Glass walls in state bureaucracies: Examining the difference departmental function can Make

Public Administration Review

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 880-891

  Sneed, Bethany G ^a  

^a EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548837475     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00775.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anker, Richard. 1998. Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World. Geneva : International Labour Office.
2. Ballard, T. N. 2001. Room at the top. Government Executive 33 (7 16.
3. Berheide, Catherine White, and J. Saidel. 2000. The Changing Government Workforce in States and Localities, 1900-1997. Albany : Center for Women in Government, University at Albany. http://nysl.nysed.gov/archimages/77718.pdf accessed July 24, 2007.
4. Bullard, Angela M., and Deil S. Wright. 1993. Circumventing the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives in America. Public Administration Review 53 (3 189 203.
5. Cayer, N. Joseph, and Lee Sigelman. 1980. Minorities and Women in State and Local Government: 1973-1975. Public Administration Review 40 (5 443 50.
6. Cornwell, Christopher, and J.Edward Kellough. 1994. Women and Minorities in Federal Government Agencies: Examining New Evidence from Panel Data. Public Administration Review 54 (3 265 70.
7. Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC). 2004. Employment Trends in State Government, FY1966-FY2003. http://www.crcmich.org/publicat/2000s/2004/ rpt336.pdf accessed July 19, 2007 10 (3 513 29.
8. Dolan, Julie, and David H. Rosenbloom, eds. 2003. Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies. Armonk, NY : M.E. Sharpe.
9. Frederickson, H. George. 1990. Public Administration and Social Equity. Public Administration Review 50 (2 228 37.
10. Guy, Mary Ellen, and Meredith A. Newman. 2004. Women's Jobs, Men's Jobs: Sex Segregation and Emotional Labor. Public Administration Review 64 (3 289 98.
11. Hale, Mary M., and Rita Mae Kelly, eds. 1989. Gender, Bureaucracy, and Democracy: Careers and Equal Opportunity in the Public Sector. Westport, CT : Greenwood Press.
12. Kelly, Rita Mae. 1991. The Gendered Economy: Work, Careers, and Success. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.
13. Kelly, Rita Mae, and Meredith A. Newman. 2001. The Gendered Bureaucracy: Agency Mission, Equality of Opportunity, and Representative Bureaucracies. Women & Politics 22 (3 1 33.
14. Kerr, Brinck, Will Miller, and Margaret Reid. 2002. Sex-Based Occupational Segregation in U.S. State Bureaucracies, 1987-97. Public Administration Review 62 (4 412 23.
15. Krislov, Samuel. 1974. Representative Bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
16. Lewis, Gregory B. 1994. Women, Occupations, and Federal Agencies: Occupational Mix and Interagency Differences in Sexual Inequality in Federal White-Collar Employment. Public Administration Review 54 (3 271 76.
17. Lewis, Gregory B. 1996. Gender Integration of Occupations in the Federal Civil Service: Extent and Effects on Male-Female Earnings. Industrial Relations Review 49 (3 472 90.
18. Lewis, Gregory B., and David Nice. 1994. Race, Sex, and Occupational Segregation in State and Local Governments. American Review of Public Administration 24 (4 393 410.
19. Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16 (4 677 715.
20. Lowi, Theodore J. 1985. The State in Politics: The Relation between Policy and Administration. In Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, edited by Roger G. Noll, 67 104. Los Angeles : University of California Press.
21. Massey, Douglas S., and Nancy A. Denton. 1988. The Dimensions of Residential Segregation. Social Forces 67 (2 281 315.
22. McGlen, Nancy E., Karen O'Connor, Laura van Assendelft, and Wendy Gunther-Canada. 2002. Women, Politics, and American Society. 3rd ed. New York : Longman.
23. Meier, Kenneth J. 1975. Representative Bureaucracy: An Empirical Analysis. American Political Science Review 69 (2 526 42.
24. Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition. In Research in Public Administration, ed. James L. Perry, 1 36. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
25. Meier, Kenneth J., and John Bohte. 2001. Structure and Discretion: Missing Links in Representative Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (4 455 70.
26. Miller, Will, Brinck Kerr, and Margaret Reid. 1999. A National Study of Gender-Based Occupational Segregation in Municipal Bureaucracies: Persistence of Glass Walls? Public Administration Review 59 (3 218 30.
27. Mosher, Frederick C. 1982. Democracy and the Public Service. 2nd ed. New York : Oxford University Press.
28. Naff, Katherine C. 2001. To Look Like America: Dismantling Barriers for Women and Minorities in Government. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
29. Newman, Meredith A. 1994. Gender and Lowi's Thesis: Implications for Career Advancement. Public Administration Review 54 (3 277 84.
30. Newman, Meredith A. 1996. Equal Employment Opportunity and the Glass Ceiling: A Contradiction in Terms? Public Administration Quarterly 19 (4 420 34.
31. Reskin, Barbara R., and Heidi I. Hartmann, eds. 1986. Women's Work, Men's Work: Sex Segregation on the Job. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
32. Reskin, Barbara F., and Patricia A. Roos. 1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia : Temple University Press.
33. Riccucci, Norma M., and Judith R. Saidel. 1997. The Representativeness of State-Level Bureaucratic Leaders: A Missing Piece of the Representative Bureaucracy Puzzle. Public Administration Review 57 (5 423 30.
34. Sowa, Jessica E., and Sally Coleman Selden. 2003. Administrative Discretion and Active Representation: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 63 (6 700 710.
35. Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York : Oxford University Press.
36. Thompson, Frank J. 1976. Minority Groups in Public Bureaucracies: Are Passive and Active Representation Linked? Administration & Society 8 (2 201 26.