Fully parsing the Penn Treebank

HLT-NAACL 2006 - Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 184-191

  Gabbard, Ryan ^a   Marcus, Mitchell ^a   Kulick, Seth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

DATA FRAGMENTATION; FUNCTION TAGS; LINES OF CODE; MODERN MACHINES; RICH FEATURES; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE; SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS; SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 34748899548     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220835.1220859     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, and Robert MacIntyre. 1995. Bracketing guidelines for Treebank II style Penn Treebank project. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Daniel M. Bikel. 2004. On the Parameter Space of Lexicalized Statistical Parsing Models. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Pennsylvania.
3. E. Black, S. Abney, D. Flickinger, C. Gdaniec, R. Grishman, P. Harrison, D. Hindle, R. Ingria, F. Jelinek, J. Klavans, M. Liberman, M. Marcus, S. Roukos, B. Santorini, and T. Strzalkowski. 1991. A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars. In Proceedings of the Fourth DARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, pages 306-311, CA.
4. Don Blaheta and Eugene Charniak. 2000. Assigning function tags to parsed text. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 234-240, Seattle.
5. Don Blaheta. 2003. Function Tagging. Ph.D. thesis, Brown University.
6. Richard Campbell. 2004. Using linguistic principles to recover empty categories. In Proceedings of ACL.
7. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalized models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid.
9. Michael Collins. 2003. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 29:589-637. (Pubitemid 39056498)
10. Peter Dienes and Amit Dubey. 2003a. Antecedent recovery: Experiments with a trace tagger. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
11. Peter Dienes and Amit Dubey. 2003b. Deep processing by combining shallow methods. In Proceedings of ACL.
12. James Henderson. 2003. Inducing history representations for broad coverage statistical parsing. In Proceedings of NLT-NAACL 2003, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Valentin Jijkoun and Maarten de Rijke. 2004. Enriching the output of a parser using memory-based learning. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain.
14. Mark Johnson. 2002. A simple pattern-matching algorithm for recovering empty nodes and their antecedents. In Proceedings of the 40st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA.
15. Roger Levy and Christopher Manning. 2004. Deep dependencies from context-free statistical parsers: correcting the surface dependency approximation. In Proceedings of the ACL.
16. Andrew Kachites McCallum. 2002. Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
17. Gabriele Musillo and Paolo Merlo. 2005. Lexical and structural biases for function parsing. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Parsing Technology, pages 83-92, Vancouver, British Columbia, October. Association for Computational Linguistics.