 118–128.
12. Stypulkowski, PH. Mechanisms of salicylate ototoxicity. Hear Res 1990; 46: 113–145.
13. Mitchell, C, Brummett, R, Himes, D, Vernon, J. Electrophysiological study of the effect of sodium salicylate upon the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol 1973; 98: 297–301.
14. Murugasu, E, Russell, IJ. Salicylate ototoxicity: the effects on basilar membrane displacement, cochlear microphonics, and neural responses in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. Audit Neurosci 1995; 1: 139–150.
15. Dallos, P. Cochlear potentials. In: Eagles, EL, ed. Human Communication and its Disorders. The Nervous System, Vol 3. New York: Raven Press, 1975; 69–80.
16. Robles, L, Ruggero, MA. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 2001; 81: 1305–1352.
17. Goldstein, MH. The auditory periphery. In: Mountcastle, VB, ed. Medical Physiology, Vol 1. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co., 1980; 428–456.
18. Sellick, PM, Russell, IJ. The responses of inner hair cells to basilar membrane velocity during low frequency auditory stimulation in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 1980;2:439–445.
19. Patuzzi, RB. A model of the generation of the cochlear microphonic with nonlinear hair cell transduction and nonlinear basilar membrane mechanics. Hear Res 1987; 30: 73–82.
20. Chertoff, ME, Amani-Taleshi, D, Guo, Y, Burkard, R. The influence of inner hair cell loss on the instantaneous frequency of the cochlear microphonic. Hear Res 2002; 174: 93–100.
21. Russell, I, Schauz, C. Salicylate ototoxicity: effects on the stiffness and electromotility of outer hair cells isolated from the guinea pig cochlea. Audit Neurosci 1995; 1:309–319.
22. Evans, EF, Borerwe, TA. Ototoxic effects of salicylates on the responses of single cochlear nerve fibres and on cochlear potentials. Br J Audiol 1982; 16: 101–108.
23. Muller, M, Klinke, R, Arnold, W, Oestreicher, E. Auditory nerve fibre responses to salicylate revisited. Hear Res 2003; 183: 37–43.
24. Cody, AR, Russell, IJ. The response of hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea-pig cochlea to tones. J Physiol 1987; 383: 551–569.
25. Brown, AM, Kemp, DT. Suppressibility of the 2fl-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 1984; 13: 29–37.
26. Narayan, SS, Temchin, AN, Recio, A, Ruggero, MA. Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae. Science 1998; 282: 1882–1884.
27. Tasaki, I, Davis, H, Legouix, J-P. The space-time pattern of the cochlear microphonics (guinea pig), as recorded by differential electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1952;24:502–519.
28. Liberman, MC, Gao, J, He, DZ, Wu, X, Jia, S, Zuo, J. Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier. Nature 2002; 419: 300–304.
29. Mountain, DC. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Science 1980; 210: 71–72.
30. Collet, L, Kemp, DT, Veuillet, E, Duclaux, R, Moulin, A, Morgon, A. effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 1990; 43: 251–262.
31. Fex, J. Augmentation of cochlear microphonic by stimulation of efferent fibres to the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol 1959; 50: 540–541.
32. Sohmer, H. The effect of contralateral olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation on the cochlear potentials evoked by acoustic stimuli of various frequencies and intensities. Acta Otolaryngol 1965;60: 59–70.
33. Martin, P, Hudspeth, AJ. Active hair-bundle movements can amplify a hair cell's response to oscillatory mechanical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 14306–14311.