Variation in the use of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis of breast abnormalities in Ontario

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2932-2939

  Holloway, Claire M B ^a   Saskin, Refik ^b   Brackstone, Muriel ^c   Paszat, Lawrence ^b,d  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast; Diagnosis; Needle biopsy; Percutaneous biopsy; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANADA; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; URBAN POPULATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 34648832095     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9362-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Rubin E, Mennemeyer ST, Desmond RA, et al. Reducing the cost of diagnosis of breast carcinoma: impact of ultrasound and imaging-guided biopsies on a clinical breast practice. Cancer 2001;91:324-32
2. Nuffield Institute for Health, ed. The Management of Primary Breast Cancer. University of Leeds and NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination No. 2. University of York Effective Health Care, 1996
3. Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:344-8
4. Masood S. Occult breast lesions and aspiration biopsy: a new challenge. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:613-4
5. Wilkinson EJ, Masood S. Stereotactic imaging and breast biopsy. In: Bland KI, Copeland EM, eds. The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases. Vol 36, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998:698-735
6. White RR, Halperin TJ, Olson JA Jr, Soo MS, Bentley RC, Seigler HF. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 2001;233:769-77
7. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-64
8. Kaye MD, Vicinanza-Adami CA, Sullivan ML. Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. Radiology 1994;192:149-51
9. Fuhrman GM, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. Ann Surg 1998;227:932-9
10. Verkooijen, Helena M, and the Core Biopsy After Radiological Localisation (COBRA) Study Group. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002;99:853-9
11. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:941-8
12. Whitten TM, Wallace TW, Bird RE, Turk PS. Image-guided core biopsy has advantages over needle localization biopsy for the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Am Surg 1997;63:1072-7
13. Yim JH, Barton P, Weber B, et al. Mammographically detected breast cancer: benefits of stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg 1996;223:688-700
14. Smith DN, Christian R, Meyer JE. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast cancers: the impact on subsequent surgical excisions. Arch Surg 1997;132:256-9
15. Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E, et al. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2006;4:480-508
16. McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg 2005;48:185-94
17. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677-84
18. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-64
19. Al-Sobhi SS, Helvie MA, Pass HA, Chang AE. Extent of lumpectomy for breast cancer after diagnosis by stereotactic core versus wire localization biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 1999;6:330-5
20. Butler WM, Cunningham JE, Bull D, et al. Breast cancer care: changing community standards. J Healthcare Qual 2004;26:22-8
21. Morrow M, Venta L, Stinson T, Bennett C. Prospective comparison of stereotactic core biopsy and surgical excision as diagnostic procedures for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 2001;233:537-41
22. Lind DS, Minter R, Steinbach B, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer. J Surg Res 1998;78:23-6
23. Olivotto IA, Kan L, King S. Waiting for a diagnosis after an abnormal screeening mammogram. Can J Public Health 2000;91:113-7
24. Beaulieu J, Galland J, Fleming S, Chen K, Peng X. Geographic variation in breast-conserving surgery in Kentucky's Medicare population. J Ky Med Assoc 2002;100:99-103
25. Craft PS, Primrose JG, Lindner JA, McManus PR. Surgical management of breast cancer in Australian women in 1993: analysis of Medicare statistics. Med J Aust 1997;166:626-9
26. Laliberte L, Fennell ML, Papandonatos G. The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer. Med Care 2005;43:471-9