Climate and pH as determinants of vegetation succession in Central European man-made habitats

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 701-710

  Prach, Karel ^a,b   Pyšek, Petr ^b,c   Jarošik, Vojtech ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Ordination; Soil property; Species number; Succession rate; Vascular plant

Indexed keywords

ACID SOIL; CLIMATE EFFECT; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; PH; SOIL PROPERTY; SUCCESSION; VASCULAR PLANT; VEGETATION COVER; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; CZECH REPUBLIC; EURASIA; EUROPE;

SERES; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 34848835727     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2007)18[701:CAPADO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anon. 2005. SPSS Version 13. SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, US.
2. Bazzaz, FA. 1996. Plants in changing environments. Linking physiological, population, and community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. Box, E.O. 1981. Macroclimate and plant forms. Junk, The Hague, NL.
4. Burrows, C.J. 1990. Processes of vegetation change. Unwyn Hyman, London, UK.
5. Christensen, N.L. & Peet, R.K. 1981. Convergence during secondary forest succession. J. Ecol. 72: 25-36.
6. Cook, R.D. 1977. Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19: 15-18.
7. Crawley, M.J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
8. Crawley, M.J. 2002. Statistical computing. An introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
9. del Moral, R. & Ellis, E.E. 2004. Gradients in compositional variation on lahars, Mount St. Helens, Washington, USA. Plant Ecol. 175: 273-286.
10. Dovčiak, M., Frelich, L.E. & Reich, P.B. 2005. Pathways in old-field succession to white pine: seed rain, shade, and climate effects. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 363-378.
11. Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W. & Paulißen, D. 1991. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mittel-europa. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1-248.
13. Francis, B., Green, M. & Payne, C. (eds.) 1994. The GLIM system. Release 4 manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Gilchrist, R. & Green, P. 1994. The theory of generalized linear models. In: Francis, B., Green, M. & Payne, C. (eds.) The GLIM system. Release 4 manual, pp. 259-305. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Glenn-Lewin, D.C., Peet, R.K. & Veblen, T.T. 1992. Plant succession. Theory and prediction. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
16. Grime, J.P. 2001. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. 2nd ed. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
17. Hodačová, D. & Prach, K. 2003. Spoil heaps from brown coal mining: technical reclamation vs. spontaneous re-vegetation. Rester. Ecol. 11: 385-391.
18. Jarošík, V. & Dixon, A.F.G. 1999. Population dynamics of a tree-dwelling aphid: regulation and density independent processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 726-732.
19. Jarošík, V, Honek, A. & Dixon, A.F.G. 2002. Developmental rate isomorphy in insects and mites. Am. Nat. 160: 497-510.
20. Moravec, D. & Votýka, J. 1997. Climatic regions of the Czech Republic. Karolinum, Praha, CZ. [In Czech.]
21. Osbornová;, J., Kovářová, M., Lepš, J. & Prach, K. (eds.) 1990. Succession in abandoned fields. Studies in Central Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL.
22. Otto, R., Krüsi, B.O., Burga, C.A., Fernández-Palacios, J.M. 2006. Old-field succession along a precipitation gradient in the semi-arid coastal region of Tenerife. J. Arid Environ. 65: 156-178.
23. Pickett, S.T.A. 1989. Space-for-time substitution as an alternative to long-term studies. In: Likens, G.E. (ed.) Long-term studies in ecology: Approaches and alternatives, pp. 110-135. Springer, Stuttgart, DE.
24. Prach, K. 1987. Succession of vegetation on dumps from strip coal mining, N.W.Bohemia, Czechoslovakia. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 22: 339-354.
25. Prach, K. & Pyšek, P. 1994. Spontaneous establishment of woody plants in Central European derelict sites and their potential for reclamation. Restor. Ecol. 3: 190-197.
26. Prach, K. & Pyšek, P. 1999. How do species dominating in succession differ from others? J. Veg. Sci. 10: 383-392.
27. Prach, K. & Řehounková, K. 2006. Vegetation succession over broad geographical scales: which factors determine the patterns? Preslia 78: 469-480.
28. Prach, K., Pyšek, P. & Šmilauer, P. 1993. On the rate of succession. Oikos 66: 343-346.
29. Prach, K., Pyšek, P. & Šmilauer, P. 1997. Changes in species traits during succession: A search for pattern. Oikos 79: 201-205.
30. Prach, K., Pyšek, P. & Bastl, M. 2001. Spontaneous vegetation succession in human-disturbed habitats: a pattern across seres. Appl. Veg. Sci. 4: 83-88.
31. Prach, K., Marrs, R., Pyšek, P. & van Diggelen, R. 2007. Manipulation of succession. In: Walker, L.R. & Hobbs, R. J. (eds.) Ecological succession and restoration: Knowledge and practice, p. 121-149, Springer Verlag, New York, NY, US.
32. Pyšek, A. 1978. Ruderal vegetation of the City of Plzeň. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice u Prahy, CZ. [In Czech.]
33. Pyšek, P. 1992. Dominant species exchange during succession in reclaimed habitats: a case study from areas deforested due to air pollution. For. Ecol. Manage. 54: 27-44.
34. Pyšek, P., Jarošík, V., Chytrý, M., Kropáč, Z., Tichý, L. & Wild, J. 2005. Alien plants in temperate weed communities on arable land: prehistoric and recent invaders differ in habitat affinities. Ecology 86: 772-785.
35. Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36. Rawlings, J.O., Pantula, S.G. & Dickey, D.A. 1998. Applied regression analysis: A research tool. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, NY, US.
37. Settele, J., Margules, C., Poschlod, P. & Henle, K. (eds.) 1996. Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluwer, Dordrecht, NL.
38. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd ed. Freeman, New York, NY, US.
39. Stevenson, F.J. & Cole, M.A. 1999. Cycles of soil. Wiley, New York, NY, US.
40. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. 1998. CANOCO Release 4. Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Cannonical Community Ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, US.
41. Ury, H.K. 1976. A comparison of four procedures for multiple comparisons among means (pairwise contrasts) for arbitrary sample sizes. Technometrics 18: 89-97.
42. Tilman, D. 1988. Plant strategies and the structure and dynamics of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, US.
43. Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. 1964-1980. Flora Europaea. Vols. 1-5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. van Andel, J., Bakker, J.P.B. & Grootjans, A.P. 1993. Mechanisms of vegetation succession: A review of concepts and perspectives. Acta Bot. Neerl. 42: 413-433.
45. Walker, L.R. & del Moral, R. 2003. Primary succession and ecosystem rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
46. Wilson, S.D. & Tilman, D. 2002. Quadratic variation in old-field species richness along gradients of disturbance and nitrogen. Ecology 83: 492-504.