Complete graphs and bibliographic coupling: A test of the applicability of bibliographic coupling for the identification of cognitive cores on the field level

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 338-356

  Jarneving, Bo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bibliographic coupling; Research fronts; Science mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848865639     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Analysis and visualization of large networks. Vol. 41, University of Ljublijana, Preprint series, p. 871.
2. Braam R.R., Moed H.F., and van Raan A.J.F. Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. 2. Dynamic aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 4 (1991) 233-251
3. Braam R.R., Moed H.F., and van Raan A.J.F. Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. 2. Dynamic aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 4 (1991) 252-266
4. Biglan A. The difference of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57 3 (1973) 195-203
5. Crane D. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities (1972), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London
6. Everitt B.S., Landau S., and Leese M. Cluster analysis. 4th ed. (2001), Arnold, London
7. Franklin J.J., and Johnston R. Co-citation bibliometric modelling as a tool for S&T and R&D management: Issues, applications, and developments. In: van Raan A.F.J. (Ed). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (1988), North Holland, Amsterdam
8. Glänzel W., and Czerwon H.J. A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. River Forest, IL, June 7-10 (1995) 167-176
9. Glänzel W., and Czerwon H.J. A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics 37 2 (1996) 195-221
10. Griffith B., Small H., Stonehill J., and Dey S. The structure of scientific literatures. II. Toward a macro- and microstructure for science. Science Studies 4 (1974) 339-365
11. Hubert L., and Arabie P. Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification 2 (1985) 193-218
12. Jarneving B. The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research. Scientometrics 50 3 (2001) 365-389
13. Johnsbaugh R. Discrete mathematics. 4th ed. (1997), Prentice Hall International, New Jersey
14. Kaufman L., and Rousseeuw P.J. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey
15. Kessler M.M. An experimental communication center for scientific and technical information (1960), Massachusetts Institute for Technology, Lincoln Laboratory
16. Kessler, M. M. (1962). An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers. Massachusetts Institute for Technology, Lincoln Laboratory.
17. Kessler M.M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation 14 1 (1963) 10-25
18. Kessler M.M. Bibliographic coupling extended in time: Ten case histories. Information Storage and Retrieval 1 (1963) 169-187
19. Kessler M.M. Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing. American Documentation 16 3 (1965) 223-233
20. Martyn J. Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation 20 (1964) 236
21. McCain K.W. Mapping authors in intellectual space-A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 6 (1990) 433-443
22. McCain K.W. Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37 3 (1986) 111-122
23. Miller G.A. A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 6 (1969) 169-191
24. Mubeen M.A. Bibliographic coupling: an empirical study of economics. Annals of Library Science and Documentation 42 2 (1995) 41-53
25. Noyons E.C.M. Bibliometric mapping as a science policy and research management tool (1999), DSWO Press, Leiden
26. Otte E., and Rousseau R. Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 28 6 (2002) 441-453
27. Persson O. The intellectual base and research front of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 1 (1994) 31-38
28. Peters H.P.F., Braam R.R., and van Raan A.F.J. Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46 1 (1995) 9-21
29. Pratt A.D. A measure of class concentration in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28 (1977) 285-292
30. Rand W.M. Objective criteria for the evaluation of cluster methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66 336 (1971) 846-850
31. Rip A. Mapping of science: Possibilities and limitations. In: van Raan A.F.J. (Ed). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (1988), North Holland, Amsterdam
32. Sen S.K., and Gan S.K. A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications. Annals of Library Science and Documentation 30 2 (1983) 78-82
33. Sharabchiev, Y. T. (1988). Comparative analysis of 2 methods of cluster analysis of bibliographic citation. (In Russian). Naucno-techniceskaja informacija/2.
34. Sharada B.A., and Sharma J.S. A study of bibliographic coupling in linguistic research. Annals of Library Science and Documentation 40 4 (1993) 25-137
35. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (1973) 265-269
36. Small H., and Griffith B. The structure of scientific literatures. I. Identifying and graphing specialities. Science Studies 4 1 (1974) 17-40
37. Small H., and Sweeney E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using cocitations. I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics 7 3-6 (1985) 391-409
38. Tijssen R.J.W. Cartography of science: Scientometric mapping with multidimensional methods (1992), DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden
39. Vladutz G., and Cook J. Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness. Proceedings of the ASIS annual meeting 47 (1984) 204-207
40. White H.D., and Griffith B.C. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 (1981) 163-171
41. Yeung, K. Y., Ruzzo, W. L. (2001). Details of adjusted Rand Index and clustering algorithms. Supplement to the paper "An empirical study on principal component analysis for clustering gene expression data". In Technical Report 20000 UW-CSE-00-11-01. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington.