Particle number to volume concentration ratios at two measurement sites in Finland

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Kivekäs, Niku ^a   Kerminen, Veli Matti ^a   Engler, Christa ^a   Lihavainen, Heikki ^a   Komppula, Mika ^a   Viisanen, Yrjö ^a   Kulmala, Markku ^b  

^a FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; FINLAND; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; RAIN; SOLAR RADIATION;

AEROSOL; AIR MASS; AIR TEMPERATURE; ATMOSPHERIC PARTICLE; CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEUS; DATA SET; PARAMETERIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; LAPPI [FINLAND]; NORTHERN EUROPE; PALLAS; SCANDINAVIA; STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN; UTO;

EID: 34848850866     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2006JD007102     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chen, Y, and J. E. Penner (2005), Uncertainty analysis for estimates of the first indirect aerosol effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2935-2948.
2. Dusek, U., D. S. Covert, A. Wiedensohler, C. Neusüβ, and D. Weise (2004), Aerosol number to volume ratios in Southwest Portugal during ACE-2, Tellus, Ser B, 56, 477-491.
3. Glantz, P., K. Noone, and S. R. Osborne (2003), Scavenging efficiencies of acrosol particles in marine stratocumulus and cumulus clouds, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 1329-1350.
4. Hallberg, A., et al. (1994), Phase partitioning of aerosol particles in clouds at Kleiner Feldberg, J. Atmos. Chem., 19, 107-127.
5. Hatakka, J., et al. (2003), Overview of the atmospheric research activities and results at Pallas GAW station, Boreal Environ. Res., 8, 365-384.
6. Hegg, D. A., and H. Jonsson (2000), Aerosol number-to-volume relationship and relative humidity in eastern Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 1987-1995.
7. Hegg, D. A., and L. M. Russell (2000), Analysis of processes determining the number-to-volume relationship for submicron aerosol in the eastern Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15,321-15,328.
8. Henning, S., E. Weingartner, S. Schmid, M. Wendisch, H. W. Gäggeter, and U. Baltensberger (2002), Size-dependent aerosol activation at the high-alpine site Jungfraujoch (3580 m asl), Tellus, Ser. B, 54, 82-95.
9. Hudson, J. G., and X. Da (1996), Volatility and size of cloud condensation nuclei, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 4435-4442.
10. Kaufman, Y. J., D. Tanre, and O. Boucher (2002), A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system, Nature, 419, 215-223.
11. Kerminen, V-M., H. Lihavainen, M. Komppula, Y. Viisanen, and M. Kulmala (2005), Direct observational evidence linking atmospheric aerosol formation and cloud droplet activation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L14803, doi:10.1029/2005GLO23130.
12. Komppula, M., H. Lihavainen, J. Hatakka, J. Paatero, P. Aalto, M. Kulmala, and Y Viisanen (2003), Observations of new particle formation and size distributions at two different heights and surroundings in subarctic area in northern Finland, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D9), 4295, doi:10.1029/2002JD002939.
13. Komppula,M., H. Lihavainen,V.-M. Kerninen, M. Kulmala, and Y. Viisanen (2005), Measurements of cloud droplet activation of aerosol particles at a clean subarctic background site, J. Geophys, Res., 110, D06204, doi: 10. 1029/2004JD005200.
14. Kristjansson, J, E., T. Iversen, A. Kirkevåg, O. Seland, and J. Debernard (2005), Response of the climate system to aerosol direct and indirect forcing: Role of cloud feedbacks, J Geophys. Res., 110, D24206, doi: 10. 1029/2005JD006299.
15. Lohmann, U., and J. Feichter (2005), Global indirect aerosol effects: A review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715-737.
16. Menon, S., et al. (2003), Evaluating aerosol/cloud/radiation process parameterizations with single-column models and Second Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-2) cloudy column observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D24), 4762, doi:10.1029/2003JD003902.
17. Nenes, A., and S. Seinfeld (2003), Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D14), 4415, doi: 10. 1029/2002JD002911.
18. Ovtchinnikov, M., and S. J. Ghan (2005), Parallel simulations of aerosol influence on clouds using cloud-resolving and single-column models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D15S10, doi:10.1029/2004JD005088.
19. Ramanathan, V, P. J. Crutzen, J. T. Kiehl, and D. Rosenfeld (2001), Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle, Science, 294, 2119-2124.
20. Satheesh, S. K., and K. K. Moorthy (2005), Radiative effects of natural aerosols: A review, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2089-2110.
21. Tunved, P., H.-C. Hansson, V.-M. Kerminen, J. Ström, M. Dal Maso, H. Lihavainen, Y. Viisanen, P. P. Aalto, M. Komppula, and M. Kulmala (2006), High natural aerosol loading over boreal forests, Science, 312, 261-263.
22. Twohy, C. H., J. G. Hudson, S.-S. Yum, J. R. Andersson, S. K. Durlak, and D. Baumgardner (2001), Characteristics of cloud-nucleating aerosols in the Indian Ocean region, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28,699-28,710.
23. Van Dingenen, R., F. Raes, J.-P. Putaud, A. Virkkula, and M. Mangoni (1999), Processes determining the relationship between aerosol number and non-sea-salt mass concentrations in the clean and perturbed marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 8027-8038.
24. Van Dingenen, R., A. 0. Virkkula, F. Raes, T. S. Bates, and A. Wiedensohler (2000), A simple non-linear analytical relationship between aerosol accumulation number and sub-micron volume, explaining their observed ratio in the clean and polluted marine boundary layer, Tellus, Ser B, 52, 439-451.