|
Volumn 87, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 1352-1355
|
Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ANORECTAL PRESSURE;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST;
DIATHERMY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEMORRHOID;
HEMORRHOIDECTOMY;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MALE;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RECTOSCOPY;
SIGMOIDOSCOPY;
SURGICAL STAPLING;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
SUTURING METHOD;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
ADULT;
AGED;
FEMALE;
HEMORRHOIDS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PRESSURE;
SURGICAL STAPLING;
SUTURE TECHNIQUES;
|
EID: 0033780214
PISSN: 00071323
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01624.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (120)
|
References (10)
|