The majority of bold statements expressed during grand rounds lack scientific merit

Medical Education

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 965-967

  Linthorst, Gabor E ^a   Daniels, Johannes M A ^a   Van Westerloo, David J ^a  

^a ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attitude of health personnel; Clinical competence *standards; Internship and residency *standards; Teaching *methods standards

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICAL STAFF; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; NETHERLANDS; TEACHING;

EID: 34848818530     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02838.x     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Martin M. Grand rounds: what is the point? J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005 27 : 511 4.
2. Myint PK, Sabanathan K. Role of grand rounds in the education of hospital doctors. Hosp Med 2005 66 : 297 9.
3. Goldstein EA, Maestas RR, Fryer-Edwards K et al. Professionalism in medical education: an institutional challenge. Acad Med 2006 81 : 871 6.