Structure of 1-(arylselanyl)naphthalenes - Y dependence in 1-(p-YC6H4SE)C10H7

European Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn , Issue 20, 2001, Pages 3933-3943

  Nakanishi, Warô ^a   Hayashi, Satoko ^a   Uehara, Tetsutaro ^a  

^a WAKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biaryl compounds; Selenium; Substituent effects; Through bond interactions

Indexed keywords

1 (SELANYL)NAPHTHALENE DERIVATIVE; 1,8 BIS(CHALCOGENO)NAPHTHALENE DERIVATIVE; BENZENE DERIVATIVE; CARBON; CHLOROFORM; NAPHTHALENE DERIVATIVE; SELENIUM DERIVATIVE; SOLVENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ELECTRON; ENERGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHASE TRANSITION; SOLID STATE; TECHNIQUE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

EID: 0034780590     PISSN: 1434193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0690(200110)2001:20<3933::AID-EJOC3933>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. [1a] Organic Sulfur Chemistry: Theoretical and Experimental Advances (Eds.: F. Bernardi, I. G. Csizmadia, A. Mangini), Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam, 1985.
2. [1b] The Chemistry of Organic Selenium and Tellurium Compounds (Eds.: S. Patai, Z. Rappoport), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986, vol. 1.
3. [1c] The Chemistry of Organic Selenium and Tellurium Compounds (Ed.: S. Patai), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986, vol. 2.
4. [1d] Organic Chemistry of Sulfur (Ed.: S. Oae), Plenum Press, New York, 1977.
5. [1e] Organic Selenium Compounds: Their Chemistry and Biology (Eds.: D. L. Klayman, W. H. H. Günther), Wiley, New York, 1973.
6. [1f] Organic Selenium Chemistry (Ed.: D. Liotta), Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1987.
7. [1g] M. R. Detty, M. B. O'Regan, Tellurium-Containing Heterocycles; Wiley, New York, 1994.
8. [1h] The Chemistry of the Ether Linkage (Ed.: S. Patai), Wiley, New York, 1967.
9. [1i] The Chemistry of the Thiol Group (Ed.: S. Patai), Wiley, New York, 1974, part 1 and 2.
10. [1j] The Chemistry of Ethers, Crown Ethers, Hydroxy Groups and Their Sulfur Analogues (Ed.: S. Patai), Wiley, New York, 1980, part 1 and 2, suppl. E.
11. [1k] The Organic Chemistry of Tellurium (Ed.: K. J. Irgolic), Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1974.
12. [1l] Organoselenium Chemistry, A practical Approach (Ed.: T. G. Back), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
13. [2a] R. S. Glass, S. W. Andruski, J. L. Broeker, Rev. Heteroatom Chem. 1988, 1, 31.
14. [2b] R. S. Glass, S. W. Andruski, J. L. Broeker, H. Firouzabadi, L. K. Steffen, G. S. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4036.
15. [2c] R. S. Glass, L. Adamowicz, J. L. Broeker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1065.
16. [3a] H. Fujihara, H. Ishitani, Y. Takaguchi, N. Furukawa, Chem. Lett. 1995, 571.
17. [3b] H. Fujihara, M. Yabe, J.-J. Chiu, N. Furukawa, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4345.
18. [3c] N. Furukawa, T. Fujii, T. Kimura, H. Fujihara, Chem. Lett. 1994, 1007.
19. [3d] H. Fujihara, R. Saito, M. Yabe, N. Furukawa, Chem. Lett. 1992, 1437.
20. [4a] W. Nakanishi, Chem. Lett. 1993, 2121.
21. [4b] W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, S. Toyota, Chem. Commun. 1996, 371.
22. [4c] W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, H. Yamaguchi, Chem. Lett. 1996, 947.
23. [4d] W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, A. Sakaue, G. Ono, Y. Kawada, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3635.
24. [4e] W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, S. Toyota, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8790.
25. [4f] S. Hayashi, W. Nakanishi, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 6688.
26. [4g] W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, T. Uehara, J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 9906.
27. [5a] M. Iwaoka, S. Tomoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4463.
28. [5b] M. Iwaoka, S. Tomoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8077.
29. [5c] M. Iwaoka, H. Komatsu, S. Tomoda, Chem. Lett. 1998, 581.
30. [5d] H. Komatsu, M. Iwaoka, S. Tomoda, Chem. Commun. 1999, 205.
31. [6a] K.-D. Asmus, Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 436.
32. [6b] W. K. Musker, Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 200.
33. [6c] H. Fujihara, N. Furukawa, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 1989, 186, 261.
34. [7a] F. B. Mallory, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7747.
35. [7b] F. B. Mallory, C. W. Mallory, M.-C. Fedarko, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3536.
36. [7c] F. B. Mallory, C. W. Mallory, W. M. Ricker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 4770.
37. [7d] F. B. Mallory, C. W. Mallory, W. M. Ricker, J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 457.
38. [7e] F. B. Mallory, C. W. Mallory, M. B. Baker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2577.
39. [7f] L. Ernst, K. Ibrom, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1881.
40. [7g] L. Ernst, K. Ibrom, K. Marat, R. H. Mitchell, G. J. Bodwell, G. W. Bushnell, Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 1119.
41. [8a] F. B. Malory, E. D. Luzik, Jr., C. W. Mallory, P. J. Carroll, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 366.
42. [8b] F. B. Mallory, C. W. Mallory, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4816.
43. [9a] I. Johannsen, H. Eggert, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1240.
44. [9b] I. Johannsen, H. Eggert, S. Gronowitz, A.-B. Hörnfeldt, Chem. Scr. 1987, 27, 359.
45. [9c] H. Fujihara, H. Mima, T. Erata, N. Furukawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3117.
46. [10a] G. Gafner, F. H. Herbstein, Acta. Cryst. 1962, 15, 1081.
47. [10b] M. A. Davydova, Yu. T. Struchkow, Zh. Strukt. Kim. 1962, 3, 184.
48. [10c] M. A. Davydova, Yu. T. Struchkow, Zh. Strukt. Kim. 1968, 9, 1968.
49. [10d] H. Bock, M. Sievert, Z. Havlas, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 677.
50. [10e] R. D. Jackson, S. James, A. G. Orpen, P. G. Pringle, J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 458, C3.
51. For X-ray crystallographic study of 1-(oxy)naphthalene: [11a] W. B. Schweizer, G. Procter, M. Kaftory, D. Dunitz, Helv. Chim. Acta. 1978, 61, 2783.
52. [11b] G. Procter, D. Britton, D. Dunitz, Helv. Chim. Acta. 1981, 64, 471.
53. W. R. Blackmore, S. C. Abrahams, Acta Crystallogr. 1955, 8, 323.
54. [14]
55. The type B structure is established for all members of 8 and 9. We called the change in the structures of 1d-1g from type A to type B in 8d-8g and 9d-9g as G dependence. In such cases, the plot of δ(Se) of 9 versus those of 8 gave an excellent correlation [Equation (a)]. However, the plot of δ(Se) of 1 versus those of 8 must be analyzed as two correlations [Equations (b) and (c)], which strongly suggests that the structure for g(m) is different from that for g(n) in 1. δ(Se) of 9 = 0.898 × δ(Se) of 8 + 40.14 r = 0.999 (n = 7) (a) δ(Se) of 1 = 0.463 × δ(Se) of 8 + 147.95 r = 0.994 for g(m) (b) δ(Se) of 1 = 0.941 × δ(Se) of 8 - 68.02 r = 0.999 for g(n) (c)
56. [4f]
57. [15b] Although the plot of δ(Se) of 2 versus those of 1 gives a rather poor correlation, as shown in Equation (d), the correlation becomes excellent if the points corresponding to Y = OMe and Me are omitted [Equation (e)].
58. [4f] δ(Se) of 1 = 0.686 × δ(Se) of 2 + 71.6 r = 0.979 (n = 7) (d) δ(Se) of 1 = 0.825 × δ(Se) of 2 + 11.1 r = 0.999 (n = 5) (e)
59. [16a] W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 6074.
60. [16b] See also: G. Montaudo, P. Finocchirdo, S. Caccamese, J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 170.
61. [17a] The effect is accelerated by the buttressing effect of the phenyl ring without the Se atom in the naphthalene ring if 1 is compared with 10.
62. [17b] For the buttressing effect, see: M. Aoki, M. Nakamura, M. Oki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 2512.
63. [17c] G. Yamamoto, M. Suzuki, M. Oki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1983, 56, 809.
64. [17d] R. N. Armstrong, H. L. Ammon, J. N. Darnow, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2077.
65. [17e] M. Decouzon, P. Ertl, O. Exner, J. F. Gal, P. C. Maria, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12071.
66. [17f] C. D. Braddock, S. C. Tucker, J. M. Brown, Bull. Chem. Chim. Fr. 1997, 134, 399.
67. 5Y - 82.3 r = 0.995 (f)
68. The correlations for the plots of δ(2-H) and δ(8-H) versus δ(Se) in 1 classified by g(m) and g(n) are as follows. δ(2-H) of 1 = 0.0364 × δ(Se) of 1 - 5.357 r = 0.944 for g(m) (g) δ(2-H) of 1 = 0.0057 × δ(Se) of 1 + 5.739 r = 0.958 for g(n) (h) δ(8-H) of 1 = 0.0081 × δ(Se) of 1 + 5.420 r = 0.933 for g(m) (i) δ(8-H) of 1 = -0.0023 × δ(Se) of 1 + 9.114 r = 0.981 for g(n) (j)
69. [20a] S. G Lias, J. E. Bartmess, J. L. Holmes, R. D. Levin, J. F. Liebman, W. G. Mallard, ("Gas-Phase Ion and Newtral Thermochemistry"), J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1988, 1 17, suppl.
70. [20b] K. D. Jordan, P. D. Burrow, Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 341.
71. [20c] K. D. Jordan, P. D. Burrow, Chem. Res. 1987, 87, 557.
72. A good correlation between the EA and ε(LUMO) at the DFT level is suggested: Chemical Hardness (Ed.: R. G. Pearson), Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997, p. 38.
73. [20] and its ε(LUMO) and ε(LUMO+1) are evaluated to be -0.75 and -2.02 eV, respectively, by the same method. If the data of anthracene are added to the plot, the EA of naphthalene is estimated to be -0.185 eV. The estimated value becomes -0.065 eV if only the data of benzene, naphthalene, and anthracene are used.
74. [23a] R. E. Rosenfield, Jr., R. Parthasarathy, J. D. Dunitz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 4860.
75. [23b] N. Ramasubbu, R. Parthasarathy, Phosphorus Sulfur 1987, 31, 221.
76. The type A-type B pairing is equal to the type I-type II pairing, which is stabilized through the electron donor-acceptor interaction. The type C structure around the two chalcogen atoms must be equal to the type III pairing, of which 0 values at both sites should be almost the same.
77. [20] that of ethane would be substantially smaller than this value. The results show that the ability of a C-H bond as a donor and an acceptor must be very small.
78. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez, J. A. Pople, Gaussian 94, Revision D.4, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1995.
79. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, A. G. Baboul, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian 98, Revision A.9, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
80. 2 symmetry in the selenol.
81. -1).
82. J. B. Foresman, T. A. Keith, K. B. Wiberg, J. Snoonian, M. J. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16098.
83. 2 symmetry than the calculated one. W. Nakanishi, S. Hayashi, unpublished results. (Chemical Equation Presented)
84. 2) in solutions than those predicted by the MO calculations given in Table 8.
85. We should comment on the type B structure of 7b. One might realize that the type B structure of 7b needs no assistance of F at the 8-position, since the structure of 1b is also demonstrated to be type B. Details will be reported in a forthcoming paper.
86. P. T. Beurskens, G. Admiraal, G. Beurskens, W. P. Bosman, S. Garcia-Granda, R. O. Gould, J. M. M. Smits, C. Smykalla, The DIRDIF program system, Technical Report of the Crystallography Laboratory, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1992.
87. P. T. Beurskens, G. Admiraal, G. Beurskens, W. P. Bosman, R. de Gelder, R. Israel, J. M. M. Smits, The DIRDIF-94 program system, Technical Report of the Crystallography Laboratory, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1994.
88. 13C NMR Spectroscopy: Methods and Applications in Organic Chemistry (Eds.: E. Breitmare, W. Voelter), 2nd ed., Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1978.