The hidden curriculum: Medical students' changing opinions toward the pharmaceutical industry

Academic Medicine

Volumn 82, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Fitz, Matthew M ^a   Homan, David ^b   Reddy, Shalini ^b   Griffith III, Charles H ^b   Baker, Elizabeth ^b   Simpson, Kevin P ^b  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY; CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT; DRUG INDUSTRY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; FISHER EXACT TEST; GENERAL PATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STAFF; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME OF EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 34748876597     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31813e7f02     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bellin M, McCarthy S, Drevlow L, Pierach C. Medical students' exposure to pharmaceutical industry marketing: a survey at one US medical school. Acad Med. 2004;79:1041-1045.
2. Sierles FS, Brodkey AC, Cleary LM, McCurdy FA, Mintz M. Medical students' exposure to and attitudes about drug company interaction: a national survey. JAMA. 2005;294:1034-1042.
3. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA. 2000;283:373-380.
4. Hyman PL, Hochman ME, Shaw JG, Steinman MA. Attitudes of preclinical and clinical medical students toward interactions with the pharmaceutical industry. Acad Med. 2007;82:94-99.
5. Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas SC, Cohen JJ. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest: a policy proposal for academic medical centers. JAMA. 2006;295:429-433.
6. Blumenthal D. Doctors and drug companies. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1885-1890.
7. Katz D, Caplan AL, Merz JF. All gifts large and small: toward an understanding of the ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3:39-46.
8. Barfett J, Lanting B, Lee J, Lee M, Ng V, Simkhovitch P. Pharmaceutical marketing to medical students: the student perspective. Mcgill Med J. 2004;8:21-27.
9. Fischer C, Shashaty E, Watkins D, Lurie P, Wolfe S. A survey of medical students' attitudes and practices regarding gifts from pharmaceutical companies [abstract]. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;189(supp l):247.
10. ACCME Annual Report Data 2003. Chicago, Ill: Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education; 2003.
11. Steinmen MA, Shlipak MG, McPhee SJ. Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions. Am J Med. 2001;110:551-557.
12. Wofford JL, Ohl CA. Teaching appropriate interactions with pharmaceutical company representatives: the impact of an innovative workshop on student attitudes. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:5.
13. Rogers WA, Mansfield PR, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Jureidini JN. The ethics of pharmaceutical industry relationships with medical students. Med J Aust. 2004;180:411-414.
14. Faunce TA, Gatenby P. Flexner's ethical oversight reprised? Contemporary medical education and the health impacts of corporate globalization. Med Educ. 2005;39:1066-1074.
15. Zipkin DA, Steinman MA. Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:777-786.