Efficient implementation of nonlinear deconvolution methods for implicit large-eddy simulation

High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering 2006 - Transactions of the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart, HLRS 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 293-306

  Hickel, S ^a   Adams, N A ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECONVOLUTION;

COMPUTATIONAL OPERATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION; IMPLICIT LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS; ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE; LARGE SCALE COMPUTATION; SUB-GRID SCALE MODELS; SYSTEMATIC FRAMEWORK;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

EID: 34848916600     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36183-1_21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. N.A. Adams, S. Hickel, and S. Franz. Implicit subgrid-scale modeling by adaptive deconvolution. J. Comp. Phys., 200:412-431, 2004.
2. J.-P. Chollet. Two-point closures as a subgrid-scale modeling tool for large-eddy simulations. In F. Durst and B.E. Launder, editors, Turbulent Shear Flows IV, pages 62-72, Heidelberg, 1984. Springer.
3. G. Comte-Bellot and S. Corrsin. Simple Eulerian time correlation of full and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated 'isotropic' turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 48:273-337, 1971.
4. E. Garnier, M. Mossi, P. Sagaut, P. Comte, and M. Deville. On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large-eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys., 153:273-311, 1999.
5. S. Ghosal. An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. J. Comput. Phys., 125:187-206, 1996.
6. F.F. Grinstein and C. Fureby. From canonical to complex flows: Recent progress on monotonically integrated LES. Comp. Sci. Eng., 6:36-49, 2004.
7. A. Harten, B. Engquist, S. Osher, and S. Chakravarthy. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comp. Phys., 71:231-303, 1987.
8. S. Hickel, N.A. Adams, and J. A. Domaradzki. An adaptive local deconvolution method for implicit LES. J. Comput. Phys., 213:413-436, 2006.
9. S. Hickel, S. Franz, N.A. Adams, and P. Koumoutsakos. Optimization of an implicit subgrid-scale model for LES. In Proceedings o f the 21st International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw, Poland, 2004.
10. S. Hickel, T. Kempe, and N.A. Adams. On implicit subgrid-scale modeling in wall-bounded flows. In Proceedings of th e EUROMECH Col loquium 469, pages 36-37, Dresden, Germany, 2005.
11. S. Hickel, T. Kempe, and N.A. Adams. Implicit large-eddy simulation applied to turbulent channel flow with periodic constrictions. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics, 2006. (submitted).
12. G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys., 126:202-228, 1996.
13. A. Leonard. Energy cascade in large eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows. Adv. Geophys., 18A:237-248, 1974.
14. M. Lesieur. Turbulence in Fluids. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 3 edition, 1997.
15. R.J. LeVeque. Numerical methods for conservation laws. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1992.
16. S.W. Liu, C. Meneveau, and J. Katz. On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech., 275:83-119, 1994.
17. τ = 590. Phys. Fluids, 11:943-945, 1999.
18. U. Schumann. Subgrid scale model for finite-difference simulations of turbulence in plane channels and annuli. J. Comput. Phys., 18:376-404, 1975.
19. C.-W. Shu. Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Technical Report 97-65, ICASE, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 1997.