Orientational effect of aryl groups in aryl selenides: How can 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts clarify the effect?

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 72, Issue 20, 2007, Pages 7587-7596

  Hayashi, Satoko ^a   Yamane, Kentaro ^a   Nakanishi, Waro ^a  

^a WAKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL SHIFT; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANTS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; SOLUTIONS;

ARYL GROUPS; QUANTUM CHEMICAL CALCULATIONS;

SELENIUM COMPOUNDS;

ANTHRAQUINONE DERIVATIVE; CHLOROFORM; NAPHTHALENE; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON DERIVATIVE; SELENIDE;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ENERGY; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 34848817967     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo070988g     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Organic Selenium Compounds: Their Chemistry and Biology; Klayman, D. L., Günther, W. H. H., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1973.
2. The Chemistry of Organic Selenium and Tellurium Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; John-Wiley and Sons: New York, 1986; Vols. 1 and 2.
3. Organic Selenium Chemistry; Liotta, D., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1987.
4. Organoselenium Chemistry, A practical Approach; Back, T. G., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999.
5. Organoselenium Chemistry Modern Developments in Organic Synthesis, Top. Curr. Chem.; Wirth, T., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo, 2000; Vol. 208.
6. (a) MacFarlane, W.; Wood, R. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1972, 13, 1397-1401.
7. (b) Iwamura, H.; Nakanishi, W. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 1981, 39, 795-804.
8. (c) The Chemistry of Organic Selenium and Tellurium Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; John-Wiley and Sons: New York, 1986; Vol. 1, Chapter 6.
9. 77Se NMR Chemical Shifts; Klapotke, T. M., Broschag, M., Eds; Wiley: New York, 1996.
10. (e) Duddeck, H. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1995, 27, 1-323.
11. (a) Kalabin, G. A.; Kushnarev, D. F.; Bzesovsky, V. M.; Tschmutova, G. A. J. Org. Mag. Res. 1979, 12, 598-604.
12. (b) Kalabin, G. A.; Kushnarev, D. F.; Mannafov, T. G. Zh. Org. Khim. 1980, 16, 505-512.
13. (c) Mullen, G. P.; Luthra, N. P.; Dunlap, R. B.; Odom, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 811-816.
14. (d) Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S.; Uehara, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 3933-3943.
15. (a) Hayashi, S.; Nakanishi, W. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6688-6696.
16. (b) Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S.; Yamaguchi, H. Chem. Lett. 1996, 947-948.
17. (c) Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S.; Sakaue, A.; Ono, G.; Kawada, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3635-3640.
18. (d) Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 38-48.
19. (a) Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S. Chem. Lett. 1998, 523-524.
20. (b) Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 6074-6081.
21. Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S.; Shimizu, D.; Hada, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3829-3846;
22. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 5282-5293.
23. Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S.; Uehara, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 9906-9912.
24. 22
25. The importance of relative conformations in the substituent effects between substituents and probe sites is pointed out. See, for example: Bordwen, K.; Grubbs, E. J. Angular Dependence of Dipolar Substituent Effects. In Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry; Taft, R. W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1993; Vol. 19, pp 183-224. See also refs cited therein.
26. 2. See: Topsom, R. D. The Nature and Analysis of Substituent Electronic Effects. In Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry; Taft, R. W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons; New York, 1976; Vol. 12, pp 1-20.
27. 3 solutions were used for NMR measurements. The concentrations would be lower for the compounds of low solubility, such as 1j and 2j, especially at 213 K. However, the concentration dependence of δ(H) and δ(C) of 1 and 2 is usually small when they are less than 0.050 M.
28. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
29. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
30. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
31. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 03, revision D.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
32. Glendening, E. D.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Weinhold, F. NBO, version 3.1.
33. The deviation of the data for Y = a is often observed in such plots; however, the reason is not clear.
34. SCS, which must be responsible for the poor correlation.
35. SCS is also analyzed as two correlations: y = 1.300x -7.538 (r = 0.9999) for Y = b, c, and e, and y = 0.901x -3.831 (r = 0.999) for Y = d, f-j, although data for Y = a deviate the line.
36. Foresman, J. B.; Keith, T. A.; Wiberg, K. B.; Snoonian, J.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16098-16104.
37. Nakanishi, W.; Hayashi, S.; Itoh, N. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1676-1684.
38. Adams, R.; Binder, L. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 2773-2776.
39. The contribution of relativistic terms has been pointed out for heavier atoms, but the perturbation would be small for the selenium nucleus. See: Fukuda, R.; Hada, M.; Nakatsuji, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 1015-1026.
40. Fukuda, R.; Hada, M.; Nakatsuji, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 1027-1035.
41. Tanaka, S.; Sugimoto, M.; Takashima, H.; Hada, M.; Nakatsuji, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 953-959.
42. Ballard, C. C.; Hada, M.; Kaneko, H.; Nakatsuji, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 254, 170-178.
43. Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Kaneko, H.; Ballard, C. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 255, 195-202.
44. Hada, M.; Kaneko, H.; Nakatsuji, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 261, 7-12.