Assortative mating and female clutch investment in black grouse

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1399-1403

  Rintamäki, Pekka T ^a   Lundberg, Arne ^a   Alatalo, Rauno V ^b   Höglund, Jacob ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE BEHAVIOR; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

TETRAO TETRIX;

EID: 0032456664     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0904     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahnesjö, I., Vincent, A., Alatalo, R., Halliday, T. & Sutherland, W. J. 1993. The role of females in influencing mating patterns. Behavioral Ecology, 4, 187-189.
2. Alatalo, R. V., Lundberg, A. & Glynn, C. 1986. Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature, 323, 152-153.
3. Alatalo, R. V., Höglund, J. & Lundberg, A. 1988. Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 34, 363-374.
4. Alatalo, R. V., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A. & Sutherland, W. J. 1992. Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 53-59.
5. Alatalo, R. V., Burke, T., Dunn, J., Hanotte, O., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A., Moss, R. & Rintamäki, P. T. 1996. Paternity, copulation disturbance and female choice in lekking black grouse. Animal Behaviour, 52, 861-873.
6. Apollonio, M., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Mari, F. 1989. Correlates of copulatory success in a fallow deer lek. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 89-97.
7. Bradbury, J. W., Vehrencamp, S. L. & Gibson, R. 1985. Leks and the unanimity of female choice. In: Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith (Ed. by P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey & M. Slatkin), pp. 301-314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Burley, N. 1986. Sexual selection for aesthetic traits in species with biparental care. American Naturalist, 127, 415-445.
9. Burley, N. 1988. The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. American Naturalist, 132, 611-628.
10. Choudhury, S. & Black, J. M. 1993. Mate selection behaviour and sampling strategies in geese. Animal Behaviour, 46, 747-757.
11. Cooke, F., Finney, G. H. & Rockwell, R. F. 1976. Assortative mating in lesser snow goose. Behavioral Genetics, 6, 127-140.
12. Dufva, R. & Allander, K. 1996. Variable effects of the hen flea Ceratophyllus gallinae on the breeding success of the great tit Parus major in relation to weather conditions. Ibis, 138, 772-777.
13. Ellegren, H., Gustafsson, L. & Sheldon, B. 1996. Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 93, 11 723-11 728.
14. Fiske, P., Kålås, J. A. & Sæther, S. A. 1994. Correlates of male mating success in the lekking great snipe (Gallinago media): results from a four-year study. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 210-218.
15. Gaines, D. G. & Rice, W. R. 1990. Analysis of biological data when there are ordered expectations. American Naturalist, 137, 310-317.
16. Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. 1991. Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity, and copying. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 165-180.
17. Helminen, M. 1963. Composition of the Finnish populations of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, and black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix, in the autumns of 1952-1961, as revealed by a study of wings. Paper Game Research, 23, 1-124.
18. Hill, W. L. 1991. Correlates of male mating success in the ruff Philomachus pugnax, a lekking shorebird. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 367-372.
19. Hjorth, I. 1970. Reproductive behaviour in Tetraoniidae. Swedish Wildlife (Viltrevy), 7, 190-596.
20. Höglund, J. & Alatalo, R. V. 1995. Leks. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
21. Hovi, M., Alatalo, R. V., Höglund, J., Lundberg, A. & Rintamäki, P. T. 1994. Lek center attracts black grouse females. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 258, 303-305.
22. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, J. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350, 33-38.
23. Koivisto, I. 1965. Behaviour of the black grouse Lyrurus tetrix (L.), during spring display. Finnish Game Research, 26, 5-60.
24. Kruijt, J. P., de Vos, G. J. & Bossema, I. 1972. The arena system of the black grouse. Proceedings of the International Ornithological Congress, 15, 399-423.
25. de Lope, F. & Møller, A. P. 1993. Female reproductive effort depends on the degree of ornamentation of their mates. Evolution, 47, 1152-1160.
26. Møller, A. P. 1992. Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. American Naturalist, 139, 1089-1101.
27. Pan, G. 1996. Subset selection with additional order information. Biometrics, 52, 1363-1374.
28. Petrie, M. 1994. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature, 371, 598-599.
29. Petrie, M. & Williams, A. 1993. Peahens lay more eggs for peacocks with larger trains. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 251, 127-131.
30. Petrie, M., Hall, M., Halliday, T., Budgey, H. & Pierpont, C. 1992. Multiple lekking in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and the same male more than once? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 349-358.
31. Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A. P. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 260, 21-29.
32. Real, L. 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. American Naturalist, 136, 376-405.
33. Real, L. A. 1991. Search theory and mate choice. II. Mutual interaction, assortative mating, and equilibrium variation in male and female fitness. American Naturalist, 138, 901-917.
34. Reynolds, J. D. & Gross, M. R. 1990. Costs and benefits of female choice: is there a lek paradox? American Naturalist, 136, 230-243.
35. Rintamäki, P. T., Alatalo, R. V., Höglund, J. & Lundberg, A. 1995. Mate sampling behaviour of black grouse females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 209-215.
36. Senar, J. C., Burton, P. J. K. & Metcalfe, N. B. 1992. Variation in the nomadic tendency of a wintering finch Carduelis spinus and its relationship with body condition. Ornis Scandinavica, 23, 63-72.
37. Shin, D. W., Park, C. G. & Part, T. 1996. Testing for ordered group effects with repeated measurements. Biometrika, 83, 688-694.
38. Wiley, R. H. 1991. Lekking in birds and mammals: behavioural and evolutionary issues. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 20, 201-291.