What makes a difference: A method to determine whether a change in an image affects the perceived gist

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 399-406

  Van Montfort, Xandra ^a,b  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948824353     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193009     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. BIEDERMAN, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 213-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. FREEMAN, G. H., & HALTON, J. H. (1951). Note on an exact treatment of contingency goodness-of-fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika, 38, 141-149.
3. FRIEDMAN, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
4. GARNER, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
5. HOLLINGWORTH, A., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 113-136.
6. POTTER, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966.
7. RENSINK, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
8. RENSINK, R. A., O'REGAN, J. K., & CLARK, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
9. SIMONS, D. J., & LEVIN, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
10. SIMONS, D. J., & RENSINK, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 16-20.
11. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual memory: What do you know about what you saw? Current Biology, 8, 303-304.