MR Imaging of the Pancreas: 1.5T versus 3T

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 349-353

  Edelman, Robert R ^a,b  

^a EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CANCER; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34548853114     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2007.06.005     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Available at: www.pancreatica.org. Accessed June 15, 2007.
2. Jemal A., Murray T., Samuels A., et al. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53 (2003) 5-26
3. Poston G.J., and Williamson R.C. Causes, diagnosis, and management of exocrine pancreatic cancer. Compr Ther 16 (1990) 36-42
4. Tsuchiya R., Noda T., Harada N., et al. Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg 203 (1986) 77-81
5. Ariyama J., Suyama M., Satoh K., et al. Imaging of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 16 (1998) 396-401
6. Santo E. Pancreatic cancer imaging: which method?. JOP 5 4 (2004) 253-257
7. Bronstein Y.L., Evelyne M., Loyer E.M., et al. Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 619-623
8. Gangi S., Fletcher J.G., Nathan M.A., et al. Time interval between abnormalities seen on CT and the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: retrospective review of CT scans obtained before diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 897-903
9. Ishikawa O., Ohigashi H., Imaoka S., et al. Minute carcinoma of the pancreas measuring 1 cm or less in diameter: collective review of Japanese case reports. Hepatogastroenterology 46 (1999) 8-15
10. Hunt G.C., and Faigel D.O. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002) 232-237
11. Canto M., Wroblewski L., Goggins M., et al. Screening for pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: the Johns Hopkins experience. [abstract]. Gastroenterology 122 Suppl 1 (2002) A17
12. Goggins M., Canto M., and Hruban R. Can we screen high-risk individuals to detect early pancreatic carcinoma?. J Surg Oncol 74 (2000) 243-248
13. Keogan M., and Edelman R. Technologic advances in abdominal MR imaging. Radiology 220 (2001) 310-320
14. Sheridan M.B., Ward J., Guthrie J.A., et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 (1999) 583-590
15. Schima W., Fugger R., Schober E., et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast enhanced helical hydro-CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179 (2002) 717-724
16. Merkle E.M., and Dale B.M. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1524-1532
17. de Bazelaire C.M.J., Duhamel G.D., Rofsky N.M., et al. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 230 (2004) 652-659
18. Edelman R.R., Salanitri G., Brand R., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla qualitative and quantitative comparison with 1.5 tesla. Invest Radiol 41 (2006) 175-180
19. Rohrer M., Bauer H., Mintorovitch J., et al. Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Invest Radiol 40 11 (2005) 715-724
20. Ichikawa1 T., Erturk S.M., Motosugi U., et al. High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 (2007) 409-414
21. Merkle E.M., Haugan P.A., Thomas J., et al. 3.0- versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography, 2006 cholangiography: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 516-521