Project management and software development processes: Integrating RUP and PMBOK

2007 International Conference on Systems Engineering and Modeling, ICSEM '07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-8

  Callegari, Daniel Antonio ^a   Bastos, Ricardo Melo ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

PRODUCT QUALITY;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34748915715     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSEM.2007.373327     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. IEEE Standard for Software Quality Assurance Plans, IEEE, 1989.
2. ISO/IEC 12207. Information Technology - software life cycle, International Standard Organization, 1995.
3. Paulk, M.C.; Curtiss, B.; Chrissis, M.B.; Weber, C.V. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1, Pittsburgh, Software Engineering Institute, 1993.
4. Ahern, D. M., Clouse, A, Turner, R. CMMI Distilled: A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement, Addison-Wesley, 2001.
5. Chrissis, M. B., Konrad, M, Shrum, S. CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement, Addison-Wesley, 2003
6. Duncan, W. R. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, USA, 1996.
7. Schwalbe, K. Information Technology Project Management, 2nd Ed., Thomson Learning, Canada, 2002.
8. Charbonneau, S., Software Project Management - A Mapping between RUP and the PMBOK. Available at http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/ 4721.html, 2004.
9. Cottrell, W., Standards, compliance, and Rational Unified Process, Part I: Integrating RUP and the PMBOK. Available at http://www-128.ibm.com/ developerworks/rational/library/4763.html, 2004.
10. Berki, E., Georgiadou, E., and Holcombe, M. Requirements Engineering and Process Modelling in Software Quality Management - Towards a Generic Process Metamodel. Software Quality Journal, Vol.12, No.3, 2004.
11. Sjoberg, D., Hannay, J., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V., Karahasanovic, A., Liborg, N., and Rekdal, A. A Survey of Controlled Experiments in Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, Vol.31, No.9, Sep. 2005.
12. Henderson-Sellers, B., Dué, R., Graham, I. and Collins, G., 2000, Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective, Procs. ASPEC 2000, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2000.
13. Henderson-Sellers, B., Collins, G. and Graham, I. UML-compatible processes, Proc. HICSS 2001, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2001.
14. Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C. A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard. Information and Software Technology, vol. 47, issue 1, January 2005.
15. Kruchten, P., The Rational Unified Process. An Introduction, Addison Wesley Longman Inc., Reading, MA, USA, 1999.
16. PEP - A RUP Adoption Process. Rational Process Engineering Process, Rational Unified Process, Beta Version 2003.06.01.06, 2003.
17. Scacchi, W. Understanding Software Process Redesign, Analysis and Simulation. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 5: 183-195, 2000.
18. Lee, B., Miller, J. Multi-Project Management in Software Engineering Using Simulation Modelling. Software Quality Journal. Volume 12, Number 1, 2004.
19. SWEBOK. Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
20. Gruhn, V. Process-Centered Software Engineering Environments, A Brief History and Future Challenges. Software Engineering, Vol. 14, 1-4, Dec. 2002, pp. 363-382.
21. SPEM - Software Process Engineering Metamodel, version 1.1, Object Mgmt. Group, Doc. 05-01-06, Jan. 2005.