Evaluation of morphological issues of central nervous system glioblastoma on chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane

Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 173-178

  Tereseviciute N ^a   Tamasauskas A ^a   Valanciute A ^a   Deltuva, V ^a   Graf Von Keyserlingk, D ^a  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Chicken embryo; Chorioallantoic membrane; Glioblastoma

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMOR; CHICK EMBRYO; CHORIOALLANTOIS; GLIOBLASTOMA; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); PATHOLOGY; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEOPLASMS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE; GLIOBLASTOMA; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

AVES; MUS MUSCULUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 34748910766     PISSN: 15051773     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abrey EL, Mason PW (2003) Gliomas. In: Abrey EL, Mason PW (ed.) Brain Tumors. Health Press Limited, Oxford, pp 56-65.
2. Cretu A Fotos JS, Little BW, Galileo DS (2005) Human and rat glioma growth, invasion, and vascularisation in a novel chick embryo brain tumor model. Clin Exp Metastasis 22: 225-236.
3. Dai C, Holland EC (2001) Glioma models. Biochim Biophys Acta 1551: 19-27.
4. Do-Hyun N, Kwan P, Yeon S, Jong-Hyun K (2004) Expression of VEGF and brain specific angiogenesis inhibitor-1 in glioblastoma: prognostic significance. Oncol Rep 11: 863-869.
5. Gabriella M, Materazzi G, Cox VJ, Menghi G (2001) Specialised cell types in the chorioallantoic membrane express carbonic anhydrase during chick embryogenesis. J Anat 198: 229-238.
6. Hagedorn M, Javerzat S, Gilges D, Meyre A, Lafarge B, Eichmann A, Bikfalvi A (2005) Accessing key steps of human tumor progression in vivo by using an avian embryo model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 1643-1648.
7. Hilton DA, Penney M, Pobereskin L, Sanders H, Love S (2004) Histological indicators of prognosis in glioblastomas: retinoblastoma protein expression and oligodendroglial differentiation indicate improved survival. Histopathology 44: 555-560.
8. Kunzi-Rapp K, Kaskel P, Steiner R, Peter UR, Krahn G (2001) Increased blood levels of human S100 melanoma chick embryo xenografts circulation. Pigment Cell Res 14: 9-13.
9. Lafuente JV, Alkiza K, Garibi JM, Alvarez A, Bilbao J, Figols J, Cruz-Sanchez FF (2000) Biologic parameters that correlate with the prognosis of human gliomas. Neuropathology 20: 176-183.
10. Laurin T, Smitz U, Riediger D, Frank HG, Stoll C (2004) Chorioallantoic membrane of fertilized avian eggs as a substrate for assessment of cancerous invasiveness. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 8: 223-228.
11. Liang Y, Diehn M, Watson N, Bollen AW, Aldape KD, Nicholas KM, Lamborn KR, Berger MS, Botstein D, Brown PO, Israel MA (2005) Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 5814-5819.
12. Ohgaki H (2005) Genetic pathways to glioblastomas. Neuropathology 25: 1-7.
13. Papaoutsi M, Sleeman JP, Wilting J (2001) Interaction of rat tumor cells with blood vessels and lymphatics of the avian chorioallantoic membrane. Microsc Res Tech 55: 100-107.
14. Ribatti D (2004) The first evidence of the tumor-induced angiogenesis in vivo by using the chorioallantoic membrane assay dated 1913. Leukemia 18: 1350-1351.
15. Ribatti D, De Falco G, Nico B, Ria R, Crivellato E, Vacca A (2003) In vivo time course of the angiogenic response induced by multiple myeloma plasma cells in the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. J Anat 203: 323-329.
16. Richardson M, Wong D, Lacroix S (2005) Inhibition by doxycycline of angiogenesis in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56: 1-9.
17. Shoin K, Yamashita J, Enkaku F, Sasaki T, Tanaka M, Endo Y (1991) Chick embryo assay as chemosensitivity test for malignant glioma. Jpn J Cancer Res 82: 1165-1170.
18. Singh Y (2004) Tumor Angiogenesis: Clinical Implications. Nepal Journal of Neuroscience 1: 61-63.
19. Staton CA, Stribbling SM, Tazzyman S, Hughes R, Brown JN, Lewis CE (2004) Current methods for assaying angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Int J Exp Path 85: 233-248.
20. Stern CD (2005) The chick; a great model system becomes even greater. Dev Cell 8: 9-17.