Object-extraction and question-parsing using CCG

Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2004 - A meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL held in conjunction with ACL 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 111-118

  Clark, Stephen ^a   Steedman, Mark ^a   Curran, James R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; FORMAL LANGUAGES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COMBINATORY CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR; LABELED DATA; LEXICAL CATEGORIES; NOVEL TECHNIQUES; OBJECT EXTRACTION; PERFORMANCE; QUESTION ANSWERING; STATISTICAL PARSER;

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS;

EID: 34748901333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Srinivas Bangalore and Aravind Joshi. 1999. Supertagging: An approach to almost parsing. Computational Linguistics, 25(2):237-265.
2. Johan Bos, Stephen Clark, Mark Steedman, James R. Curran, and Julia Hockenmaier. 2004. Wide-coverage semantic representations from a CCG parser. In Proceedings of COLING-04, Geneva, Switzerland.
3. Ted Briscoe and John Carroll. 2002. Robust accurate statistical annotation of general text. In Proceedings of the 3rd LREC Conference, pages 1499-1504, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.
4. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st Meeting of the NAACL, pages 132-139, Seattle, WA.
5. Stephen Clark and James R. Curran. 2004a. The importance of supertagging for wide-coverage CCG parsing. In Proceedings of COLING-04, Geneva, Switzerland.
6. Stephen Clark and James R. Curran. 2004b. Parsing the WSJ using CCG and log-linear models. In Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the ACL, Barcelona, Spain.
7. Stephen Clark, Julia Hockenmaier, and Mark Steedman. 2002. Building deep dependency structures with a wide-coverage CCG parser. In Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the ACL, pages 327-334, Philadelphia, PA.
8. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
9. Peter Dienes and Amit Dubey. 2003. Deep syntactic processing by combining shallow methods. In Proceedings of the EMNLP Conference, pages 431-438, Sapporo, Japan.
10. C. Doran, B. Hockey, P. Hopely, J. Rosenzweig, A. Sarkar, B. Srinivas, F. Xia, A. Nasr, and O. Ram-bow. 1997. Maintaining the forest and burning out the underbrush in XTAG. In Proceedings of the ENVGRAM Workshop, Madrid, Spain.
11. Julia Hockenmaier and Mark Steedman. 2002. Generative models for statistical parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar. In Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the ACL, pages 335-342, Philadelphia, PA.
12. Julia Hockenmaier. 2003a. Data and Models for Statistical Parsing with Combinatory Categorial Grammar. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
13. Julia Hockenmaier. 2003b. Parsing with generative models of predicate-argument structure. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the ACL, pages 359-366, Sapporo, Japan.
14. Mark Johnson. 2002. A simple pattern-matching algorithm for recovering empty nodes and their antecedents. In Proceedings of the 40th Meeting of the ACL, pages 136-143, Philadelphia, PA.
15. Marius Pasca and Sanda Harabagiu. 2001. High performance question/answering. In Proceedings of the ACL SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 366-374, New Orleans LA.
16. Mark Steedman. 1996. Surface Structure and Interpretation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Mark Steedman. 2000. The Syntactic Process. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.