Software engineering team diversity and performance

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 204, Issue , 2006, Pages 180-186

  Pieterse, Vreda ^a   Kourie, Derrick G ^a   Sonnekus, Inge P ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Personality; Teaching teamwork; Team ability; Team diversity; Team performance

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DATA ACQUISITION; EXPERT SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STUDENTS;

TEACHING TEAMWORK; TEAM ABILITY; TEAM DIVERSITY; TEAM PERFORMANCE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 34748865925     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1216262.1216282     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. BARON, J. AND NORMAN, M. F. 1992. SATs, achievement tests, and high school class rank as predictors of college performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52 (2), 1047-1055
2. BELBIN, R.M. 1981. Management Teams. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
3. BIFFL, S. AND HALLING, M. 2003. Investigating the Defect Detection Effectiveness and Cost Benefit of Nominal Inspection. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29 (5), 385-397
4. BOEREE, C.G., 2003, Jungian. Types Test. URL: http://www.ship.edu/ ~cgboeree/jungiantypestest.html.
5. BOEHM, B., EGYED, A. KWAN, J. PORT, D. SHAH, A. AND MADACHY, R. 1998, Using the WinWin Spiral Model: A Case Study. Computer 31(7), 33-44.
6. BRADLEY, J.H. AND HEBERT, F.J. 1997. The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development 16 (5), 337-353
7. DENNING, P.J. 1992. Educating the New Engineer, Communications of the ACM, 35 (12), 83-97.
8. EDGE, O.P. AND ERIEDBERG S.H. 1984. Factors Affecting Achievement in. the First Course of Calculus, Journal of Experimental. Education, 52(3), 136-140
9. GORLA N. AND LAM Y. W. 2004. Who should work with whom? Communications of the ACM., 46 (6), 79-82
10. GUINAN, P.J, COOPRIDER, J.G. AND FARAJ, S. 1998. Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A. Behavioral Versus Technical Approach. Information Systems Research 9(2), 101-125
11. HAZZAN, O. AND TOMAYKO, J.E. 2004. Reflection Processes in the Teaching and Learning of Human Aspects of Software Engineering. Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET04)
12. HOUSE, J.D. 2000. Academic Background and Self-Beliefs as Predictors of Student Grade Performance in Science, Engineering and Mathematics. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27 (2) 207-213
13. KEIRSEY, D. AND BATES, M. 1984. Please Understand Me, Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, Del Mar, California.
14. KOCH, P-P. 2003. The Ideal Web Team. (part. 1). Digital Web Magazine, http://www.digital-web.com/articles/the_ideal_web_team_part1/
15. LINGARD, R. AND BERRY, E. 2002. Teaching Teamwork, in Software Engineering based on an understanding of factors affecting group performance. Proceedings of the 32th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov 6-9, Boston, MA.
16. MYERS, I. B. AND BRIGGS, K .1975. The Myers-Briggs type indicator (Form G). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. PAULK, M.C. 2002. Agile Methodologies and Process Discipline, CrossTalk, Oct 2002, 15-18.
18. RUTHERFOORD, R.H. 200.1. Using Personality Inventories to Help Form Teams for Software Engineering Class Projects. ITiCSE 2001 6/01 Canterbury, UK., 73-76
19. SMITH D.C., BECKER M., BURNS-HOWELL J. AND KYRIAKIDES, J. 2001. Creating High performance IS Teams, SAICSIT, Pretoria 25-28 September 2001, 172-181